More stories

  • in

    Netflix Users Rejoice: Goodbye, Autoplay

    Twitter spoke, and Netflix listened.On Thursday, the streaming behemoth announced that it would give viewers a choice: autoplay or no autoplay. Viewers can now not only skip automatic previews, but also prevent the next episode in a series from playing immediately after the previous one. It’s a seemingly minor change, but some subscribers celebrated the announcement as if it was a great populist victory.It’s a common annoyance for some Netflix users. While you’re scrolling through the vast library of movies and television shows, if the cursor hovers for a nanosecond too long, the beast that is Netflix autoplay is unleashed.“Morning, bakers! Welcome to your very first day in the tent,” says a lively British voice coaxing you to click on “The Great British Baking Show.”“What I love about Charlie…,” Scarlett Johansson begins, luring you to spend an evening with “Marriage Story.”“When I started Goop in 2008 …,” Gwyneth Paltrow starts her story, hoping that this preview will convince you that “The Goop Lab” is for you.Netflix bypassed a news release or a statement this time and tweeted the announcement in response to a Netflix subscriber who had shared a personal gripe about autoplay on Twitter. (She said she had resorted to simply muting the television while she searched for something to watch.)Autoplay, which has existed as a built-in feature since 2016, seemed designed to keep subscribers’ eyes on Netflix and off their streaming competitors (and real life, for that matter). When one episode of “Arrested Development” ended, another would begin in seconds — no need to wear yourself out by clicking a button. And if no title was revealing itself as the pick of the night, an automatic preview might whet your binge-watching appetite.A spokeswoman for Netflix said that autoplay was intended to help make it “faster and easier for our members to find titles tailored to their tastes.” Some viewers clearly didn’t feel helped.Netflix’s announcement was met with triumph by many subscribers, but for others, the mission wasn’t complete. They simply took to Twitter to asked for more changes to their streaming pet peeves. More

  • in

    Jameela Jamil Accused of Lying About Her Role in New Vogueing Show 'Legendary'

    Instagram

    The ‘Good Place’ actress says she’s just one of the judges on the show, but LGBTQ+ stars claim she’s also one of the executive producers along with two non-queer white guys.
    Feb 7, 2020
    AceShowbiz – Stars from LGBTQ+ TV shows “Pose” and “Transparent” have claimed Jameela Jamil is more heavily involved in HBO Max’s upcoming vogueing competition show than she is letting on.
    “Legendary” is inspired by the underground LGBTQ+ club scene which gained momentum between the 1960s and 1980s, and will feature divas battling on teams called ‘Houses’ in challenges involving fashion, dance, and voguing, for a trophy and cash prize.
    While “The Good Place” star Jameela has insisted she’s “just one of the judges” on the show, actress Trace Lysette, who stars in comedy series “Transparent”, called her out on social media, alleging she is also “the Executive Producer along with two cis (non-queer) white guys who produced (Netflix series) queer eye.”
    “I interviewed for this gig. As the mother of a house for nearly a decade it’s kind of mind blowing when ppl with no connection to our culture gets the gig,” the transgender star, who is the founding mother of the house of Gorgeous Gucci, wrote.
    While Jameela insisted the pair “weren’t up for the same thing,” Trace hit back, “I don’t have (to) audition to be a house mother… I am one… I never heard back.”
    And after Jameela came out as queer on social media, and simultaneously slammed the site as being “brutal,” Trace added, “Being queer does not make you ballroom… The only thing that makes you ballroom is if you are actually from it.”
    Meanwhile, “Pose” actor Johnny Sibilly also spoke out, as he retweeted a thread from writer and podcast host Ira Madison III, noting, “Jameela once said she turned down a role as a deaf character because she is not deaf. Announced this publicly to let us know she would never take up space. It is not illogical that many queer people of color yesterday then wanted to know why she, who had not come out as queer would allow herself to be a judge on a ballroom show, a culture she is not familiar with.”
    Johnny added, “Miss thing basically said ‘I can help it that I’m popular’ & I’m helping amplify something that otherwise wouldn’t be able to exist. BULLS**T!”
    “Pose” star and transgender rights advocate Angelica Ross also spoke out about Jameela’s casting, while “RuPaul’s Drag Race” judge Michelle Visage, who was prominent on the New York ballroom scene, also chimed in, insisting, “And I wasn’t even contacted. You know the T.”

    You can share this post!

    Next article
    Actor Brian Cox Wants British Monarchy Abolished Following Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s Exit

    Related Posts More

  • in

    ‘Homeland’ Gives the Long War a Long Goodbye

    In the eighth and final season of “Homeland,” the C.I.A. officer Carrie Mathison (Claire Danes) returns to Afghanistan and comes across the child of a contact she dealt with years ago. He’s growing tall now. When she last saw him, he barely came up to her knee.“Homeland,” which returns Sunday night on Showtime, is about a lot of things, personal and geopolitical. But at its most powerful, the new season conjures that simple, sad feeling: My God, it’s been so long. All of this — the war, the fear, the vengeance — has been with us for so many years, it’s hard to remember a time without it.That feeling was built into “Homeland.” It began, in 2011, a full decade since the Sept. 11 attacks. “24” — the show’s precursor, with which “Homeland” shares creative talent — had by then aired eight seasons.Where “24” flourished in the fight-or-flight rush of 9/11’s aftermath, spinning out cathartic fantasies of ever-bigger terrorist attacks on the United States, “Homeland” looked at the psychic cost of all those years of fighting and catastrophizing.Jack Bauer, the tortured torturer of “24,” took on the physical burden of the war on terror. He was a hard-boiled St. Sebastian, pin-cushioned with all the arrows he took for us over the years. “Homeland,” created by Howard Gordon and Alex Gansa of “24” and based on an Israeli series, focused on the war’s internal wounds through Carrie, an officer living with bipolar disorder as well as lingering horror at the intelligence failures before 9/11.As dicey as it can be to use actual mental illness as a symbol for national trauma, Carrie was a kind of synecdoche for a rattled America. She both fought the shadow war for us and felt it — more intensely so when she took the case of Nicholas Brody (Damian Lewis), an American prisoner of war turned by his captors into a sleeper agent, who became her target and her lover.There could have been a version of “Homeland” that ran as a single, devastating limited series and went out a legend. This version did not. As it spun Brody’s story into a second season, then killed him off in a third, it began to suffer from implausibility and plot one-upmanship.And though it had a greater political sophistication than “24” and its like, “Homeland” still tended to see its non-American characters more as objects than subjects. This blind spot was manifest in Season 5 when artists hired to tag a refugee-camp set with Arabic graffiti painted “‘Homeland’ is racist” into their work without anyone on the production noticing.But even in its weaker seasons, “Homeland” was bolstered by a commitment to nuance, in its politics and its characters. Danes’s raw-nerve performance has been stunning throughout. And Carrie’s partnership with Saul Berenson (Mandy Patinkin) has been one of TV’s most complicated pairings: They’ve been mentor and pupil, peers, surrogate family, adversaries and uneasy allies, their interactions charged simultaneously with warmth and with a necessary professional chill.Over the years, the thriller evolved to focus not just on America and the Islamic world but on crises within the West as well. In the most recent season, in 2018, Russian operatives launched a disinformation campaign that precipitated a constitutional crisis in the United States and ultimately led to the resignation of the president — as well as Carrie’s capture by the Russians, who withheld the medication that had kept her stable.It was a powerful treatment of a current-day America where the horror had moved from sleeper cells to troll farms, where enemies attacked us not with our own aircraft but with our own animus. All these years, anxious and angry, we had been whetting sharper and sharper blades, the better to cut ourselves with.In the new season, Saul, now the national security adviser to the new president, Ralph Warner (Beau Bridges), is conducting negotiations to end the war in Afghanistan at last. When the peace process is undermined, he recruits Carrie, still recovering from spending months in a psychotic state as a captive — though the C.I.A. is concerned that she revealed information during the long stretch of her imprisonment that she can’t recall.This setup brings “Homeland” full circle. Carrie, having sacrificed her sanity and even custody of her daughter by Brody in the service of her mission, has to readjust to fieldwork while wondering, herself, what she might have said while the Russians had broken her. She may, in a way, be Brody now, and one of her own adversaries is herself — at least, the mysterious, unmedicated version of herself lost to her own memory.The first four episodes of the season have their wild plot lurches but also the gimlet eye for human nature of “Homeland” at its best. Danes gives us a Carrie who’s older and wiser (“I’m not as fun as I used to be,” she deadpans, ordering a nonalcoholic drink) but also wrenchingly aware of her own precariousness. And the show is conscious of the collateral damage of the great game, as with the story of Samira Noori (Sitara Attaie), an Afghan woman whose husband was killed by a car bomb after she spoke out against government corruption.There’s an elegiac feeling to “Homeland” returning to the site of a war a generation old. The season returns a number of characters from past seasons, but the long war, in a way, is the ultimate enemy — formless, multiheaded and endlessly able to reconstitute itself and survive.There are glimmers of hope that this time might finally be different. But the show’s realpolitik worldview suggests that you not bet on it, as it demonstrates in a scene that captures the mind-set of endless war in miniature. Bunny Latif (Art Malik), a retired Pakistani general who figured into Season 4, is sitting with a revolver in his garden, where to the consternation of his neighbors he’s been shooting the squirrels who steal from his bird feeders.Asked why he doesn’t simply stop filling the feeders rather than spend his free hours turning his backyard into a war zone, he answers as if the question were insane: “That wouldn’t be fair on the birds, would it?” In big wars and small ones, “Homeland” tells us, people can always find reasons to stick to their guns. More

  • in

    Gayle King 'Embarrassed' Amid Backlash Over Question About Kobe Bryant's Alleged Rape

    WENN/Avalon

    The CBS anchor breaks her silence following the outrage over question about Kobe Bryant’s sexual assault case, ‘if I had only seen the clip that you saw, I’d be extremely angry with me too.’
    Feb 7, 2020
    AceShowbiz – Gayle King has hit out at executives at CBS over a promo clip of an interview with the late Kobe Bryant’s friend, former WNBA (Women’s National Basketball Association) star Lisa Leslie, about his rape trial.
    The NBA legend was killed in a helicopter crash at the age of 41 last month, along with his 13-year-old daughter Gianna and seven others.
    He had previously been embroiled in a sexual assault case, which was dismissed as a criminal complaint but settled as a civil case in 2005, an episode which came up in the chat.
    “It’s been said that his legacy is complicated, because of a sexual assault charge that was dismissed in 2003, 2004. Is it complicated for you, as a woman, as a WNBA player?” King asked.
    Leslie then replied, “It’s not complicated for me at all… I just never see – have ever seen him being the kind of person that would be – do something to violate a woman or be aggressive in that way. That’s just not the person that I know.”
    “But Lisa, you wouldn’t see it though. As his friend, you wouldn’t see it,” King responded.
    The snippet was part of a wider interview, but was the only part released online, with fans attacking King over the apparent ill-timed question.
    Taking to Instagram, she responded, “I’ve been up reading the comments about the interview I did with Lisa Leslie about Kobe Bryant, and I know that if I had only seen the clip that you saw, I’d be extremely angry with me too.”
    “I am mortified. I am embarrassed and I am very angry. Unbeknownst to me, my network put up a clip from a very wide-ranging interview – totally taken out of context – and when you see it that way, it’s very jarring. It’s jarring to me. I didn’t even know anything about it.”
    Honouring Bryant as “warm and friendly,” the broadcaster insisted there will be “a very intense discussion” between her and the network.
    However, she also said she pushed the network to keep the segment in the interview, “because I thought it put a nice button on that part of the conversation.”

    She concluded, “I wanted you to hear exactly where I’m coming from and how I’m feeling, and to let everybody know that no disrespect intended … I thank you for listening.”

    You can share this post!

    Next article
    Jameela Jamil Accused of Lying About Her Role in New Vogueing Show ‘Legendary’

    Related Posts More

  • in

    Director Stephen Poliakoff Denies Pressuring His 'Close to the Enemy' Actress to Do Nude Scene

    Facebook

    The ‘Close to the Enemy’ director is accused of throwing tantrums when the BBC drama actress Emily Berrington asked for the details of a potential nude scene.
    Feb 6, 2020
    AceShowbiz – British director Stephen Poliakoff has denied actress Emily Berrington’s claims that he tried to pressure her into doing nude scenes for BBC drama “Close to the Enemy”.
    The 34-year-old screen star, who has also appeared in shows such as “Humans”, “Outnumbered”, and “Sons of Liberty”, told Britain’s The Guardian newspaper that Poliakoff became enraged when she asked for details of a potential nude scene – such as how long she’d have to be naked for and whether she would have a say in which parts of her body were exposed.
    Upon asking Poliakoff, Berrington told The Guardian that he “started shouting really aggressively and saying I was being precious, and it was too difficult to work with actresses like me.”
    The BAFTA and Emmy award-winning director and scriptwriter is also said to have told Berrington that he “shoots what he wants” and “shows what he wants.”
    However, in response to Berrington’s claims, Poliakoff told The Guardian in a statement, “I am sorry to hear Emily is upset. This is not my recollection of the conversation and, as I recall, my main purpose of the discussion – which took place a couple of months before the actual shoot – was to reassure her in a supportive way about the role.”
    “I have always been very conscious that nude scenes are extremely stressful for actors, male or female, and never want them to feel uncomfortable in any way.”
    A spokesperson for the BBC added of the allegations, “We take the greatest care when including intimate scenes in any drama, and we expect all our productions to work to the highest standard of integrity in this regard.”

    You can share this post!

    Next article
    Jay-Z Recalls Last Conversation With Kobe Bryant on New Year

    Related Posts More

  • in

    Billy Porter Reacts to Accusations He'll 'Sexualize Children' With 'Sesame Street' Appearance

    Instagram

    The ‘Pose’ star is facing criticisms after he’s announced to make an appearance on the popular children’s show wearing his dress from the 2019 Academy Awards.
    Feb 6, 2020
    AceShowbiz – Billy Porter has slammed critics of his appearance on “Sesame Street”, after he announced he’ll be appearing on the show in the dress he wore to last year’s Oscars.
    The “Pose” actor, who is a vocal member of the LGBTQ+ community and renowned for his flamboyant style and red carpet attire, will wear the black Christian Siriano tuxedo gown on an instalment of the popular children’s show later this year, prompting critics to slam the star.
    Trolls, including the state senator of Arkansas, Jason Rapert, tore into Porter, asking on Facebook, “Do you approve of your taxpayer dollars being used to promote the radical LGBTQ agenda?”
    A petition circulated to have the episode pulled and even accused the program of trying to “sexualise children using drag queens.”
    However, the Broadway star clapped back in a chat with the New York Post’s gossip column Page Six, insisting, “If you don’t like it, don’t watch it.”
    Adding that it’s unusual to make the mental leap from his dress to “perverted demon sex,” he continued, “Like, what about me singing with a penguin (puppet, on the show) has anything to do with what I’m doing in my bedroom?”
    “The really interesting thing for me is that that’s what it’s all about when it comes to LGBTQ people – the first thing everyone wants to talk about is how we having sex.”
    He concluded, “Stay out of my bedroom and you will be fine – that is none of your business.”
    “Sesame Street” has always been at the forefront of promoting key cultural issues on the educational series, and notably featured one of the first televised scenes of breastfeeding, when presenter, singer Buffy Sainte-Marie, demonstrated the act onscreen back in 1977.

    You can share this post!

    Next article
    Director Stephen Poliakoff Denies Pressuring His ‘Close to the Enemy’ Actress to Do Nude Scene

    Related Posts More