Movies

Subterms

    Latest story

    125 Shares14 Views

    Celebrities Support Plan to Reopen Upper West Side Movie Theater

    by

    Martin Scorsese, Ethan Hawke and John Turturro are all listed as advisers to a new proposal to buy the former Metro Theater, which closed in 2005.After almost two decades of failed attempts to reopen, a landmark Upper West Side movie theater may be resurrected with a plan from a potential new buyer and celebrity support.The independent film producer Ira Deutchman is spearheading the project, along with Adeline Monzier, the U.S. representative of the French film promoter Unifrance and a programmer at the Metrograph, a Lower East Side theater. They have formed the Upper West Side Cinema Center, a nonprofit corporation, whose website lists Martin Scorsese, Ethan Hawke and John Turturro as advisers, along with Bob Balaban, Griffin Dunne and the “American Psycho” director Mary Harron. (They would call it the Metro Cinema Center.)Representatives for Scorsese and Dunne confirmed their involvement.The plan was reported earlier by IndieWire.The proposal includes a five-screen theater dedicated to art house releases, classic film and special events; it would also have an education center and a cafe.Mark Levine, the Manhattan borough president, said he has spoken with two other parties that are talking with the owners about a potential sale, but Deutchman’s proposal is the most fully developed. The estate of the former owner also has yet to engage a broker for the sale, Levine said.The Upper West Side, once a hot spot for art house theaters, is now served by selections at Film at Lincoln Center and large multiplexes. “This is a really underserved audience that is in a community that clearly has an interest in the kinds of movies we’re talking about,” Deutchman said in an interview.We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More

    More stories

    • 125 Shares27 Views

      in Movies

      ‘Deadpool’ Refresher: What to Know Before Seeing ‘Deadpool & Wolverine’

      by

      The new installment draws on decades of Marvel and X-Men history. It helps to know the back stories ahead of time.In the new “Deadpool & Wolverine,” two beloved superhero franchises will finally come together in a frenzy of irreverent jokes, gory action and Easter eggs. Drawing on decades of movie history and featuring a dizzying array of characters and references to past plots, it’s the kind of film that rewards longtime fans. For those who haven’t seen the X-Men or Deadpool films in a while, here’s what you need to know before watching.What’s Deadpool’s back story?Before he got his own Deadpool movies, Ryan Reynolds debuted the character in the X-Men franchise, appearing in “X-Men Origins: Wolverine” in 2009. The role didn’t go over well with fans — his mouth was sewn shut in the film — and Reynolds wanted a separate movie to explore the character more fully.Ryan Reynolds as Deadpool.20th Century Fox“Deadpool” (2016), the first of three films in the franchise, introduces Wade Wilson, a foul-mouthed mercenary who falls in love with a woman named Vanessa. After getting a diagnosis of terminal cancer, Wilson volunteers for a shadowy program that promises to heal him. There, he is tortured by the villainous Ajax until his body mutates and receives self-healing powers, similar to those possessed by Wolverine. Aided by an elderly sightless woman, Blind Al, and two other X-Men, Colossus and Negasonic Teenage Warhead, Deadpool eventually hunts down Ajax and reconciles with Vanessa.His relationship with Vanessa is short-lived, however, as “Deadpool 2” (2018) opens with her being killed by one of Wilson’s old mercenary targets. Grieving her loss, he joins the X-Men and works to stop a time-traveling soldier named Cable from killing a young mutant. In that film’s mid-credits scene, Wade uses Cable’s time-traveling device to journey through the past, reversing the death of his friends and the murder of Vanessa.We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More

    • 163 Shares28 Views

      in Movies

      María Félix and Cantinflas Star in Gems From Mexico’s Golden Age of Cinema

      by

      A Lincoln Center retrospective puts the spotlight on midcentury movies aimed at the masses that continue to influence filmmakers.Charitable charlatans, clumsy womanizers, enigmatic dames and even a monster-fighting paladin captured the imagination of Mexico’s audiences during the mid-20th-century golden age of the country’s film industry.An era of prolific production in all genres and of stars with exclusive studio contracts, it rivaled the Hollywood system in the quality and variety of its output. Today, most homegrown Mexican productions struggle to find screens amid the ubiquitous presence of American blockbusters that entice local moviegoers.But from the mid-1930s to the late 1950s, Mexican cinema thrived partly as a consequence of American involvement in World War II. With American resources being allocated to the war effort, Mexican companies saw an opportunity to produce movies for and about their own country that could also travel to other Spanish-speaking territories.Featuring titles largely from this period, the retrospective “Spectacle Every Day: Mexican Popular Cinema” begins Friday at Film at Lincoln Center. Entertainment made for the masses, these movies often set their sights on unlikely heroes and heroines who, despite personality quirks or individual circumstances, exhibited a sturdy moral compass and unshakable pride. They (mostly) do what’s right in the end, even if human weaknesses obstruct their best intentions more than once.For several decades after their original theatrical runs, most of these films endured in the collective Mexican consciousness and continue to influence popular culture through their uninterrupted availability on broadcast TV. As a child in 1990s Mexico City, I caught fragments when visiting my grandmothers for whom the men and women then on the small screen had been larger than life in their youth.In the retrospective, Cantinflas is represented by “The Unknown Policeman” from 1941.Filmoteca UNAMWe are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More

    • 138 Shares18 Views

      in Movies

      Watch a Reynolds and Jackman Diner Chat in ‘Deadpool & Wolverine’

      by

      The director Shawn Levy narrates a scene from the latest sequel in the franchise.In “Anatomy of a Scene,” we ask directors to reveal the secrets that go into making key scenes in their movies. See new episodes in the series on Fridays. You can also watch our collection of more than 150 videos on YouTube and subscribe to our YouTube channel.You probably expect plenty of slicing and dicing in “Deadpool & Wolverine.,” also plenty of irreverence. But what you might not expect is a quiet, softer moment of reflection. This scene, narrated by the film’s director, Shawn Levy, offers exactly that.Featuring Ryan Reynolds and Hugh Jackman, the sequence takes place in the Void, an environmental dumping ground of sorts where the refuse of various timelines is discarded, and where Deadpool and Wolverine find themselves. They come across an empty retro diner and go inside.“It’s a pause along the journey,” Levy said in an extended interview, “and it’s the first meaty and substantial dialogue scene between the two characters, one of whom is famously motor-mouthed, the other of whom is famously laconic and internal.”“This has always been one of Ryan’s and my favorite scenes from the moment we wrote it,” Levy continued, “because it puts two iconic antiheroes in this incredibly generic trope of the Americana road movie. So the mismatch of these visuals, two superheroes sitting in a booth in a ’50s diner while Patsy Cline plays on the jukebox — that was a thrill.”Read the “Deadpool & Wolverine” review.Sign up for the Movies Update newsletter and get a roundup of reviews, news, Critics’ Picks and more. More

    • 125 Shares18 Views

      in Movies

      5 New Movies Our Critics Are Talking About This Week

      by

      Whether you’re a casual moviegoer or an avid buff, our reviewers think these films are worth knowing about.Clever quips meet corporate interests.Ryan Reynolds and Hugh Jackman in “Deadpool & Wolverine.”Jay Maidment/20th Century Studios and Marvel‘Deadpool & Wolverine’Directed by Shawn Levy, this sardonic superhero film follows Deadpool (Ryan Reynolds) and Wolverine (Hugh Jackman) who, thanks to Disney’s acquisition of 20th Century Fox, now both exist in the Marvel Cinematic Universe, as they team up to fight a common enemy.From our review:“Deadpool & Wolverine” is a “Deadpool” movie, which means it’s rude and irreverent, funny and disgusting, weird and a little sweet. Reynolds and Jackman are fun to watch, in part because their onscreen characters contrast so violently with their nice-guy personas offscreen. So much of what the M.C.U. offers feels churned out of the same factory, which makes anything with a distinct personality feel like a relief. But in the end, “Deadpool & Wolverine” is a movie about corporate mergers, about intellectual property, about the ways that the business of Hollywood battles the creative process.In theaters. Read the full review.Critic’s PickSkates right into your heart.From left, Chiron Cilia Denk, Izaac Wang and Montay Boseman in “Didi.”Focus Features/Talking Fish Pictures, LLC.‘Didi’A Taiwanese American, skateboarding-obsessed boy named Chris (Izaac Wang) experiences the trials and triumphs of young adolescence the summer before he enters high school in this semi-autobiographical coming-of-age story from Sean Wang.From our review:Chris is a stand-in for Sean Wang, who built the movie on top of his own memories. So while those recollections are highly specific to the setting and the time period — Chris uses all the AOL Instant Messenger acronyms, chats with the SmarterChild chatbot and checks a friend’s MySpace page to see if he’s still in their Top 8 list — they feel universal, too. When Chris flubs a first kiss, we feel his embarrassment. When he flips out at his mother, and friends look at him askance for his behavior, we feel his confused shame. “Didi” is as much about realizing how others see you as it is about learning to see them for who they really are.In theaters. Read the full review.Bette Midler twerks!From left, Susan Sarandon, Bette Midler, Sheryl Lee Ralph and Megan Mullally in “The Fabulous Four,” directed by Jocelyn Moorhouse.Bleecker Street‘The Fabulous Four’We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More

    • 113 Shares36 Views

      in Movies

      ‘Deadpool & Wolverine’ Reviews Are In: Amusing or Exhausting?

      by

      Few critics could deny that the highly anticipated super spectacle, starring Ryan Reynolds and Hugh Jackman, has its charms — but most left wanting more.After a summer without superheroes, “Deadpool & Wolverine” is slashing its way into theaters.The high-octane collision of the wisecracking antihero Deadpool, played by Ryan Reynolds in two previous films, and the hulking and messianic Wolverine, played by Hugh Jackman (returning to the role for the first time since “Logan” in 2017), marks Marvel Studios’ only release of the calendar year. The movie, directed by Shawn Levy, is projected to have the best ever domestic opening weekend for an R-rated film.Most critics have found something to like in “Deadpool & Wolverine,” which has an 81 percent fresh rating on Rotten Tomatoes. They say it has a superpowered jokes-per-minute ratio and two winning performances from its lead actors. But many reviewers had a mixed-to-negative assessment of the movie overall, calling it difficult to follow, lacking in real tension or stakes and overly reliant on self-referential story lines.Read on for some highlights.Look, I Laughed [Vulture]The movie’s aggressive sense of humor about itself may win you over despite its flaws. “‘Deadpool & Wolverine’ isn’t a particularly good movie — I’m not even sure it is a movie,” Bilge Ebiri wrote. “But it’s so determined to beat you down with its incessant irreverence that you might find yourself submitting to it.”Nothing Ever Ends [The New York Times]The movie’s existence reflects Hollywood’s inability to “let well enough alone,” wrote Alissa Wilkinson, but it’s entertaining nonetheless. “It still features Reynolds making fun of himself; it has some fun set pieces, clever sight gags, amusing surprises, left-field references and adoring pauses to admire Jackman’s biceps and abs.”‘Deadpool & Wolverine’ Makes the M.C.U. the Villain — and Not in a Good Way [Polygon]In a negative review, Joshua Rivera found the film dispiritingly hollow. “‘Deadpool & Wolverine’ has made its hero the worst kind of comic book character: one who doesn’t stand for anything.”Ryan Reynolds and Hugh Jackman’s Sarky Gagathon Mocks the M.C.U. Back to Life [The Guardian]Peter Bradshaw appreciated the movie’s satirical bent while capturing a common complaint about it in a few words. “It’s amusing and exhausting,” he wrote.We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More

    • 113 Shares22 Views

      in Movies

      ‘Only the River Flows’ Review: A Spiraling Murder Investigation

      by

      In this Chinese police procedural, directed by Wei Shujun, solutions are murkier than they first appear.Near the start of “Only the River Flows,” police officers set up an office in a closing movie theater. That backdrop suits this Chinese noir, the third feature from the director Wei Shujun, which, at times, feels like it unfolds in a universe of other films.Tangled, unresolved procedurals like Bong Joon Ho’s “Memories of Murder” and David Fincher’s “Zodiac” loom large. Much of the score, on the other hand, is taken, strangely, from David Cronenberg’s “Crash” — not a murder mystery, but perhaps a clue to the kind of mind-body disconnect and existential stakes that Wei’s film means to ponder.The story, largely set in 1995, follows a police captain named Ma Zhe (Zhu Yilong) as he investigates the killing of a woman called Granny Four. At first, the case seems straightforward: Granny Four had taken in a simpleton who, throughout the movie, is known only as “the madman” (Kang Chunlei) — a natural suspect. But nothing is so clear-cut. Many of this thriller’s pleasures involve watching Ma Zhe chase leads, as he listens to a cassette found at the crime scene to try to locate a woman heard on it or questions a hairdresser (Wang Jianyu) who seems eager to be apprehended.But “Only the River Flows,” based on a work by the author Yu Hua, is not the pure pulp a summary suggests. (An opening quotation from Albert Camus is fair warning.) As Ma Zhe’s personal life and the investigation begin to merge in his mind, Wei’s film increasingly blurs the line between the real and the imagined. The filmmaker has a gift for disorientation — a chilling cut connects a scene of a pregnancy ultrasound to Ma Zhe flipping through slides of murder evidence — that partly compensates for the muddiness of the plot.Only the River FlowsNot rated. In Mandarin, with subtitles. Running time: 1 hour 41 minutes. In theaters. More

    • 88 Shares30 Views

      in Movies

      ‘Rhinegold’ Review: Rapping With a Rap Sheet

      by

      Based on the life of an Iranian German drug dealer and rapper, Fatih Akin’s interminable drama feels uncomfortably partial to its violent subject.Any enjoyment of Fatih Akin’s protracted, genre-hopping “Rhinegold” requires that you give a hoot about its thoroughly unlikable subject, a violent criminal and, later, successful rap artist named Giwar Hajabi. And while Emilio Sakraya deserves respect for tackling the monumentally unsympathetic role of the adult Hajabi, his cocky charisma only underscores the movie’s seeming enchantment with his character’s wrongdoing. As does a fairy-tale ending featuring frolicking, animated mermaids.Inspired by Hajabi’s tumultuous life, “Rhinegold” opens in 2010 with his torture in a Syrian prison for refusing to cough up the bullion from an audacious gold heist. From there, the film flashes back to his inauspicious birth in a rubble-strewn cave as his parents, both Kurdish musicians, flee the Iranian Revolution. By the mid-1990s, safely settled in Bonn, the young Hajabi is busily selling drugs and purloined pornography while perfecting his ability to deliver bare-fisted beatdowns. Luckily, the Persian beauty (Sogol Faghani) he has his eye on will later forgive the vicious pummeling he gives an adversary right in front of her.Mixing war movie, coming-of-age drama and gangster thriller, Akin and Hajabi’s screenplay is a dispiriting brew of repellent behavior and odious rap lyrics. Incarceration ends the film’s parade of criminal conspiracies while kick-starting Hajabi’s singing career; but beneath the nefariousness we catch a glimpse of a more interesting story, one of dispossessed minorities repeatedly banding together to claim power in a new world.“Rhinegold” is not that movie. As its swaggering subject sniffs out another ally and a new angle, careless of the pain he’s causing his family, the picture seems almost impressed.“My kismet sucks,” Hajabi complains after one of his many setbacks. Somehow, I don’t think kismet was his problem.RhinegoldNot rated. Running time: 2 hours 18 minutes. In theaters. More