More stories

  • in

    ‘Star Trek: Picard’ Season 1, Episode 9 Recap: Split Personalities

    Season 1, Episode 9: ‘Et in Arcadia Ego, Part 1’In much of “Star Trek: The Next Generation,” the character Data is essentially a fish out of water. He is the lone android in a crowd of humanoids in almost all the rooms he is in. It falls on him to understand everyone else. In this week’s episode of “Star Trek: Picard,” we get a look at a world in which it is the humans who are the outsiders and the androids who are the dominant majority.All it takes is for the La Sirena to travel to the fourth planet of the Ghulion system to find what they’ve long been looking for: Soji’s home planet. Note how much of Picard is about the separate identities of similar-looking people. Rios has several hologram versions of himself to run his ship. Soji and Dahj are twin androids, which is to say nothing of the similar looking ones on their home planet, like Sutra. In the early episodes of “Picard,” we see Data. In “Et in Arcadia Ego, Part 1,” we see a Data look-alike, a human named Dr. Altan Inigo Soong.The crew heads to the Coppelius station, where they meet several androids. Arcana, one of the first androids the team encounters at Coppelius, refers to Picard as captain rather than admiral. That is, until Altan shows up and calls him admiral. It’s a subtle touch, emphasizing the contrast between the Picard Data knew back then and who Picard is now.It is always a pleasure to see Brent Spiner onscreen in “Trek,” Data or not. Spiner has played several Soongs in the history of “Trek,” including the semi-nefarious Dr. Arik Soong, who had an arc in “Star Trek: Enterprise.” Data’s father, Noonian Soong, was Data’s designer and, Altan presents himself as Noonian’s human son.Altan and Sutra seem to be in charge on Ghulion IV. Where the Zhat Vash see synthetic life as something to be stopped at all costs, Sutra sees an opportunity. After a mind-meld with Jurati in which she sees the Admonition, Sutra sees a premonition of sorts for android domination, as does Altan. (This same premonition is seen as a warning by Romulans.) There are other synthetics out there, the two note, and it’s time to bring them altogether. Screw organic life, Sutra says, much to Picard’s chagrin.Soji even turns on Picard, allowing him to be placed under house arrest. This wouldn’t be the first time an android had less-than-noble intentions in Trek, of course. Data’s brother Lore was a thorn in Picard’s side multiple times in the course of “The Next Generation.” It appears that Sutra takes more after him than Data.Much of this series has been set up to end in a battle between the Romulans and Picard. Now, we have a new layer to deal with: Picard isn’t trying only to save the synthetics from the Romulans, he also has to save them from themselves. But it feels a little late in the game to introduce a new villain when the first ones have barely been fleshed out. I realize there is another season of “Picard” coming, but I would have liked to learn a bit more about Narek and Rizzo.Picard’s relentless optimism, which somehow seems to be increasing with each episode, is one example of the show’s creators staying true to his core. On one hand, it seems that the androids should definitely follow Picard and let him lead them to a safe place. After all, he is true to his convictions and righteous. On the other, Sutra and Altan make a good point: Why would Starfleet ever listen to Picard if they haven’t in the past? Particularly after the Mars incident? If anything, the smart thing to do is to throw your lot in with synthetics who are smarter, stronger and quicker than anything coming their way.One way or another, fun episode, and I have no idea where this season ends.Odds and Ends:Jurati rightly asks if she’s still under arrest near the beginning of the episode. Rios says there’s been a change of plans. I imagine Jurati, in a very “Arrested Development” way, saying, “Well that was a freebie.” (Of course, she ends up siding with possibly homicidal androids by the end of the episode, so maybe Picard will regret not locking her up.)One of the best lines of the whole series is when Picard says, “Well, hope and the odds make poor bedfellows.” Of course, Picard delivers it with gusto.The scene when Picard says goodbye to Elnor on the crashed Borg cube is a touching one, and it has the emotional weight of mentor’s saying farewell to a mentee. Except that for much of this season, Elnor’s arc, if you can call it that, has been separate from Picard’s, so it felt a bit contrived. The terminal nature of Picard’s illness is brought up multiple times in this episode, including with Elnor. Every interaction he has is given with an air of finality. We know he is not dying this season, though.Spot 2! A clone of Data’s old cat was a nice callback.My assumption is that the Borg cube ends up being a crucial defense against the fleet of Romulan warbirds in the season finale. Otherwise, it seems like a waste of the most terrifying vessel in the history of “Star Trek.” It didn’t exactly do much in this episode. More

  • in

    Mal Sharpe, Groundbreaker in Street-Level Pranking, Dies at 83

    Two strangers approach a man named George on the streets of San Francisco.“George,” one of them says, “would you yourself participate in a program of inter-protoplasm flow?”George doesn’t hesitate. “If I needed it, I guess I would,” he says.One of the strangers, earnestly impressing on George the seriousness of that commitment, elaborates:“If you knew that you were going to have all of your — let’s face it — your insides taken out or sucked out of you and in return you were going to have the insides of another person placed into the interior of your body, either the insides of one other person or many other people, would you participate in such a program?”George again affirms, “Yes, if I needed it.” Only when the two try to get him to accompany them to a lab, right then and there, to have the procedure done does George balk.The two ersatz medical experts were Mal Sharpe and Jim Coyle, and the exchange, immortalized in an audio track, took place in the early 1960s, one of countless pranks the pair sprung on unsuspecting passers-by decades before “Impractical Jokers” and present-day late-night hosts thought of working similar comedic territory.Mr. Coyle stayed in the punking game only a short while, but Mr. Sharpe made something of a career out of it, influencing the whole field of ambush humor.“Coyle and Sharpe were pioneers of an entire genre of comedy, the Man on the Street bit,” Charlie Todd, founder of the comedy collective Improv Everywhere, said by email. “Every late-night host and YouTube prankster owes a bit of their act to Coyle and Sharpe.”Mr. Sharpe, who was well known in the Bay Area for his wacky interviews and also as a jazz trombonist, died on March 10 at his home in Berkeley, Calif. He was 83. His daughter, Jennifer Sharpe, said his health had diminished since he underwent heart surgery three and a half years ago.Mr. Sharpe first met Mr. Coyle in 1959 when they were bunking at the same San Francisco rooming house. Mr. Coyle asked Mr. Sharpe what he did for a living, and Mr. Sharpe said he specialized in animal-to-human brain transplants and was himself waiting to receive a flamingo brain. Mr. Coyle, in turn, gave Mr. Sharpe his biography: Although he looked 23, he said, he was 80 and had a pension from serving in the Spanish-American War.With such an introduction the two hit it off and began exchanging comedic ideas. They went their separate ways briefly, but returned to San Francisco in 1961 and began pranking in earnest.They used a tape recorder hidden in a briefcase to record their absurd encounters. Comedy albums were enjoying a surge of popularity, driven by the enormous success of Bob Newhart’s 1960 record, “The Button-Down Mind of Bob Newhart,” and the pair had hopes of landing a record deal with their recordings. Although the first company they tried rejected them, they were eventually signed by Warner Brothers Records, which in 1963 released “The Absurd Imposters.”Its track list gives the flavor of the enterprise: “Selling Insects to a Clothing Store” is one; “Carpenter, Give Us Your Lunch” another. And then there was “Mutant Zebra-Eel in a Paint Store,” in which they tried to persuade a merchant to exhibit a new life form in his shop window.“It’s a cross between a zebra and certain type of sea eel,” one of them explains, “and it’s almost entirely zebralike physically. The eel influence is only in the legs.”The album didn’t sell all that well, but disc jockeys started playing the cuts, and KGO radio in San Francisco signed the pair to do a show, “Coyle and Sharpe on the Loose.”“C & S, who had never done radio work before, were suddenly faced with the terror of filling 18 hours of airtime a week,” Jennifer Sharpe wrote in liner notes for a 1995 album drawn from the tapes from this period. To get better audio quality, they abandoned the hidden recorder and went to a straight-on interview method with microphone and recorder in full view.About a decade ago, Jesse Thorn, founder of the Maximum Fun podcast network, turned some of Coyle & Sharpe’s best material into bite-size podcasts.“What makes it work so amazingly,” Mr. Thorn said in a phone interview, “is that Jim was a genuine weirdo who was also an actual con man, and Mal was an actual cool guy who could pass for a square.”The moment — space exploration just beginning; science asserting itself — was also right, since many of the pair’s bits involved concepts that were on the edge of science fiction.“What you had,” Mr. Thorn said, “was people who were used to living in a world of wonder, and science is the one delivering the wonder.”Malcolm Sharpe was born on April 2, 1936, in Cambridge, Mass. His father, Ralph, who died when Malcolm was 4, managed a shoe store. His mother, Carolyn (Varnick) Sharpe, worked in a clothing store during World War II.Mr. Sharpe enrolled in Boston University’s public relations and communication program, earning a bachelor’s degree in 1958. He later pursued a master’s degree in broadcast communications at Michigan State University. His interest in jazz led him to San Francisco, drawn, he said, by an image on the cover of an album by the San Francisco jazz musician Turk Murphy.He and Mr. Coyle, who died in 1993, called their pranks “terrorizations,” but generally the pranksters and their targets parted as friends thanks to Mr. Sharpe’s genial personality.Well, except for that time the two got arrested.“We were interviewing this guy and told him that we wanted to borrow his car for a few hours to go to a restaurant,” Mr. Sharpe related to The New York Times in 2000. “He said, ‘How do I know you’re going to bring it back?’ We said that would be the great thing for him: We would bring it back and then he’d have more trust in human beings. And he called the police.”The two made a television pilot, but nothing came of it, and in the mid-1960s Mr. Coyle abandoned the partnership. Mr. Sharpe, though, kept doing on-the-street interviews, working in radio and advertising and releasing two albums on his own. In the early 1970s he had a nationally syndicated television show, “Street People.” He worked for several radio stations doing street interviews, and for years he was a host of “Back on Basin Street,” a jazz program on KCSM in the Bay Area. He also had his own jazz band, Big Money in Jazz.In 1964 Mr. Sharpe married Sandra Lee Wemple; in addition to his daughter, his wife survives him.The Coyle and Sharpe radio show lasted only two years. Although Mr. Sharpe did plenty of pranking on his own afterward, he told San Francisco Weekly in 1995 that his partnership with Mr. Coyle was in a class by itself.“You hate to think your best stuff was the first stuff you did, but in a way I’ve always felt that way,” he said. “That stuff was much more artistic, and had more validity and somehow was out there on a level that I really didn’t do again in many ways.” More

  • in

    Oberammergau Passion Play Canceled as Coronavirus Locks Down Germany

    In 1633, as the plague swept Europe, the villagers of Oberammergau prayed to God. They promised to perform the story of Jesus’s Passion — his life, death and resurrection — every 10 years, as long as God spared them from the horrors of the disease.Since then, the people of Oberammergau, in what is now Germany, have largely kept up their end of the bargain.But, on Thursday, the organizers of the play — which has a cast of some 2,500 and can feature 900 people onstage at once — announced they were canceling this year’s edition, because of the coronavirus pandemic.The first of the 103 daylong performances had been scheduled for May 16. The production will be delayed until 2022, the organizers said in a statement.Germany is on lockdown because of the virus, with large gatherings banned. On Wednesday, Chancellor Angela Merkel used a televised address to plead with people to obey restrictions and self-isolate.“This is serious,” Ms. Merkel said. “Take it seriously. Since German reunification — no, since World War II — our country has never faced a challenge where we depended so much on our collective actions and solidarity.”Each performance of the Passion Play would have been watched by around 4,500 people, many of whom would have traveled to Germany especially for the event. Organizers said in the statement that the decision was taken with the local health authorities, who decided that, even if Germany’s restrictions on large-scale gatherings were lifted by May, there would still be “a high risk of recurrent infections over a long period of time.”“At this stage, it can be clearly predicted that an event on the scale of the Passion Play is not feasible,” the health department of Garmisch-Partenkirchen, the local authority, said in the statement. “The risk is too high that new chains of infection will develop,” it added.This is not the first time an edition of the Passion Play has been canceled. In 1770, Elector Maximilian III, then Duke of Bavaria, banned all passion plays, as part of a drive against extravagance.Eight years later, a new ruler exempted Oberammergau from the ban, after it was “cleansed of all unsuitable improprieties,” according to the Passion Play’s website. After a thorough review, the villagers were given the go-ahead to stage the play in 1780.The 1920 edition was canceled because the village lost many musicians and actors in World War I, although the villagers voted to stage it again in 1922. In 1940, during World War II, the play was canceled entirely. Organizers began preparing for a 1947 edition, but this was called off over concerns about feeding and accommodating so many visitors during a period of postwar reconstruction.The cancellation is only the latest major European cultural event to fall victim to the pandemic this week. On Wednesday, the Eurovision Song Contest was canceled, as was the Glastonbury Music Festival. More

  • in

    Last Nights on London’s Stages, Before the Lights Went Out

    LONDON — Noël Coward wrote “Blithe Spirit” in a mere six days, and the perennially popular play opened on the West End in 1941, running for nearly 2,000 performances — setting a record in London for a nonmusical.Its longevity back then is in stark contrast with the most recent outing of the play here, with Jennifer Saunders, of “Absolutely Fabulous” fame, playing the bicycle-riding medium Madame Arcati, who communicates with the dead. A victim of circumstances beyond the control of even the most supernaturally minded, the director Richard Eyre’s comparatively somber revival played its last performance at the Duke of York’s Theater on March 14; the run had been due to finish on April 11.The production closed early after London’s West End theaters took coordinated action on Monday to close themselves down and help stop the spread of the coronavirus. London’s West End, like Broadway, has gone dark, and no one knows when the lights will come back on.As premature closings go, the timing here was somewhat ironic, when you consider how audiences throughout World War II flocked to “Blithe Spirit,” Coward’s inquiry into the frustrations, erotic and otherwise, of Charles (Geoffrey Streatfeild), a novelist whose first wife returns from the grave. (She died, we’re told, while recovering from pneumonia, which may well have had an eerie resonance for nervous playgoers today.)When she rises up, the mischievous Elvira (Emma Naomi) scatters calculated chaos in her wake. It’s giving nothing away to tell you that she ends up taking Charles’s second wife, the whiplash-tongued Ruth (Lisa Dillon, giving the performance of the night), over to the other side with her, though neither woman will go quietly from the land of the living. More

  • in

    Inside the Minds of Two Expert Improv Comedians

    Every Sunday night for six years, Louis Kornfeld and Rick Andrews have walked onstage at the Magnet Theater in Manhattan and created a refined hourlong play from scratch. These impromptu comedies stand out in a New York improv scene filled with quick-hit jokes and formulaic patterns, appearing more like scripted theater than almost any other improv show in the city.In an attempt to figure out how elite improvisers think so quickly, and on the same page, I debriefed with shorter, bearded Kornfeld, 38, and the taller, clean-shaven Andrews, 33, right after they left the stage, then again two days after their performance, with the assistance of video to try to break down the unspoken process they use to build a show together. (Though the theater has suspended operations because of the coronavirus, Kornfeld & Andrews and other shows normally staged there are being livestreamed on Twitch TV.)When Kornfeld and Andrews discuss their work, they can sound almost mystical, rarely talking about creating a show so much as discovering something that was already there. But what also becomes clear was that despite how effortless their shows seemingly come together, an extraordinary amount of action goes on inside their heads in every moment.The openingKornfeld: All we need to begin our show is the suggestion of a non-geographic location.”Audience member: “Bowling alley.”At the start of any improv scene, every move has a huge impact, providing a foundation that both constrains and inspires what comes next. With that audience suggestion, Andrews told me, he immediately imagined a rowdy St. Louis alley he used to visit, Tropicana Lanes, a bustling place with a lot of noise.They each grab a pair of chairs.Andrews sits down and strikes a pose of jaunty confidence, head swiveling to observe the chaos around him.As soon as Andrews took this posture, he started thinking about it and drawing conclusions: “It showed I was feeling good, but also trying to show that I’m feeling good, which is not the same thing,” he said.VideoThe chairs were critical. By having two extras, they decided they were at the lane, not at the bar or walking to get popcorn. That opened up the possibility that someone new might be coming. Andrews suspected someone was. Kornfeld had no idea. In his peripheral vision, Kornfeld saw the bouncy, assured energy of his partner, and he moved in the opposite direction.Kornfeld (trying to enter his name on a pretend computerized scoreboard): What do I shorten my name to?Andrews: Pete?Kornfeld: Nah. I want it to be —Andrews: And they only give you three letters? …Kornfeld: It feels weird for it to be Pet.And with that, an entire psychology and back story was born.“Once he named me Pete and then Pet would be my name, it instantly made me think it was insulting to think of someone as being like a pet,” Kornfeld recalled. “I knew immediately I felt small and insecure and reassured around this guy. I knew I would be slowly revealing my insecurities so you can beef me up and make me feel better about myself.”That sparked the question that would dominate the subtext of the first half of the show: What was making him so nervous? Andrews’s calm response to his friend’s insecurity clarified his character and the central relationship of the show. He didn’t tease or offer a big reaction. Part of this, Andrews said, is a strategy for opening scenes. “If you keep the energy steady,” he said, “you hear the notes of the characters over and over again and then it just helps slowly coming to an agreement about what’s happening.”But it was also a choice indicating this was a real friendship, and that he was playing someone trying to help. “If I bristled, that would suggest a dynamic where I’m poking you and making you feel hurt,” Andrews said, adding that he believed that for characters to remain interesting for an hour, you have to empathize with them.Kornfeld (deciding to input his friend’s name, Dou, short for Doug, first): You happy with that?Andrews: Yeah. I feel fine about it.Kornfeld: Back to Position 2. That didn’t buy me nearly enough time. I just feel like when the girls come here, I just don’t want to be Pet.Andrews had begun to think this might be romantic anxiety. But he wasn’t sure until he turned his head to look around, and Kornfeld fretted about being called Pet. Now both performers were on the same page: It’s a show about a double date.Andrews (after some disagreement over whether “adorable” is the right adjective for Pete): What’s your male machismo, what’s your attractiveness, what’s your main No. 1 selling point?Kornfeld: Oh, confidentiality.Andrews cited a theory by Keegan-Michael Key comparing improv comedy to a camera starting in a close-up and then slowly zooming out. But there comes a point where the picture frame gets set and that’s when Pete said his main selling point was “confidentiality.”VideoThis odd response (“It sounds like confident so it’s almost like it’s as close as I can get,” Kornfeld said later) got the show’s first big laugh. Andrews made a mental note: This will be useful later.The biggest fearKornfeld: I haven’t had sex in a, in a little bit.Andrews: OK. No judgment here.Once the opening situation and relationship has been established, the next step is to answer the central question of the show. “The audience needs one clear thing to explain why I feel so uncertain,” Kornfeld said, “this guy’s deepest fear.” He added that if you don’t push forward and “grab the trapeze,” the show risks losing momentum.Andrews: Days, months, years?Kornfeld: A couple years.Andrews: OK. Cool.Kornfeld: Four, five years.Andrews: More than a couple.Kornfeld: Maybe six.Andrews knew this was a familiar comic trope plumbed in movies like “The 40-year-Old Virgin,” and that’s why he was skeptical of it. There are cheap laughs to be had with a big response. “I am aware that people think this funny, but I don’t,” he said. “I actually feel at the heart of it, it’s just a person feeling vulnerable.”Noticing his partner’s posture and mood, he asked himself how a friend would respond and decided that the right move was to be generous and reassuring, to downplay the issue. So much anxiety is built around sex that the laughs will be there anywhere.Kornfeld: A dry spell.Andrews: A drought! Your libido is a desert now. It’s been deprived of water for quite a lot.Kornfeld: Yeah, it’s a moistureless libido. The days are hot and the nights are very, very cold.Andrews: Very cold. Few plants and animals can survive.Kornfeld: And the ones that can, real serious.Andrews: They’re special. A couple snakes. Some cacti.Kornfeld knew that Andrews was a fan of nature documentaries, and saw possibilities in his eyes. “I could tell right there you were thinking about ‘Planet Earth,’ the documentary,” Kornfeld told him.VideoThis back and forth is what these artists somewhat derisively call “a little bit of a move,” but it’s not only that. In real life, they said, friends joke with each other. And they do so with as much playfulness and specificity as possible. “I don’t subscribe to the Jerry Seinfeld school that some words are funny.” Andrews said, “It’s about how you say it and the context. Like when I say ‘cactuses’ and ‘snakes,’ they are picturing those actual things. But I could say that other things that were just as specific and probably would have gotten a similar kind of laugh.”The endgameKornfeld (after telling his date that Pete and Doug know each other from college when a third roommate had a breakdown that terrified them): Fear creates a strong imprint, and you become very imprint-vulnerable with another person in a very terrifying experience. And so we imprinted on each other and have been best friends ever since.Andrews (about to bowl but cringing as he hears the story): Pete’s really confidential.VideoFor 40 minutes, Andrews had “confidentiality” on his mind. He’d been waiting for the right opportunity to reintroduce it and this callback was the start of the endgame of the show. “In the first 10 minutes, you’re trying to get a sense of the layout, but we now know who these characters are and where the hot spots are,” Andrews said, explaining that there was more room for playfulness.Andrews (trying to play off a bowling misfire as if it was a strike): It bounced a little. Hey! There you go.In analyzing the implications of this move, Andrews also made a deeper callback to his first move: the way his posture performed confidence and happiness, suggesting it was merely a cover. Maybe he and his friend are both nervous. In trying to help his friend, he reacted too fast, making the situation more awkward, and revealing his own anxiety.Not all of this was operating on conscious level, Andrews said: “I wonder if that’s lingering in my brain, that I’m also nervous and futzing around before a date.”VideoAs the show moved toward the ending, what began as a small realistic scene about the anxiety before a date escalates into something more heightened and overtly comic.“We want to get to that exaggerated point so gradually that you don’t even realize that it’s been so exaggerated,” Kornfeld said. “By the end, this is no longer a real-life moment. It’s a ridiculous comedy moment. But we don’t want to start pounding that comedy moment so you expect more comedy moments. We want to get you there without seeing the work that got you there.” More

  • in

    What’s on TV Thursday: ‘Big Time Adolescence’ and ‘Feel Good’

    What’s StreamingBIG TIME ADOLESCENCE (2020) Stream on Hulu. Pete Davidson plays a role model with platinum blond hair and a taste for weed in this coarse coming-of-age comedy, the debut film of the writer-director Jason Orley. The plot centers on a brotherly relationship between Davidson’s character, a 23-year-old named Zeke, and Mo (Griffin Gluck), his ex-girlfriend’s 16-year-old younger brother, whom he walks through the finer points of the suburban slacker lifestyle. The story also involves small-time drug dealing and Mo’s pursuit of a crush (played by Oona Laurence). “Though Davidson, Gluck and Laurence show star potential, Orley either boxes them into a too-conventional coming-of-age arc or gives them cloyingly charming characteristics,” Kristen Yoonsoo Kim wrote in her review for The New York Times. “Despite some moments of tenderness and easy chemistry between Zeke and Mo,” Kim added, “‘Big Time Adolescence’ doesn’t have enough heart or humor to save it from becoming just another movie about white dudes bro-ing out.”THE 400 BLOWS (1959) Rent on Amazon, Google Play, iTunes, Vudu and YouTube. More roving adolescent mischief can be found in this drama, a foundational work of the French New Wave and the debut movie of François Truffaut. The film follows Antoine Doinel (Jean-Pierre Léaud), a 12-year-old truant causing trouble on the streets of Paris. When it was released in the United States in 1959, Bosley Crowther referred to it as “a small masterpiece” in his review for The Times. “Where previous films on similar subjects have been fatted and fictionalized with all sorts of adult misconceptions and sentimentalities,” he wrote, “this is a smashingly convincing demonstration on the level of the boy — cool, firm and realistic, without a false note or a trace of goo.”FEEL GOOD Stream on Netflix. “Can you just lie on top of me and tell me something Canadian?” That question comes early in this romantic-comedy series, which stars the comedian Mae Martin as a version of herself, a Canadian in London. Making the request is George (Charlotte Ritchie), an English woman whom Mae begins dating. Much of the drama comes from a pair of struggles: George, who hasn’t dated a woman before, is hesitant to come out to her family and friends, and Mae is a recovering addict. “It’s a work of fiction,” Martin recently told the British newspaper The Guardian. “But it’s got an emotional truth, because it’s based on experiences I’ve had.”What’s on TVAFTER TRUTH: DISINFORMATION AND THE COST OF FAKE NEWS (2020) 9 p.m. on HBO. In his 2011 documentary, “Page One: Inside The New York Times,” the filmmaker Andrew Rossi explored the inner workings of The Times at a moment when the paper was struggling to adapt to the internet age. His latest doc, “After Truth,” looks at one of the biggest issues to spike in media since: disinformation, and the way untruths are spread through social media. More

  • in

    Straining From Shutdowns, Theaters Ask Playwrights to Return Payments

    In a sign that American theaters are desperately worried about the impact of the coronavirus pandemic, playwrights are reporting that they have been asked to return payments for productions that have been canceled or postponed.Two Pulitzer Prize-winning playwrights, Lynn Nottage and Annie Baker, said on Twitter that they had been asked to refund money paid for forthcoming productions, and that they were resisting the requests. The two are among the nation’s most heralded living playwrights, and their work is regularly performed around the country.Just happened to me.— Annie Baker (@AnnieNBaker) March 18, 2020
    The Dramatists Guild of America, a national trade association representing playwrights and composers, said it had heard the same from less well-known writers as well, and denounced the practice. The requests, the guild said, have been coming from nonprofit theaters, which depend on a combination of philanthropy and ticket sales to stay afloat; some of those theaters have also been asking ticketholders for canceled shows to consider donating the value of their tickets, rather than seeking refunds.“Our request to the theatrical community is to stop scapegoating the dramatists at this unprecedented time,” the guild said in a statement Wednesday, “and our advice to dramatists confronted by these demands is to just say no, with the full knowledge that it was unfair for you to be put in this position in the first place.”An advance is an amount of money paid by a theater to a writer for the right to produce a play. According to Ralph Sevush, the guild’s general counsel, advance payments generally range from $500 to $10,000, and are usually contractually guaranteed to a writer, even if the production never happens. “Every contract I’ve seen says options and advances are nonrefundable,” he said.Writers, who are among the few theater industry workers who are not unionized, also then earn some money from a royalty — perhaps a percentage of the box office — when their show is produced by a nonprofit, and then sometimes earn money from licensing fees for future productions.“Since writers aren’t unionized, they don’t have collectively bargained compensation, they don’t get health insurance, and they don’t get unemployment,” Sevush said. “A few thousand dollars to a theater is really paper clip money, whereas for a writer it’s grocery money, it’s rent money — it allows them to keep working.”Sevush said he would not name the theaters seeking their money back because “we prefer them to accept our advice and not alienate them to the point where we have to expose them to public ridicule.”But in response to a question from The New York Times, the Center Theater Group in Los Angeles acknowledged that it was responsible for the request to Baker. The theater’s artistic director, Michael Ritchie, and managing director, Meghan Pressman, issued a joint statement on Thursday, calling the move a mistake:We are deeply committed to the art of theater and we pride ourselves on supporting everyone involved in bringing their work to our stages. In the moments after we learned that the County of Los Angeles had closed our theaters and that we would need to cancel performances for a still-undetermined amount of time, we felt it critical to take stock and figure out what the baseline of our financial commitments were in the coming weeks and months so we could attempt to chart a path forward that would be as fair as possible to all of our artists, staff and crew that have been impacted by this truly unprecedented moment. In that hurried cancellation process, we automatically reached out to Samuel French to assess all our financial commitments surrounding the upcoming production of ‘The Antipodes,’ which needed to be canceled before going into previews. As we moved beyond our initial steps and realized our mistake in asking the playwright to return a payment, we took actions to rescind the request.Baker, who won the Pulitzer for “The Flick,” did not respond to a request for comment. Nottage, who has won two Pulitzer Prizes, for “Ruined” and “Sweat,” declined to identify the theater that asked her for a payback, other than to say that it is a “large regional” theater. “Everyone is in pain and I really do not want anyone suffering, including theaters,” she said. A spokesman for the League of Resident Theaters, which represents 75 major American regional theaters, did not respond to a request for comment. More

  • in

    54% of the People. 12% of the Plays. Atlanta, Do We Have a Problem?

    ATLANTA — On a torrentially rainy night last month, some 200 members of the theatrical community here gathered in an arty underground event space for what was billed as the Atlanta Theater Dinner. It was not an awards ceremony or a gala fund-raiser. The meal was potluck and the entertainment unusual: a bare-bones, script-in-hand reading of a 15-minute play by local black and Latino actors. Their aim was to spark what one of them called a “deep and overdue” conversation about race and representation in their field.The play’s title was “Dear Atlanta Theater,” reflecting the authors’ affection for their hometown but also the serious need to talk. Though Atlanta is part of the second-largest black-majority metropolitan area in the United States, and its bustling professional theaters staged 187 productions last year, only 22 were by playwrights of color. (Of the 22 playwrights, one was Asian-American, one Latino.) Having compiled those statistics, the authors concluded that no other phrase properly described them but “white supremacy.”Because this is the Deep South, and because actors naturally ingratiate, the message was gently broached: not with the intention of punching but of pinching, as another author put it. Anecdotes of unconscious hostility collected from local theater makers of color were delivered as if part of a standup act. Sound designers were ribbed for buying mics that blend only with white complexions; lighting designers were reminded that “amber isn’t the only color of light that works on brown skin!”Still, the play’s conclusion was uncouched. In a community where presenting one “black show” a year — usually in February — counts as diversity for many theaters, and where one or two cast members of color count as equity, the definition of “inclusion,” the authors wrote, had been stretched “so thin that we don’t have to change any of our behavior at all.”Over the course of five days in Atlanta that same week, before coronavirus restrictions upended schedules everywhere, I met some of the people who devised “Dear Atlanta Theater,” as well as some who took part in the spirited discussions over rice and beans and honey-baked ham that went on for two hours afterward. I also spoke with several theater leaders in the city of half a million and saw a number of productions that, in complicated titrations of good faith, bore out the themes the authors had raised.Throughout, I was reminded of my own backyard. Far from carpetbagging, I had come to Atlanta to see whether a city that has long been a magnet for the black middle class is dealing any better with these matters than New York does — which is to say, not very well. A report by the Asian American Performers Action Coalition covering the 2016-17 Broadway and Off Broadway season, the last for which figures are available, found that “Caucasian playwrights wrote a whopping 86.8 percent of all shows produced” — a figure even more lopsided than Atlanta’s.But in other ways Atlanta’s theatrical ecosystem is more lopsided than New York’s. At its pinnacle sits the Alliance Theater, a regional flagship with a national reputation and an annual budget of $16 million. The next-largest theaters top out around $2 million.You can see what the Alliance’s money buys. At its 650-seat Coca-Cola Stage, I caught a performance of “Maybe Happy Ending,” a charming, Broadway-ready new musical about robots in love by Will Aronson and Hue Park. That it featured a largely Asian-American cast suggested a successful effort to program and hire with inclusion in mind. At the 200-seat Hertz stage, “Seize the King” — Will Power’s hip-hop retelling of “Richard III” — was preparing to open.And though, yes, it was February, Susan V. Booth, the theater’s artistic director, said her goal is to make the entire season of 11 shows welcoming to diverse audiences. “It’s not just white play, white play, black-history-month black play, white play, which is how regional theaters used to show they were woke,” she said. “Because if your programing arc is episodic, the same will hold true in your audience.” Indeed, at many Atlanta theaters, black theatergoers and white ones barely intersect.“What’s absolutely crucial is who’s doing the inviting,” Booth added, pointing as an example to Pearl Cleage, the Atlanta-based black writer whose “Blues for an Alabama Sky” and “What I Learned in Paris,” among many others, have had their premieres at the Alliance. “We set ticket expectations for Pearl’s new plays as if they were musicals because when Pearl is inviting, she packs out the house.”Even so, Booth, who is white, admitted that the Alliance’s audiences overall are not as diverse as she’d like: “something like 30 percent to 35 percent nonwhite.” (On Broadway, the figure is closer to a quarter.) I did not observe even that much melanin the night I saw “Maybe Happy Ending,” despite its Korean setting — but in any case, Booth said, “statistical diversity is not the goal.”True. But it’s a good step, right?“The goal is that we sit cheek by jowl with as much of a breadth of human experience as we can, not erasing human difference but unearthing what unites us.”I certainly had that experience the next evening when I saw Jocelyn Bioh’s “School Girls; or, the African Mean Girls Play” at Kenny Leon’s True Colors Theater. Even though I was one of the few white people in the audience, the breadth of human experience — by age and gender and style if not race — was strongly represented. The audience’s engagement with the play itself, a recent hit Off Broadway, was likewise palpable, with hoots and gasps and back talk that enhanced the comedy as well as the dramatic turns.Apparently, that’s often the case at True Colors, which performs at an arts center in Cascade, a middle-class black neighborhood 12 miles southwest of the Alliance in Midtown. Most of the three plays the company produces each season are by black authors, and all of them address black lives, so it does not have to work hard to let people know who’s “doing the inviting.”For a time, the inviter was Kenny Leon himself, who left the artistic directorship of the Alliance in 2000 to co-found True Colors. Now that he has moved on to national projects, including the recent Broadway production of “A Soldier’s Play,” the theater is led by Jamil Jude, who as a producer in Minneapolis found himself having to “sell people on the idea that black stories are valid.” When he arrived in Atlanta in 2017 to work at True Colors and first encountered “300-plus black people in the house,” he told himself, “I can’t go back.”But if running a $1.5 million black theater solves some aesthetic problems (no “white gaze” issues!), it raises some existential ones. “The case has been made that white theaters in Atlanta have an easier time getting funding for black plays than black theaters do,” Jude told me, delicately addressing the suggestion I have heard around town that the Alliance, as one administrator put it, “sucks up all the foundation and corporate money.”In any case, when black plays are produced, it is usually by white hands. For that reason, Jude no longer focuses on the larger market but on what a black theater can uniquely provide. “Rather than fight what white theaters do, I want to make a safe space for artists of color.”That’s not a viable approach for theaters whose missions (and financial models) depend on diversity. “I have to keep my white audience because they are funding the season,” said Lisa Adler, artistic director of Horizon Theater, with an annual budget of about $1.5 million. “So if I’m producing five plays, two that are specifically for black audiences are the most I can do.” One of those — “The Light,” by Loy A. Webb — was about to begin rehearsals when I was visiting; already onstage was “Once,” which Adler called “the whitest musical ever.”If the phrase “separate but equal” comes to mind, Adler’s experience is that audiences can gradually be encouraged to cross over, in both directions. “If they feel comfortable in how you tell their story they become comfortable hearing other people’s,” she said.That seemed to be the goal at Actor’s Express as well, except with more elements of diversity in play. “Atlanta has one of the most active L.G.B.T.Q. communities in the country,” Freddie Ashley, the theater’s artistic director, told me. “And a large Jewish audience as well.”Yet with a budget of just $1.2 million, reaching everyone with five or six shows a season is a tricky business. Recent productions include local professional premieres of “An Octoroon” by Branden Jacobs-Jenkins, “Skintight” by Joshua Harmon and, while I was in town, “Fun Home,” the musical about a gay father and daughter by Lisa Kron and Jeanine Tesori.That seven of the nine “Fun Home” roles were played by white actors may follow from the story, in which most of the characters are members of a single family. But while admiring Ashley’s moving production, I couldn’t help thinking of something Cynthia D. Barker, a local actor who is black, told me. “Artistic directors look at the season,” she said. “Actors look for plays written for them.” When she studies the annual announcements, she’s thinking: “Look, there’s one for me there! Two for me there! Or, too often, none for me there.”Barker was one of the team that devised “Dear Atlanta Theater,” which arose from earlier work she’d done with a tiny, innovative company called Out of Hand. Ariel Fristoe, Out of Hand’s artistic director, said that the company’s mission, since its founding in 2001, has been to use “the tools of theater to work for social justice” through “intimate experiences in unusual places.”Because Out of Hand’s annual budget has never been higher than $300,000, that used to mean in cars and parks. More recently, the model has changed. Out of Hand’s production of “Conceal and Carry,” a one-man play about gun violence by Sean Christopher Lewis, is performed in the homes of people who agree to serve as hosts even if they may not agree about the right to bear arms. To date, more than 1,000 guests have attended the 43 performances, which generally lead, with the help of cocktails, to facilitated discussions that get emotional fast.“Dear Atlanta Theater” grew out of this model and was, for Barker, a chance to get other people in the community thinking a little about the things she thinks about a lot. Like the way, before a show at a white theater, she sometimes finds herself peeking from behind the curtain and counting the people of color she sees in the audience — usually on her fingers, occasionally needing her toes. “If I have time to do that and get an accurate count,” she said, “there’s a problem.”She’s pretty sure the problem isn’t about intentions but marketing: a failure to foster relationships with patrons of color for all shows, “not just the summer or February slot.”It would be nice to think so, because marketing can be adjusted. And Out of Hand has shown that at the right price point — the top ticket for “Conceal and Carry” is $30 — diverse audiences will engage in difficult material together.Yet I can’t help wondering whether engagement really leads to change, and whether theater, not designed for that purpose, can be adapted to it. Do people who share feelings after a play continue to share them later? At the end of the Atlanta Theater Dinner, audience members were asked to commit to “one concrete action” they would take to improve representation and equity in their backyard. The commitments, though worthy, seemed small: to speak up more in the face of microaggressions; to read more plays by people of color; to go to shows at True Colors.Ariel Fristoe wasn’t fazed. “It takes just a small perspective shift to use theatrical skills to create a more just world,” she said. “I’m shocked at how well it works.”Barker, too, was firm. “We are in Atlanta,” she said. By which I took her to mean that if it can’t be done here, where can it be? More