More stories

  • in

    ‘Rise of the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles’ Review: More Turtle Power

    This continuation of the half-shelled foursome’s saga is rendered in snappy and brightly-colored animation.“Rise of the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: The Movie” won’t convert any new fans to the heroes in a half-shell, unless they’re under the age of 10. Still, it may pleasantly surprise parents looking for an afternoon cartoon movie to watch with their kids.From Netflix and Nickelodeon, “Rise of the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles” ties into the animated series of the same name, which ran for two seasons between 2018 and 2020. The four reptilian brothers — Leonardo (voiced by Ben Schwartz), Raphael (Omar Benson Miller), Donatello (Josh Brener) and Michelangelo (Brandon Mychal Smith) — have been given more distinctive character designs to better reflect their individual personalities.April O’Neil (Kat Graham), formerly a redheaded television reporter (and, often, damsel-in-distress) in the 1980s cartoon, is now a Black university student with a more varied skill set for helping the turtles get out of a jam. Together with their rodent mentor Splinter (Eric Bauza), they face their biggest challenge yet when Leo’s future student Casey Jones (Haley Joel Osment) time-travels back to New York circa 2022 to ask the turtles’ help in defeating the Krang, a half-robotic alien species set on — what else? — taking over the world.Directed by Ant Ward and Andy Suriano, the film keeps the plot streamlined to better focus on the swashbuckling action and heartfelt (if emotionally simplistic) relationship between the four turtles, particularly Leo and his overbearing older brother Raph. The animation style is snappy and brightly-colored, providing a nice change of pace from the slate-colored blockbusters currently dominating theater screens. And there’s even some good humor to be found here, including a few location-specific jokes that’ll make New Yorkers chuckle. All in all, “Rise” is as dependable as a Manhattan slice: not mind-blowing in the slightest, but just delightfully cheesy enough to keep kids and adults alike satisfied.Rise of the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: The MovieNot rated. Running time: 1 hour 22 minutes. Watch on Netflix. More

  • in

    ‘Wedding Season’ Review: Much ‘I Do’ About Nothing

    To appease their moms, a pair of Indian American entrepreneurs pretend at romance over a spate of nuptials in this soulless romantic comedy on Netflix.The jejune romantic comedy “Wedding Season” marries elements from a couple of recent entries to the genre: “Plus One” and “7 Days.” The former mirrors the framing device of a flurry of nuptials; the latter, the cultural details specific to Indian diaspora families. While neither likely informed the creation of this Netflix trifle directed by Tom Dey (“Failure to Launch”), these narrative echoes in tandem with a host of other clichés give the impression that the movie was composed by a trends-tracking algorithm.The story begins when two mothers, impatient for their grown children to find mates, stage coups over their online dating profiles. The stunt results in an encounter between Asha (Pallavi Sharda), a workaholic microfinance entrepreneur, and Ravi (Suraj Sharma), a renowned dance music D.J. The pair initially clash, but pledge to simulate romance during a spate of summer weddings to get the Indian aunties off their backs.Bland montages trace the arc of these reluctant suitors, and although Sharda and Sharma are appealing performers, their relations lack surprise and soul. Against the arid backdrop of their growing attraction, what stands out is a peculiar focus on cash flow; for a movie that often waves logistics aside — how these practical strangers collected invites to scores of the same ceremonies, for instance — there’s a deluge of dialogue surrounding the particulars of Asha and Ravi’s finances. “Wedding Season” is mostly flavorless, but its interest in capitalistic success inspires a pucker of bad taste.Wedding SeasonNot rated. Running time: 1 hour 38 minutes. Watch on Netflix. More

  • in

    Four Movies About Summer to Stream Now

    It’s hot. Stay in and cool down with these streaming picks.Beach reads, grilled corn, baseball: These are the indulgences of summer. Movies too, especially when it’s hot as blazes outside and the coolest remedy is to stay at home with a film and a pitcher of cold lemonade.Summer is the season for fantasyland, for getaway cinema, which is why we asked each of our genre columnists to choose a streamable film that screams summer. Blame it on topsy-turvy 2022, but their picks turned out to be not all that sun-kissed. Instead, there’s a runaway bus, an alien invasion, a woodland psychopath and sweaty elitists with blasé dispositions.In these films, it’s summertime all right, but the livin’ ain’t easy. It sure is fun to watch, though.Action‘Speed’ (1994)Rent it on Amazon or YouTube.Pop quiz, hot shot: Why is “Speed” a fantastic, rip-roaring summer spectacle? Maybe it has to do with a manic Dennis Hopper playing Howard Payne, an embittered, retired police officer planting bombs around Los Angeles so he might reap a reward far higher than the flimsy gold watch he received from the department upon his retirement? Or maybe it’s the kooky, murderous glee he displays when he manipulates the young and whip-smart SWAT officer Jack Traven (Keanu Reeves) onto a bus primed to detonate if the vehicle stops, slows below 50 miles per hour, or if Jack tries to evacuate any of the hostages?In those ways, the director Jan de Bont’s “Speed” is emblematic of other big, 1990s blockbuster action-thrillers, such as the “Die Hard” series or “The Rock,” wherein major explosions and grand chases are instigated by terrorist foes. What separates the film from others of its ilk, however, is the dynamic and youthful romance shared by Reeves as Jack and Sandra Bullock as the unassuming wildcat, and the bus’s accidental driver, Annie Porter. Jack and Annie’s passion grows with every hairpin turn, bracingly stitched together by the editor John Wright, and every intimate close-up of Jack guiding Annie through Payne’s multiple bids to destroy the bus.The film’s signature scene, in which Jack and Annie escape the vehicle, wrapped in each other’s arms as they glide atop a floorboard across an airport tarmac, is the swooning stuff that action movies are made of.— Robert DanielsHorror‘The Final Terror’ (1983)Stream it on Tubi.One of my horror guilty pleasures is this summertime slasher film that was shot in the Northern California wilderness in 1981, which was almost called “The Forest PrimEvil.” The film is creepy, atmospheric and boasts a starry cast — for the ’80s, that is — that includes Daryl Hannah, Rachel Ward and Adrian Zmed.The story is pure formula: Young folks from a rural camp go to the woods to have sex, test their survival skills and share ghost stories, including one about a deranged woman who lives among the trees. The kids should have listened to their bus driver (a wild-eyed Joe Pantoliano) when he warned them not to take this trip, because a hulking sicko, camouflaged in a cloak of forest detritus, is killing their friends. The final reckoning with the maniac is so eye-poppingly directed, you’ll forgive the abrupt ending.What makes this a terrific summer scare is how the director Andrew Davis (“The Fugitive”) simultaneously finds beauty and menace in the season’s natural pleasures: rushing waters, campfire camaraderie, sunlight through towering Redwoods. Much of the action takes place in the wild, giving the thrills a sweaty, survivalist edge, but Davis still pauses to paint quiet moments with artful, spectral spookiness. I’m also a fan of the interracial cast — unusual for early ’80s horror — and the 83-minute run time. Plus, it’s free to stream.Stick to “Friday the 13th” for summer horror you know. For an unexpected alternative, this sleeper is worth your time.— Erik PiepenburgScience Fiction‘Independence Day’ (1996)Stream it on Hulu.Twenty-six years ago, Roland Emmerich delivered the epitome of the summer blockbuster: big, loud and unabashedly fun. The timing could not have been better, either: Not only did the film come out on July 3, but the action takes place over the three days of the title holiday. That time span, however, is the only thing restrained about “Independence Day,” which revels in joyous, ridiculous over-the-topness.The pitch is simple: Aliens have picked the American holiday to attack Earth, and only President Thomas J. Whitmore (Bill Pullman), the fighter pilot Steven Hiller (Will Smith) and the sexy engineer David Levinson (Jeff Goldblum) are standing in their way. “I could have been at a barbecue!” Hiller rails in a classic scene. Humanity thanks him for his service.“Independence Day” is packed with supersize shots, like Air Force One taking off in front of a firestorm and a fleet of R.V.s crossing salt flats. But the film’s effectiveness lies in its canny balance of the oversize and the minute. One second, spaceships are wiping out entire cities; the next, Smith is punching an alien in the face. And let’s not forget the memorable character actors beefing up the supporting roles, from Brent Spiner’s Area 51 scientist to Randy Quaid’s crop-dusting pilot.Despite clocking in at two and a half hours, “Independence Day” is remarkably brisk, especially compared with our modern lumbering giants. Perhaps we need to thank Emmerich, a disaster auteur with a genuine knack for entertainment, for his service as well.— Elisabeth VincentelliInternational‘La Ciénaga’ (2001)Stream it on HBO Max or the Criterion Channel.You could watch “La Ciénaga” in an air-conditioned room in the chilly depths of winter, and you’d still find yourself wiping sweat from your brow, swatting at imaginary mosquitoes and reaching for a glass of cold wine. Lucrecia Martel’s film swamps us in the sounds and sensations of a humid Argentine summer: The whir of fans, the rumble of distant thunder and the snores of sleeping, perspiring adults fill the decrepit country home where Mecha (Graciela Borges) and her cousin Tali (​​Mercedes Morán) gather their families for an escape from the city.There’s no straightforward narrative arc in “La Ciénaga”; instead, the oppressive heat is the plot, and Martel studies the instincts that it unleashes in her petty, middle-class characters. At the start of the film, a group of adults drink and lounge listlessly beside a fetid pool, and when Mecha trips and falls over a tray of glasses, bleeding profusely, the others barely even twitch. The sun and the wine have brought out the worst of their sluggishness and self-absorption, and their lethargy permeates the film like smog. Their children, meanwhile, are manic and restless, trying to combat the ennui of summer with adventures that often end in injuries.Then there is the Indigenous help, attendants who hover at the edges of the chaos, enduring crude insults and endless demands for ice and towels. Who gets vacation, and who works vacation? Who gets to be idle, and thanks to whose labor? In “La Ciénaga,” even the summer is an unequally distributed resource, its malaise laying bare deeper social ills.— Devika Girish More

  • in

    ‘They/Them’ Review: Scared Straight

    A masked ax-murderer runs amok at a gay conversion camp in this flimsy, Kevin Bacon-starring slasher flick.When Kevin Bacon first appears in John Logan’s “They/Them” as Owen Whistler, a counselor at a summer gay conversion camp, he exudes an affable, ingratiating charisma that puts the apprehensive campers cautiously at ease. Rather than coming off as a bigoted tyrant, Owen seems kind and open-minded, employing social justice terminology to promise that he doesn’t intend to force anybody to be straight, but simply wants to help them “find their truth” — a considerate attitude that even partially appeases Jordan (Theo Germaine), a nonbinary teen immediately suspicious of Whistler’s approach. Because this is a slasher movie, Whistler’s overly polite demeanor carries for the audience an edge of latent menace. This is a horror flick about L.G.B.T.Q. teens at a conversion camp, after all. There’s no way it’s going to be that easy.Whistler’s genial facade does eventually slip, and “They/Them” ramps up the familiar slasher violence, as a masked, ax-wielding maniac begins butchering various people around camp. But Logan, who also wrote the screenplay, feels so averse to engaging with the thorny political implications inherent in this material — of having to negotiate a cast of gay, transgender and nonbinary characters in a horror context — that the whole thing winds up seeming rather tame. Slasher movies demand a certain willingness to be provocative, or even tasteless: a little incendiary zeal is essential to the effect. “They/Them” wants badly to avoid offending anyone, and takes pains to avoid any action that might be considered problematic. Well, the result is probably inoffensive — a horror movie without blood pumping in its veins.They/ThemNot rated. Running time: 1 hour 30 minutes. Watch on Peacock. More

  • in

    ‘Mija’ Review: Hitting the Notes

    In this documentary, a new generation of Mexican American musicians reflect the nuances of their realities on both sides of the border.In the documentary “Mija,” the music manager Doris Muñoz wonders aloud in voice-over if her brothers resented her for being the only person in their Mexican immigrant family with U.S. citizenship. She concludes with what could’ve easily been a throwaway line: “How could they not?”But her delivery is so full of raw emotion that it breaks the film open and sets a poignant tone for this coming-of-age story from the director Isabel Castro. Poetic in its musicality yet rooted in the mundane, “Mija” sheds fresh light on the longings of a new generation of Mexican Americans making music that reflects the nuances of their realities on both sides of the border.Shot in vérité, and including the use of camcorder footage from Doris’s family, the film follows Doris as she works behind-the-scenes with her Gen Z singer-songwriters (Cuco and later, Jacks Haupt) all while helping her parents navigate the green card process. Castro favors close-up silhouettes of her subjects paired with the sparing use of Doris’s confession-like voice-over that sounds just above a whisper. And when we eventually get to hear Doris sing from her own considerable depths, we know that she too is a star.The subtitles in “Mija” are loose — some Spanish, and Spanglish, is translated, some isn’t. A subtle choice that might point to Castro, much like Doris and her artists’ songs, making a decision to forgo explanatory commas and simply let the ineffable, untranslatable parts of their story breathe.All this adds up to an immersive, deeply empathetic look at what it means for first-generation Americans like Doris and Jacks to reclaim the right to pursue unpredictable dreams. With all the familial sacrifices made to forge a life for them in America, one could argue this was the point: how could they not?MijaNot rated. Running time: 1 hour 25 minutes. In theaters. More

  • in

    ‘Prey’ Review: Alien vs. Warrior

    The “Predator” franchise gets a prequel and the Comanche Nation gets a space invader in this unremarkable adventure.After 35 years and six increasingly mediocre movies, the “Predator” franchise has long since exhausted its ideas and probably its audience. Nevertheless here comes Dan Trachtenberg’s “Prey,” a sort-of prequel and an attempted CPR of a monster who still sports the familiar dreadlocks, but whose flaring oral cavity is mostly denied the lingering, fleshy close-ups we have come to love. Maybe this time the studio suits balked at said orifice’s blatant invocation of a vagina dentata.At any rate, this Predator (played with gusto by the former professional basketball player Dane DiLiegro) remains, for a frustrating length of time, a diaphanous blur. Dropped out of a spaceship in the Northern Great Plains in 1719, the beast proceeds to research the local wildlife. Taking note of the bloody remains, Naru (Amber Midthunder), a young Comanche woman, and her brother (Dakota Beavers) determine to track the perpetrator. Fatherless and fearless, Naru wants nothing more than to become a respected warrior. Let the other women do the gathering; Naru is all about the hunting.Yet despite a female-empowerment theme and an adversary fairly bristling with fancy weaponry, “Prey” never builds a head of steam. Jeff Cutter’s gorgeously verdant landscapes glide languidly past, and Midthunder (whose fine performances have too often been buried in forgettable projects) is gutsy and game. But pitting Naru against a series of pop-up threats — an enraged bear, deadly quicksand, skeevy French fur trappers — is barely a plot. Even if you include the seven-foot space alien.Boasting a cast drawn almost entirely from Native American and First Nations actors, “Prey” is painstakingly attentive to the authenticity of its Indigenous setting. Similar attention to the script would not have gone amiss.PreyRated R for flesh-eating rats, rapacious Frenchmen and a thingy from outer space. Running time: 1 hour 39 minutes. Watch on Hulu. More

  • in

    Five Sci-Fi Classics, One Summer: How 1982 Shaped Our Present

    Five Sci-Fi Classics, One Summer: How 1982 Shaped Our Present“Blade Runner,” “E.T.,” “Tron,” “The Wrath of Khan” and “The Thing” all arrived that one season 40 years ago to become indelible and influential.The future is now: The photographer Sinna Nasseri captured images of present-day New York City as it might have been predicted by science fiction films of the 1980s. Above, a replica of the DeLorean from “Back to the Future” was on display in Times Square. Listen to This ArticleTo hear more audio stories from publications like The New York Times, download Audm for iPhone or Android.At the end of Christian Nyby’s 1951 sci-fi chiller “The Thing from Another World” — about an Arctic expedition whose members are stealthily decimated by an accidentally defrosted alien monster — a traumatized journalist takes to the airwaves to deliver an urgent warning. “Watch the skies,” he insists breathlessly, hinting at the possibility of a full-on invasion in the final lines. “Keep looking. Keep watching the skies.”This plea for eagle-eyed vigilance suited the postwar era of Pax Americana, in which economic prosperity was leveraged against a creeping paranoia — of threats coming from above or within. The final lines of movie were prescient about the rise of the American science-fiction film, out of the B-movie trenches in the 1950s and into the firmament of the industry’s A-list several decades later.The peak of this trajectory came in the summer of 1982, in which five authentic genre classics premiered within a one-month span. After its June 4, 1982, opening, “Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan,” set an unexpected record by grossing about $14 million on its first weekend. Seven days later, Steven Spielberg’s “E.T.: The Extra-Terrestrial” debuted to $11 million but proved to have stubby, little box office legs, eventually grossing more than half a billion dollars worldwide. June 25 brought the competing releases of Ridley Scott’s ambitious tech-noir thriller “Blade Runner” and John Carpenter’s R-rated remake of “The Thing,” visions several shades darker than “E.T.”; both flopped as a prelude to their future cult devotion. On July 9, Disney’s technologically groundbreaking “Tron,” set in a virtual universe of video-game software, completed the quintet.Not all of these movies were created equal artistically, but taken together, they made a compelling case for the increasing thematic flexibility of their genre. The range of tones and styles on display was remarkable, from family-friendly fantasy to gory horror. Whether giving a dated prime-time space opera new panache or recasting 1940s noir in postmodernist monochrome, the filmmakers (and special-effects technicians) of the summer of ’82 created a sublime season of sci-fi that looks, 40 years later, like the primal scene for many Hollywood blockbusters being made — or remade and remodeled — today. How could five such indelible movies arrive at the same time?Whether the summer of ’82 represented the gentrification of cinematic sci-fi or its artistic apex, the genre’s synthesis of spectacle and sociology had been underway for some time. Following the pulp fictions of the ’50s, if there was one movie that represented a great leap forward for cinematic science fiction, it was Stanley Kubrick’s epically scaled, narratively opaque 1968 film “2001: A Space Odyssey,” which not only featured a massive, mysterious monolith but also came to resemble one in the eyes of critics and audiences alike.The film’s grandeur was undeniable, and so was its gravitas: It was an epic punctuated with a question mark. Almost a decade later, “Star Wars” used a similar array of special effects to cultivate more weightless sensations. In lieu of Kubrick’s anxious allegory about humans outsmarted and destroyed by their own technology, George Lucas put escapism on the table — “a long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away” — and staged a reassuringly Manichaean battle between good and evil, with very fine aliens on both sides.The same year as “Star Wars,” Spielberg’s “Close Encounters of the Third Kind” rekindled the paranoid alien-invasion vibes of the ’50s with an optimistic twist. The film had originally been titled “Watch the Skies” in homage to Nyby’s classic, but it was an invitation to a more benevolent form of stargazing: Its climactic light show was as patriotic as Fourth of July fireworks, with a distinctly countercultural message worthy of Woodstock: Make love, not war (of the worlds).What united “Star Wars” and “Close Encounters,” beyond their makers’ shared sense of genre history (and mechanics), were their direct appeals to both children and the inner children of grown-ups everywhere. In The New Yorker, the influential and acerbic critic Pauline Kael carped that George Lucas was “in the toy business.” Like the scientist at the end of “The Thing From Another World,” she was raising the alarm about what she saw as a powerful, pernicious influence: the infantilization of the mass audience by special-effects spectacle.Yet even Kael submitted to the shamelessly populist charms of “E.T.,” which she described as being “bathed in warmth.” She wrote that the film, about the intimate friendship between a 10-year-old boy and a benign, petlike thing from another world, “reminds you of the goofiest dreams you had as a kid.”What The Times Said About These Five Movies in 1982Card 1 of 5Blade Runner. More

  • in

    ‘Memory Box’ Review: Reanimating a Painful Past

    In this ambitious, intergenerational drama, a teenager in Montreal discovers her mother’s diaries and photos from her adolescent years in a war-torn Lebanon.There’s a moment in “Memory Box” when Alex (Paloma Vauthier), a Lebanese teenager in Montreal, finds a series of old photos of her mother, Maia, walking through the streets of Beirut as a girl. Alex snaps pictures of them with her iPhone, then scrolls through them rapidly, so that the photos come to magical life, the still images becoming a movie.Such beautiful, séance-like moments abound in Joana Hadjithomas and Khalil Joreige’s drama, about the new lives that memories — even traumatic ones — can take when passed down through generations. On a snowy Christmas morning, Maia (Rim Turki) receives a box full of diaries, photos and tapes she had sent to a friend in Paris in the 1980s, documenting her adolescence in the shadow of the Lebanese Civil War.When Alex, defying her mother and grandmother’s orders, rummages through the box, she finds an entire life that Maia has never shared with her.The relationship between mother and daughter is rather thinly etched — there’s a little too much going on in this ambitious, intergenerational film — but Hadjithomas and Joreige deftly use Maia’s archive to weave together past and present. Her notebooks and cassettes are based on Hadjithomas’s real-life correspondences and Joreige’s photographs of Beirut. As Alex sifts through the items, the directors recreate the transporting workings of memory: Grainy photos turn into buoyant stop-motion animations that lead us into pop-scored flashback sequences.But when Maia excitedly develops a roll of film from 25 years ago, the pictures show up blank. Memories, whether human or technological, have their limits. But in sharing them, as “Memory Box” movingly demonstrates, we can discover them anew.Memory BoxNot rated. In English, French and Arabic, with subtitles. Running time: 1 hour 42 minutes. In theaters. More