Movies

We look at the finest in science fiction, horror, action and international films, all available to stream.Science Fiction‘Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga’It’s been an odd year for science fiction. One of the best such narratives was the Broadway musical “Maybe Happy Ending,” set in 2064 Seoul and in which two obsolete robots fall in love. Streaming series gave us an astounding range of stories and aesthetics, from “Sugar” to “Fallout” to “Dune: Prophecy.”Feature films, on the other end, tended to be split between insipid or downright inept mega-budget productions and indies that often recycled similar premises.Thank God, then, for George Miller, whose “Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga” reminded us what cinema can do. This prequel to “Mad Max: Fury Road” recounts how Furiosa (Alyla Browne as a kid, Anya Taylor-Joy as a young woman) ended up in the Citadel run by Immortan Joe (Lachy Hulme), and how she lost an arm.The movie is in a constant escalation of one-upmanship, though Miller is only competing with himself at this point. Why settle for one madman, for instance, when you can stick your heroine in a power struggle between two of them? So the director introduces the warlord Dementus, played by a Chris Hemsworth unabashedly flirting with camp. While it is operatically berserk, “Furiosa” also has a stylish, virtuosic classicism. Miller did not wreck his legacy.— ELISABETH VINCENTELLIStream “Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga” on Max.Horror‘In a Violent Nature’Ry Barrett in the film “In a Violent Nature.”Pierce Derks/IFC Films/ShudderIn a year of humdrum haunted houses and soulless spirits, Chris Nash’s slasher film “In a Violent Nature” was a brutal knockout — a surprise too, considering that it’s as placid as it is gruesome.We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More

Nicole Kidman’s eyes widened. “Haven’t you been to the Rockettes?” she asked. “I go every year. Oh yeah, I’m obsessed!”Over celery root soup at the Empire Diner in Manhattan last week, the 57-year-old Oscar winner regaled me with stories about the high-kicking Christmas spectacular, which she had attended the night before with her children and husband, the singer Keith Urban: “I was saying to my husband, ‘Why do we love it so much?’ And he said, ‘Because it’s a memory. You’re remembering the kid in you.’”Lately, Kidman has been thinking a lot about this sort of thing, tracing her life and career as part of a continuum. Her new film, “Babygirl,” is one such reconnection: Though she has recently been seen in splashy streaming series like “The Perfect Couple” and “Lioness: Special Ops,” it marks a return to the kind of risky, auteur-driven filmmaking she used to be acclaimed for.Directed by Halina Reijn, “Babygirl” stars Kidman as Romy, a put-together chief executive with a doting husband (Antonio Banderas) but an unsatisfying sex life: Afraid to explore her desire to be dominated, Romy finds her kink fulfilled by a young intern (Harris Dickinson) with whom she embarks on a tumultuous affair. “It’s very exposing,” Kidman admitted of the sexually charged film. When she watched it for the first time with an audience, she felt so naked and vulnerable that she buried her head in Reijn’s chest.Nicole Kidman said she was able to shoot the intimate sex scenes by telling herself, “Don’t think of this being seen by anybody.”“Babygirl” could earn Kidman her sixth Oscar nomination and has already won her the prestigious Volpi Cup for best actress at the Venice Film Festival in September, though Kidman had to miss that ceremony after the death of her mother, Janelle, at 84. The two were quite close and her passing has put Kidman in a contemplative mood: Over the course of our conversation, she discussed not just “Babygirl” but also her mother’s unrealized ambitions and the difficulties that thwart female fulfillment, tackling those topics in a surprisingly unguarded way.We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More

This documentary about Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel looks at the corruption investigation and his enduring grip on the government.“The Bibi Files” opens by promising to show viewers leaked videos from the police investigation of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel (ubiquitously known as Bibi), who is currently standing trial on corruption charges. The videos, a title card says, “are being shown for the first time in this film.”But in some ways the interrogation footage is the least interesting part of this documentary, directed by Alexis Bloom (“Divide and Conquer: The Story of Roger Ailes”). After decades in the public eye, Netanyahu and his wife, Sara, are both practiced stonewallers, while their son Yair accuses the officers questioning him of being “a police force of Mafiosos” and participating in a “witch hunt.” More surprising are the snippets from the investigators’ interviews with Miriam Adelson and husband, Sheldon, the hotel and casino magnate who died in 2021. These longtime Netanyahu allies here sound, in admittedly brief clips, like they’re trying to distance themselves from Bibi and Sara.Beyond the videos, the movie takes a thorough, methodical approach to laying out the case against Netanyahu, even if few of its arguments are new. Bloom and her camera subjects trace, over decades, his strengthening grip on the Israeli government, his apparent taste for luxury items and his aggressiveness in stifling criticism. Avi Alkalay, the former editor in chief of the news website Walla, owned by a Netanyahu associate, recalls being pressured to make the publication’s coverage less critical. (The code words, he says, were “less paprika.”) Netanyahu is described as expending precious political capital with John Kerry, then the U.S. secretary of state, to get a visa renewed for the producer Arnon Milchan, who, according to prosecutors, had given the Netanyahus hundreds of thousands of dollars’ worth of gifts.And if claims about back-scratching, cigars and champagne may seem inconsequential in the grand scheme of Netanyahu’s rule, the film furthers the oft-made case that his methods of avoiding accountability have jeopardized Israel’s security. The documentary examines his alliance with far-right politicians and his continued pursuit of the war in Gaza, which, multiple interviewees argue, no longer has any achievable objective.Many of the most potent statements come from Raviv Drucker, an investigative reporter and a producer of the documentary, and Uzi Beller, a childhood friend who began speaking out against the prime minister. (The first time we see him, he makes clear that he wants to distinguish between two men: He calls them “my kind of Bibi,” rather than “the crowd kind of Bibi,” and “Netanyahu.”)Less persuasive is the film’s portrayal of Sara Netanyahu as a kind of Lady Macbeth figure. (“I think Bibi is afraid of Sara,” says Hadas Klein, a former assistant to Milchan.) That may or may not be accurate, but the characterization has the effect of making excuses for Netanyahu’s own maneuvering. “He knows what he’s doing,” Beller says. “It’s not that he doesn’t know.”The Bibi FilesNot rated. Running time: 1 hour 55 minutes. In theaters. More

“Her Story” touches on sensitive topics in China, like censorship and gender inequality. But its humorous, nonconfrontational approach may have helped it pass censors.The movie calls out stigmas against female sexuality and stereotypes about single mothers. It name-drops feminist scholars, features a woman recalling domestic violence and laments Chinese censorship.This is not some indie film, streamed secretly by viewers circumventing China’s internet firewall. It is China’s biggest movie right now — and has even garnered praise from the ruling Communist Party’s mouthpiece.The success of “Her Story,” a comedy that topped China’s box office for the last three weeks, is in some ways unexpected, at a time when the government has cracked down on feminist activism, encouraged women to embrace marriage and childbearing and severely limited independent speech. The film’s reception reflects the unpredictable nature of censorship in the country, as well as the growing appetite for female-centered stories. Discussion of women’s issues is generally allowed so long as it does not morph into calls for rights. “Her Story,” which some have called China’s answer to “Barbie,” cushions many of its social critiques with jokes.The director of “Her Story,” Shao Yihui, has emphasized at public appearances that she is not interested in provoking “gender antagonism,” an accusation that official media has sometimes lobbed against feminists.At a time of sluggish growth and anemic ticket sales, movie producers — and perhaps government regulators — have been eager to attract female audience members, an increasingly important consumer base. Other recent hit movies have also been directed by and starred women, including the year’s top box office performer, “YOLO.”We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More

Two incarcerated men navigate parole boards in a documentary that asks the question: Should the guiding principle of criminal justice be retribution or rehabilitation?Peering into the heart of the beast we call the justice system, the directors Ricki Stern and Jesse Sweet zero in on parole, a part of the process that usually unfolds behind closed doors. “Nature of the Crime” offers rare glimpses of the make-or-break interviews that, in more cases than not, deny petitioners their longed-for second chance. As it traces, over a four-year period, the cycles of hope and despair for two incarcerated men — both in New York prisons for crimes committed in the state — this quiet and affecting documentary is at once an argument for reform and a soul-searching question: Should the guiding principle of criminal justice be retribution or rehabilitation?The men at the center of the film have been behind bars for more than 30 years. Todd Scott was 19 when he was charged, alongside three others, with the killing of a rookie police officer in Queens. Chad Campbell was charged at 14 with committing a horrific double murder in his upstate hometown. Speaking to the filmmakers, and in conversations with their devoted pro bono attorneys, they are thoughtful and sincere. When they also recall the abuse they suffered as children, they provide context, not excuses.For Scott and Campbell, the past is not mere prologue, but an ever-present, insurmountable barrier. The film’s title refers to a boilerplate bit of legalese that many New York parole boards invoke, a catch-22 that essentially denies the possibility of redemption. When Scott asks, “How can you be more remorseful?,” he’s speaking in terms both practical and philosophical. “Nature of the Crime” doesn’t sugarcoat the offenses, but, looking head-on at the offenders and where they are now, it asks that we do the same.Nature of the CrimeNot rated. Running time: 1 hour 29 minutes. Watch on Max. More

This personal film is a dynamic, even chaotic, collage of moments that bring the director back to his beginnings.Love poem, restless dream, troubled history, alchemist’s scrapbook — Leos Carax’s “It’s Not Me” is pure cinema as it dances through its dense 42 minutes. He crafted this indelibly personal and eccentric film in response to a prompt he was given from the Pompidou Center in Paris: “Where are you at, Leos Carax?”The answer sends the filmmaker, 64, back to beginnings. That means reflections on bad dads, artistic inspirations, his piano-playing daughter, and the 20th century in all its light and darkness, its movies and mass destruction. Carax creates a dynamic, even chaotic, collage of moments — including Denis Lavant and Juliette Binoche in clips from his movies “Mauvais Sang” (1986) and “Holy Motors” (2012) — alongside quotations and songs. (Among the audiovisual references: David Bowie, Jonas Mekas, the Apollo 17 astronauts, Nina Simone, Tintin, The Fall.)“It’s Not Me” displays the “can he do that?” spark that made his features cinematic events, here on a shaggier, smaller scale. Carax’s smoky voice-over, bold title cards and patchwork style might evoke Jean-Luc Godard’s later enigmas, but the film feels more like late-night conversations with a beloved, weirdo friend. How can you not love a filmmaker who portrays his writing method as scribbling in his sleep, surrounded by pets?One idea the film nurtures is that speed is of the essence (and the definition of motion pictures). You can slow down and pore over its references, or you can let Carax’s cinematic flow glide you along. The lovely “Annette”-inspired coda should bring a twinkle to your eye.It’s Not MeNot rated. Running time: 42 minutes. In theaters and available to rent or buy on most major platforms. More

Anyone who follows the Oscar race knows it can get nasty. Over the long arc of awards season, films can fall in and out of favor, villains can emerge, and campaigns can be ferocious in their pursuit of gold statues. But movie fans aren’t used to the vitriol that comes along with pop music. Now, they are getting a taste.This year two major pop stars have big roles in notable movies, both of which happen to be musicals. Ariana Grande is the pink-clad mean girl Glinda in “Wicked,” and Selena Gomez plays a cartel boss’s wife in “Emilia Pérez.” While these women have been nothing but nice to one another in the press, their stans, or armies of supporters, have been going to war and drawing unsuspecting bystanders into the battle.Pop music fans are notoriously ruthless — far more so than movie lovers. Their loyalty is unwavering to the point that they take aim at anyone who dare criticize their beloved stars. Perceived slights have resulted in threats and doxxing. And now they have a stake in the Oscars. It’s causing chaos.It’s not as if pop stars have never competed for movie prizes. Cher and Barbra Streisand might have something to say about that. More recently Lady Gaga was nominated in 2019 for her role in “A Star Is Born.” But rarely have two pop idols gone head to head in the way Grande and Gomez are. The notion of a rivalry gained even more fuel this week when they both landed in the same supporting actress category in the Golden Globe nominations.Not that Grande and Gomez seem to have any personal beef. In an October red carpet interview, Gomez said she was “just excited to see Ariana’s movie.” Grande then posted on Instagram: “and we cannot wait for Emilia Perez,” adding a message to Gomez, “I just adore you.”But you would not know that these lovely words had been exchanged if you look at how their fans are acting on X.We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More

The movie received 10 nods, leading the field. Angelina Jolie, Timothée Chalamet, Pamela Anderson and Zendaya drew acting nominations.The point of the Golden Globes has become clearer in recent years: It’s a cash register masquerading as an awards show — an opportunity to sell advertising, promote winter movies and flog designer gowns.Celebrity attendance makes the whole thing run, of course, and so trophies are dangled as bait. On Monday, the companies behind the Globes announced the 2025 list of nominees, and — ka-ching! — there are a ton of stars on it, including Angelina Jolie, Timothée Chalamet, Zoe Saldaña, Nicole Kidman, Jamie Foxx, Jake Gyllenhaal, Ariana Grande, Keira Knightley, Pamela Anderson, Zendaya, Demi Moore, Glen Powell, Selena Gomez, Daniel Craig, Kate Winslet, Miley Cyrus and Denzel Washington.Netflix’s “Emilia Pérez,” a Spanish-language musical exploring trans identity, received 10 nominations, the most of any movie, including one for best comedy or musical. “The Brutalist,” “Conclave,” “Wicked” and “Anora” will be among the other films contending for the top prizes, with “The Bear,” “Shogun,” “Only Murders in the Building” and “Baby Reindeer” among the programs vying for the TV equivalents.Notable nominations included Winslet, a surprise double nominee for “Lee,” a little-seen biopic with mediocre reviews, and “The Regime,” a poorly reviewed HBO mini-series. The best director category included Coralie Fargeat for her satirical body horror film “The Substance” and Payal Kapadia for “All We Imagine Is Light,” about a Mumbai nurse; both women will now figure more prominently in the Oscar conversation.And the notable omissions? Danielle Deadwyler (“The Piano Lesson”) and Marianne Jean-Baptiste (“Hard Truths”), both perceived as potential Oscar nominees, were among several Black performers who did not make the list. Similarly, the prison drama “Sing Sing” was largely passed over, although its star, Colman Domingo, received a nod.We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More