More stories

  • in

    Werner Herzog’s ‘Theater of Thought’ Explores the Mysteries of the Brain

    In “Theater of Thought,” he talks to scientists and other experts about consciousness, quantum computing and whether parrots understand human speech.There’s a moment in “Theater of Thought” (in theaters) when Darío Gil, the director of research at IBM, is explaining quantum computing to Werner Herzog, the movie’s director. Standing before a whiteboard, Gil draws some points on spheres to illustrate how qubits work, then proceeds to define the Schrödinger equation. As he talks and writes, the audio grows quieter, and Herzog’s distinctive resonant German accent takes over. “I admit that I literally understand nothing of this, and I assume most of you don’t either,” he intones in voice-over. “But I found it fascinating that this mathematical formula explains the law that draws the subatomic world.”It’s a funny moment, a playful way to keep us from glazing over when presented with partial differential equations. Herzog may be a world-renowned filmmaker, but he’s hardly a scientist, and that makes him the perfect director for “Theater of Thought,” a documentary about, as he puts it, the “mysteries of our brain.”Emphasis on mysteries. Herzog interviews a dizzying array of scientists, researchers, and even a Nobel Prize winner or two. He asks them about everything: how the brain works, what consciousness means, what the tiniest organisms in the world are, whether parrots understand human speech, whether rogue governments can control thoughts, whether we’re living in an elaborate simulation, how telepathy and psychedelics work, and, at several points, what thinking even is. Near the end of the film he notes that not one of the scientists could explain what a thought is, or what consciousness is, but “they were all keenly alive to the ethical questions in neuroscience.” In other words, they’re immersed in both the mystery and what their field of study implies about the future of humanity.There’s a boring way to make this movie, with talking-head interviews that are arranged to form a coherent argument. Herzog goes another direction, starting off by narrating why he’s making it, then talking about his interviewees as we are introduced to them in their labs or in their favorite outdoor settings. (He also visits Philippe Petit, the Twin Towers tightrope walker, as he practices in his Catskills backyard.) Herzog’s constant verbal presence brings us into his own head space — his own brain, if you will — and gives us the sense that we’re following his patterns of thought.We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More

  • in

    ‘Kraven the Hunter’ Review: A Seriously Silly Movie

    Aaron Taylor-Johnson’s buff Marvel hero is overshadowed by unabashedly fun villains.Built on brawn, J.C. Chandor’s action sci-fi picture “Kraven the Hunter” is limited by incomprehensible plotting and dodgy one-liners delivered by a cast who seem to be practicing their worst Russian accents. If not for the bevy of anticlimactic fights, “Kraven the Hunter” could be so bad it’s good. Instead, it’s merely another excursion away from the Marvel Cinematic Universe to Sony’s series of defanged comic book villains.Kraven’s baffling origin story finds a jumbled through-line in half brothers Sergei and Dmitri’s tight-knit relationship. Sons of Russian drug dealer Nikolai Kravinoff (Russell Crowe, adopting a low, growling accent), the boys are persistently pushed by their bloodthirsty father to be stronger than Sergei’s mother, who recently died by suicide. To harden them, Nikolai takes them hunting in Ghana. “Shoot to kill. Fun,” Nikolai grumbles. Fun for Sergei is short-lived when a lion mauls him. Only a potion provided by a passerby named Calypso saves Sergei, imbuing him with otherworldly vision, agility and strength.Fast forward 16 years and a hulking Sergei (Aaron Taylor-Johnson) is now a vigilante known as “Kraven the Hunter,” who’s pursuing criminals that remind him of his estranged father. Aleksei Sytsevich (Alessandro Nivola), a Russian mercenary who can morph into a rhino, is not only worried that Kraven will soon pursue him. Aleksei also wants to eliminate his rival Nikolai. Aleksei kidnaps Dmitri and dispatches a time-morphing assassin called the Foreigner (Christopher Abbott) to pursue Kraven. With an adult Calypso (Ariana DeBose) providing aid, Kraven tries to free Dmitri.Thankfully, “Kraven the Hunter” doesn’t take itself too seriously. Like Sony’s “The Venom” franchise and “Madame Web,” the story is incidental to these larger-than-life characters. While Taylor-Johnson does his best Hugh Jackman impression — posing for glamour shots of his ripped body before crawling and flying across the frame — only a couple of actors here know exactly what movie they’re in. Abbott is captivatingly slippery, rolling his slender frame and casting his bewitching eyes on his victims with cool intent. Nivola, on the other hand, is the type of ham you’d find in Joel Schumacher’s Batman films. From his surprising hissing to his stocky build, every choice he makes is spontaneous yet wholly grounded in this troubled character.If the action in “Kraven the Hunter” was as well conceived as its villains, it’d be a riot. Unfortunately, the brawls are physically detached from the environment. The choreography lacks punch and design; the compositions are spatially unaware. Kraven and Aleksei ‘s final tussle, an anticlimactic mud fight in the middle of a field, ends as quickly as it began. The film adds a pound of revenge and an ounce of a surprise to its final moments, but these ingredients, including the entertaining silliness, aren’t enough for “Kraven the Hunter” to catch the biggest game — our admiration.Kraven the HunterRated R for violence, blood and daddy problems. Running time: 2 hours 7 minutes. In theaters. More

  • in

    ‘Carry On’ Review: Travel Nightmares Amplified

    In this tense thriller, Taron Egerton plays a T.S.A. agent who goes up against an implacable terrorist (Jason Bateman). The man has a funny idea of what he wants to bring on a plane.If you’re a fan of white-knuckle-tension suspense thrillers, you know the debate as to whether or not the 1988 classic “Die Hard” is a Christmas movie. “Carry-On,” directed by the expert technician Jaume Collet-Serra, makes absolutely no bones about being a Christmas movie as it seeks to work your nerves in the “Die Hard” tradition.The setting here is a Los Angeles airport. The T.S.A. agent Ethan Kopek, played by Taron Egerton, finds himself the unwilling pawn of a determined terrorist hellbent on getting a nasty package on an eastbound jet. Kopek has a history of not putting himself out there — for years he’s tamped down his ambitions to become a real police officer — who is now blackmailed into stepping up in all the wrong ways. The alternative is a staggering body count.While the character details are conventional and treacly — what do you know, Kopek’s beautiful wife (Sofia Carson) also happens to be pregnant with the couple’s first child! — the suspense mechanisms of T.J. Fixman’s script, which support a fat-free running time of nearly two hours, are consistently tightly wound.As Kopek’s nameless tormentor, Jason Bateman is chilling. A lot of actors who’ve spent their careers playing relatively amiable characters, as Bateman has, can barely restrain themselves from winking at least a little when they take on a bad guy role. But the actor only ever knuckles down at being loathsome.While the picture doesn’t break any new genre ground, it has several jaw-dropping set pieces, including an incredibly physical fight inside a speeding car. Collet-Serra’s staging is excellent throughout. The simulated airport setting is filled with hustle and bustle that looks just as annoying as real air travel is, especially during the holidays. Except this particular airport is way more sparkling and clean than any in real life.Carry OnRated PG-13 for violence and language. Running time: 1 hour 59 minutes. Watch on Netflix. More

  • in

    ‘September 5’ Review: When the Munich Games Changed Our News

    Tim Fehlbaum’s journalism procedural, starring Peter Sarsgaard, tracks the broadcast coverage of the terrorist attack at the 1972 Olympics.A tense ethical showdown with the racing pulse of a thriller, “September 5” revisits the day in 1972 when the Munich Olympics became a very different kind of international spectacle. Before dawn that morning, while many of the world’s elite athletes were still sleeping in the Olympic Village or drunkenly heading for bed, eight heavily armed members of Black September, a militant Palestinian group, easily scrambled over a perimeter fence in the village. They quickly made their way to the building where the Israeli delegation was housed and took 11 of its members hostage, shooting two men, who soon died.This grim flashpoint sets “September 5” in motion, but the movie isn’t about the hostages, the militants or the Middle East. It’s a journalism creation story about the men and a few women from ABC Sports who — originally in Munich to report on fencing, boxing and other athletic competitions — ended up abruptly making history themselves when they covered a major news story globally on live television. The correspondent Peter Jennings (Benjamin Walker), for one, who had established the network’s first Middle East bureau, may have thought he would be enjoying a break by covering the Olympics. He was soon huddling on a balcony, bringing a conflict from the region into homes worldwide while coolly reassuring colleagues, in a mic-drop bit of dialogue, that he’s safely out of range of an exploding grenade.Jennings and the other boldfaced-journalism names hover in and around “September 5,” which centers on a handful of behind-the-scenes ABC employees, including an earnest young producer, Geoff (John Magaro). Along with a German translator, Marianne (Leonie Benesch), and a French-Algerian engineer, Jacques (Zinedine Soualem), Geoff is among the first in the group to hear the gunfire that breaks the early quiet. He rouses Roone Arledge, who had brought the Olympics to the network and was the president of ABC Sports. Arledge went on to become the president and chairman of ABC News, superstar status that might explain the flattering decision to cast the camera-friendly Peter Sarsgaard in the role.It takes a few beats for Geoff and the rest of the crew to grasp the magnitude of what’s happening nearby, but once they do, they step on the gas and just go, go, go. Setting an accelerated pace that rarely eases, the director Tim Fehlbaum, who wrote the script with Moritz Binder (Alex David is billed as a co-writer), smartly skips over the usual people-and-places introductions and the throat-clearing rest. Instead, he stirs up a whirlwind of frenetic motion, homing in on the ABC team, and tries to figure out what they’re actually covering. The network’s main face for the games, Jim McKay — who’s seen only in smoothly incorporated archival footage — was meant to have the day off. He was soon in his studio chair earpiece in place, anchoring and delivering updates live on camera.Fehlbaum leans heavily into the logistics of getting the crisis on the air, a focus on the labor and the deadline-fueled energy, which gives the movie the quality of a journalism procedural. People race down halls, burst into rooms, fire up monitors, grab rotary phones and bark into walkie-talkies as big as cinder blocks. (The movie is an analog fetishist’s delight.) Amid the kinetic motion, staffers like Marvin (a very good Ben Chaplin) clench jaws to discuss next moves, telegraphing the tough arguments to come. Among the movie’s stealthiest surprises is that each moving part, every rushed phone call and snap decision, is part of a feature-length argument that the filmmakers are making about journalism in the age of mass spectacle.We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More

  • in

    Selena Gomez and Benny Blanco Announce Their Engagement. The Internet Rejoices.

    The couple, who have been publicly discussing their relationship for a year, were deluged with congratulations on social media.The actor and singer Selena Gomez announced her engagement to Benny Blanco, the record producer and songwriter, in a social media post Wednesday night, and Taylor Swift, one of Gomez’s closest friends, quickly offered to be her flower girl.Gomez, who received two Golden Globe nominations this week, shared a stack of pictures of the marquise-cut diamond along with the caption, “Forever begins now.” In one photo, Gomez marvels at the ring while sitting on a blanket on a lawn next to a picnic hamper, a Champagne bucket and a couple of boxes from Taco Bell.“I said yes to this,” Gomez shouted in a short video posted to her Instagram stories. “It’s so pretty.”Blanco wrote, “Hey wait… that’s my wife.”By Thursday morning, the engagement post had received more than 15 million likes and scores of comments from Gomez’s friend group.Jennifer Aniston, Lil Nas X, Nina Dobrev, Gwyneth Paltrow and Lily Collins offered their congratulations.Swift, one of Gomez’s besties, wrote, “yes I will be the flower girl.” That comment alone has received more than one million likes.Representatives for Gomez and Blanco did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Thursday.The pair’s connection dates back to at least 2015, when Blanco produced songs for Gomez’s album “Revival.” They have since worked together on other projects, including “Single Soon,” a song released by Gomez last year.Since making their relationship public in December 2023, the couple have not shied away from the cameras, and have discussed their romance in interviews.“She’s truly just like my best friend,” Blanco said on “The Howard Stern Show” in May, adding that he was already thinking about having children. “When I look at her, I do say, I don’t know a world where it can be better than this.”Gomez echoed similar sentiments in a recent interview with CBS Sunday Morning, calling Blanco her best friend.“I am beyond proud to know that there is someone in the world that deeply cares about every tiny detail about who I am,” she said. “And to have someone support me, encourage me, inspire me and motivate me. It brings me a joy.”Gomez told The Hollywood Reporter also last month that she decided to share her pictures and videos of her relationship online because “I guess this is the safest I’ve ever felt in one, and I see a future with this person.”She added: “And when you put a little bit out there, people are not as hungry to hunt you down.” More

  • in

    ‘Dirty Angels’ Review: Women on a Mission

    In this heavy-handed action movie, Eva Green plays a Marine who leads a squad trying to rescue schoolgirls in Afghanistan.The action thriller “Dirty Angels” — a fictional story about a group of soldiers who set out to rescue kidnapped schoolgirls in Afghanistan held hostage by members of the Islamic State, or ISIS — suffers from the discord between the real-life conflicts that make up its setting and the cartoonish characters who propel its plot.It opens by introducing its villain: Amir (George Iskandar), a smirking ISIS member who will soon lead the capture of the schoolgirls. He kills indiscriminately, but in case that isn’t enough to telegraph his terror, an ominous score overlays his every move. Who could stop him but our hero, Jake (Eva Green, grunting her lines)? She’s a steely Marine, who was once held captive by ISIS and joins the women-led recovery mission to avenge her former unit.The director, Martin Campbell (“Casino Royale”), uses his genre pedigree to assemble a series of bloody shootouts that build the women’s squad-goals morale while establishing their toughness. They even elect to ditch names — too girlie, surely — in favor of “functions”: Mechanic (Rona-Lee Shimon), the Bomb (Maria Bakalova), Shooter (Emily Bruni), Geek (Jojo T. Gibbs).But while the movie flouts traditional gender roles, it easily plays into stereotypes about race and religion. The saviors speak English and the terrorists speak Pashto; in one sequence, the commandos slip into enemy territory by donning niqabs as disguises. The title, presumably a gesture at the rescue team being female but ruthless, is at least accurate: For much of her time onscreen, Green is covered in grime.Dirty AngelsRated R for brutal violence. Running time: 1 hour 44 minutes. In theaters and available to rent or buy on most major platforms. More

  • in

    ‘Young Werther’ Review: Updating an 18th-Century Love Triangle

    This charming film, starring Douglas Booth and Alison Pill, bridges the gap between Goethe’s novel and the adaptation’s modern New York City setting.There is a boisterously nimble quality to the way in which Douglas Booth plays the titular character of “Young Werther.”With hair perpetually coifed, Werther has the look of an uppity trust-fund kid, but Booth plays him more like a dandy mixed with a golden retriever, transported from another era yet born yesterday.His interpretation bridges a kind of spiritual gap between the 18th-century German novel by Johann Wolfgang von Goethe that the film is based on and the modern New York City milieu that this charming adaptation takes place in. The movie, written and directed by José Avelino Gilles Corbett Lourenço, focuses on the trials of Werther, an idealistic young man caught in a love triangle. After meeting and falling in love with Charlotte (Alison Pill), a woman he spends a whirlwind night with at a party, Werther is stunned to hear that she’s already engaged. Charlotte’s fiancé, Albert (Patrick J. Adams), is stable and sweet, but he doesn’t make time for her. Werther, on the other hand, is a romantic adventure.He is all jokes and jolly energy, an irresistible foil to Charlotte’s typically constricted outlook. Booth and Pill make for a pair worth rooting for, but it’s Booth in particular, just barely but believably not of this world, who lends the film its winning sensibility.He’s helped by the film’s warmly pleasing focus, where the edges of the frame blur around the central characters, often Werther and Charlotte laughing and falling for one another. It’s as if we’re looking through a telescope, a representation of both the tunnel vision of love and also of a tragic romance of centuries past.Young WertherRated R for some language and sexual references. Running time: 1 hour 41 minutes. In theaters and available to rent or buy on most major platforms. More

  • in

    ‘The Man in the White Van’ Review: Sleazy Rider

    In this derivative thriller, set in the early 1970s, young women are stalked by an anonymous killer.“The Man in the White Van,” loosely based on the exploits of the Florida killer Billy Mansfield, Jr., is a flaccid and formulaic thriller more beholden to horror-movie conventions than those of true crime.Unfolding mainly in 1975 in an anonymous suburb, the story (by the director, Warren Skeels, and Sharon Y. Cobb) centers on Annie (Madison Wolfe), a 15-year-old tomboy unnerved by a mysterious white van that appears to be following her. Neither her religious parents (Ali Larter and Sean Astin) nor her prissy older sister (Brec Bassinger) believe her, attributing her fears to an overactive imagination.Or maybe puberty, a not-so-subtle subtext here as Annie develops a crush on the new boy in school (Noah Lomax) and learns to shave her legs. A drop of blood flowers in the bathroom sink; a slithering snake spooks Annie’s horse. In this kind of movie, few places are more hazardous than the cusp of womanhood.Brief glimpses of the killer’s previous victims — via hasty flashbacks to muffled screams and van-door slams — interrupt Annie’s travails. But while Wolfe is an engaging screen presence, the movie is too clumsy and clichéd to conjure tension. Virtually every sighting of the van is accompanied by a clashing-cymbals sound effect and camera angles that distractingly recall much better movies about malevolently motivated vehicles.All of which makes “The Man in the White Van” feel both amateurish and derivative. Keeping the violence — and the villain — mainly in the shadows, the filmmakers build to a climax that’s frustratingly dumb and drawn-out. In the press notes, we learn that the movie is part of a “social impact campaign” to raise money for missing children. Hopefully the cash it raises will be greater than its chills.The Man in the White VanRated PG-13 for a little blood and a lot of smoking. Running time: 1 hour 45 minutes. In theaters. More