Movies

Subterms

    More stories

    • 88 Shares149 Views

      in Movies

      ‘Fire Island’ Review: Oh, the Summer Nights

      by

      The quips are almost as hot as the sexual tension in Andrew Ahn and Joel Kim Booster’s loosely paced but endearing romantic comedy.The fairly banal title, which refers to the famously hedonistic New York gay haven, reflects the degree of originality deployed by Andrew Ahn’s “Fire Island.” This, after all, is a rom-com that deploys not one but three genre staples — a party game (here a session of Heads Up!), a karaoke outing (Britney, naturally) and a dance scene — and where every plot development feels preordained.Yet it’s also impossible to resist a movie that uses “Legally Blonde” as a verb and in which two men adorably bond over Alice Munro short stories. Noah (Joel Kim Booster, who also wrote the screenplay and has a Netflix special due June 21) and his similarly underfunded buddies have descended on the Pines for a last week of summer fun before their host (Margaret Cho) sells her house. Noah is busy playing wingman for his friend Howie (“SNL” cast member Bowen Yang), a hopeless romantic who fears he will never find a boyfriend, while himself steering clear of emotional attachments — until he develops a suspiciously intense antipathy for the uptight, taciturn lawyer Will (the fetching Conrad Ricamora, from “How to Get Away With Murder”).The movie lightly recasts Jane Austen tropes, with Noah as the reluctant anchor of friends fumbling to form attachments beyond their own cozy circle, while the social commentary is updated to barbs at Fire Island’s racial, financial and sexual stratification. The pace is slacker than it should be, but still, “Fire Island” fits neatly alongside Kristen Stewart’s lesbian Christmas movie “Happiest Season” on Hulu’s rom-com shelf.Fire IslandRated R for sexual shenanigans. Running time: 1 hour 45 minutes. Watch on Hulu. More

    • 63 Shares149 Views

      in Movies

      ‘Miracle’ Review: A Spiritual Investigation

      by

      In this drama set in Romania, when an incident occurs with a novice from a rural convent, a detective seeks answers.The new movie “Miracle,” set in Romania, is technically a sequel, part of a planned trilogy from the writer-director Bogdan George Apetri. The first feature, “Unidentified,” also a police story, was shot simultaneously and still hasn’t opened in the United States. In a device that owes something to serialized literature and TV, and to filmmakers like Krzysztof Kieslowski, the principal characters of “Unidentified” turn up in walk-ons in “Miracle” and vice versa, and certain motifs (a ticking clock) recur.The first 45 minutes or so of “Miracle” follow Cristina Tofan (Ioana Bugarin), a novice from a rural convent, who in one of many smoothly executed long takes furtively exits the convent and hops into a cab. The driver, Albu (Valeriu Andriuta), is the brother of a nun who has arranged Cristina’s transportation to a hospital. But the return trip goes violently wrong, in another sequence that the filmmaker captures in an uninterrupted take, with particularly horrifying attention to sound.Like “Unidentified,” which broadly concerns a reprobate detective’s efforts to frame a Roma security guard, “Miracle” sometimes suggests a low-boil version of Abel Ferrara’s “Bad Lieutenant.” In its second hour, an ethically flexible inspector, Marius Preda (Emanuel Parvu), investigates the incident that caps the first part and grows steadily more enraged at his impotence in securing justice.The film continually invokes tensions between secular and religious elements in Romania, and the concept of miracles turns up in a few contexts. Framed by scenes of weeping, the narrative does not entirely pull itself into a satisfying arc, but the film nevertheless unfolds with dexterity and suspense.MiracleNot rated. In Romanian, with subtitles. Running time: 1 hour 58 minutes. In theaters. More

    • 125 Shares139 Views

      in Movies

      ‘Maika: The Girl From Another Galaxy’ Review: Boy Meets Alien

      by

      This children’s adventure movie from Vietnam is like “E.T.”—but sloppier and more eccentric.“Maika: The Girl from Another Galaxy,” by the Vietnamese director Ham Tran, is a children’s adventure movie about a lonely boy, Hung (Phu Truong Lai), who meets a chirpy alien (Diep Anh Chu) and promptly gets into trouble. It’s essentially “E.T.” with a sloppier, zanier touch, and it’s set in urban Vietnam as opposed to a sleepy California neighborhood.It hasn’t really got much for the adults to chew on, either. “Maika” is an aggressively kids-only affair — the farting and scream-acting make sure of this.The story goes as you’d expect: there’s a weepy prologue involving a tragically deceased parent; a best friend whisked away to another town by her parents; a fateful extraterrestrial encounter that quickly develops into a touching friendship; twitchy cronies on a mission to abduct the creature, Maika — who is no bug-eyed puppet, but (thanks to a bit of space magic) a regular-looking little girl.With its fluorescent purple computer-generated flourishes, the movie looks dated even if a number of scenes involve pointedly modern phenomenon, like a zippy drone chase and a group of kids playing with VR headsets.The coastal Vietnamese setting provides a welcome variation on the boy-meets-alien formula, as does the cultural milieu, with wealthy types living in glossy high-rises and humbler families right below them struggling to keep up with society’s technological developments. (Hung’s father owns a repair shop, but he hasn’t yet pivoted to the more lucrative business of repairing tablets and phones.)But mostly, “Maika” stands out for its moments of weird eccentricity. Bad guys get slapped by gobs of kimchi and Hung and Maika float around in a bubble, zooming past airplanes. Sure, it’s all very loud and cartoonish, but at least we’re not stuck in the suburbs.Maika: The Girl From Another GalaxyNot rated. In Vietnamese, with subtitles. Running time: 1 hour 45 minutes. In theaters. More

    • 75 Shares189 Views

      in Movies

      ‘Eiffel’ Review: Paris is for Lovers

      by

      Gustave Eiffel, the man behind France’s most well-known landmark, is a passionate lover first, and an engineer second in this tedious 19th century romance.“Eiffel” is as much of a history lesson as “Titanic” is — in other words, it’s basically not one. It’s more like historical fiction, with the real-life 19th century figure Gustave Eiffel, the man responsible for masterminding France’s most iconic landmark, portrayed as a passionate lover first, and an engineer second.Played by Romain Duris, Gustave contends with naysayers, striking workers and financial setbacks as he commandeers the grand effort to construct the Eiffel Tower. The director Martin Bourboulon intermittently takes us to the construction site, where men toil away, the metal monolith gets progressively taller and Gustave pores over architectural blueprints with a furrowed brow.But the main intrigue involves his romance with Adrienne (Emma Mackey), a married woman with whom he shares an emotional past. Flashbacks from both Gustave and Adrienne’s perspectives show the star-crossed lovers 20 years back, indulging their carnal desires against fireplace backdrops and Parisian sunsets before Adrienne’s disapproving parents step in. Her unexpected return as Gustave deals with various obstacles to the tower’s completion fuels his creativity and commitment.The film’s shrugging disregard for historical context would be negligible were the romance not so tedious and clichéd. The tower was originally perceived as a foolhardy venture, which provoked national debates and class tensions. But these forces are only vaguely touched upon — too bad considering that tale’s dramatic potential relative to the humdrum love story whipped up here instead. And one can’t help but wonder if “Eiffel” is merely a lame fantasy or a particularly spineless form of mythmaking, whittling down as it does one nation’s politically loaded event to the equivalent of an Eiffel Tower key chain with an inscription reading “city of love.”EiffelRated R for sex scenes, brief nudity and a suicide attempt. Running time: 1 hour 48 minutes. In theaters. More

    • 138 Shares179 Views

      in Movies

      Johnny Depp Jury Finds That Amber Heard Defamed Him in Op-Ed

      by

      The jury in Virginia found that Ms. Heard had damaged her ex-husband’s reputation with an op-ed in which she identified herself as a “public figure representing domestic abuse.”For six weeks, the defamation case that the actor Johnny Depp filed against his ex-wife Amber Heard transfixed the nation, offering a rare instance of high-profile #MeToo charges and countercharges, including lurid accusations of physical abuse, being hashed out in the public spotlight of a courtroom.On Wednesday, the seven-person jury in Fairfax, Va., found that Mr. Depp had been defamed by Ms. Heard when she described herself in a 2018 op-ed in The Washington Post as a “public figure representing domestic abuse.” Mr. Depp was awarded more than $10 million in damages.During the trial Mr. Depp had fiercely denied Ms. Heard’s accusations that he had subjected her to repeated physical abuse that included punching and head-butting and several instances of sexual assault. In a statement after the verdict Mr. Depp thanked the jury, saying that it “gave me my life back.”Ms. Heard, who was in the courtroom as the verdict was read, said in a statement afterward that she was disappointed “beyond words” by their finding.“I’m heartbroken that the mountain of evidence still was not enough to stand up to the disproportionate power, influence, and sway of my ex-husband,” she said.Ms. Heard did not seem buoyed by the fact that the jury also awarded her $2 million in damages, agreeing that she had been defamed in one instance by a lawyer for Mr. Depp. A spokeswoman for Ms. Heard, Alafair Hall, said she planned to appeal.A jury found that Johnny Depp and his ex-wife Amber Heard were both defamed.Craig Hudson/Associated PressSuch cases are often settled out of court, in part to avoid public scrutiny. The bitter charges and embarrassing details in this case were aired not only in open court, but also before cameras that beamed every accusation onto televisions and livestreams, where they were turned into memes and debated on social media.The 2018 op-ed that Ms. Heard wrote never mentioned Mr. Depp by name, but he argued that it clearly referred to their marriage, which began in 2015 and fell apart just over a year later, and that it was false. (Early drafts of it were prepared by the American Civil Liberties Union, where Ms. Heard was an ambassador with a focus on women’s rights and gender-based violence.)The jury agreed, and found that it contained several statements that were false, and were made with actual malice.Ms. Heard countersued, claiming that she had been defamed in 2020 when one of Mr. Depp’s lawyers at the time had dismissed her accusations as a “hoax” in statements to a British tabloid. The jury found that Mr. Depp had defamed Ms. Heard in one instance, when the lawyer accused her of damaging the couple’s penthouse and blaming it on Mr. Depp.The verdict came as a surprise to several legal observers, who noted that a judge in Britain had ruled two years ago that there was evidence that Mr. Depp had repeatedly assaulted Ms. Heard. That ruling came in a libel suit that Mr. Depp had filed after The Sun, a British tabloid newspaper, called him a “wife beater” in a headline. The judge in that case had ruled that the defendants had shown that what they published was “substantially true.”Ms. Heard, 36, maintained throughout the trial that everything written in the op-ed was true.Amber Heard leaves the courthouse in Virginia after the jury’s verdict in the libel case brought by her ex-husband.Tom Brenner/ReutersThe combination of star power, sensational details and cameras in the courtroom turned the trial into an internet obsession. Memes and posts attacking Ms. Heard, some created by superfans of Mr. Depp, proliferated online. Ms. Heard testified that she had received thousands of death threats since the start of the trial and called the online mockery “agonizing.”Sometimes breaking into sobs on the stand, Ms. Heard testified about more than a dozen times that, she said, Mr. Depp was violent toward her. In a key incident in Australia in 2015, Ms. Heard said, Mr. Depp became “belligerent” after taking the drug MDMA and attacked her, grabbing her by the neck and, at one point, sexually assaulting her with an object that Ms. Heard later determined to be a bottle.“I’m looking in his eyes and I don’t see him anymore,” Ms. Heard testified. “I’ve never been so scared in my life.”Mackenna White, a lawyer who counsels people as to the risks of publishing potentially contested accusations of sexual misconduct, said she worried that the online mockery of Ms. Heard would make some less likely to come forward.“The absolute destruction of Amber Heard is going to have an impact,” Ms. White said. “If you’re someone who’s worried about what could happen if you speak out, this could have the same chilling effect that we’ve been trying to reverse all these years.”Others saw the online reaction as a harbinger of what the jury would decide.“You have now millions of Americans weighing in as evidence unfolds in court — you can take that as an indication of how the case is going,” said Imran Ansari, a lawyer representing Alan Dershowitz in defamation suits involving Virginia Giuffre, who said she was a victim of Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking operation and accused Mr. Dershowitz of being part of it, which he denies.Spectators outside the Virginia courthouse, many of them fans of Mr. Depp, reacted after the verdict was announced.Nicholas Kamm/Agence France-Presse — Getty ImagesMr. Depp, 58, gave a vastly different account of their relationship — and of the trip to Australia — in which Ms. Heard was the aggressor. Ms. Heard, he testified, had once been a girlfriend who seemed “too good to be true,” but turned into a partner who would taunt him, call him demeaning names, punch him and throw objects at him.In Australia, he testified, she threw a handle of vodka that exploded on his hand and severed his finger. (She denies throwing the bottle at him and said she only ever hit him in self-defense or in defense of her sister.)Johnny Depp’s Libel Case Against Amber HeardCard 1 of 7In the courtroom. More

    • 138 Shares99 Views

      in Movies

      ‘My Dead Dad’ Review: Learning the Ropes, Thanks to an Inheritance

      by

      A young man heads to Los Angeles and sees his estranged father’s life through the eyes of his tenants.“My Dead Dad” is something of a calling-card picture for its male lead, Pedro Correa, who also co-wrote and co-produced the movie. While the actor has a lengthy filmography, it’s mostly in shorts, including a parody trailer of a nonexistent sequel to “Drive,” directed by Fabio Frey, who also handles that job here.The premise for this feature is not so antic. Correa plays Lucas, a skateboarding burnout who’s been living in Reno, Nev., since his mom took him out of Los Angeles — and far from his dad — before his teenage years. Now in something like his early twenties, he learns from his mom that Augusto, said dad, has died. Taking a long drag from a cigarette, Lucas asks how his old man died. Mom answers, “Lung cancer”; Lucas mulls this over a second and says, “Nice.”That’s as close to an honest laugh as the movie earns, but it’s not about laughs, it’s about learning, sort of. Lucas has inherited the Los Angeles apartment building that Augusto owned, and he drives out to size it up and maybe sell it off. There he meets an overenthusiastic uncle (Steven Bauer), a sage building superintendent (Raymond Cruz), a beguiling and artistically inclined young woman (Courtney Dietz) and other underdeveloped characters, none of whom serve much of a function beyond placing themselves before Correa and spouting banalities while he makes doleful eyes at them.The gear-grinding tedium of the movie’s taking-responsibility scenario is occasionally broken up by not-quite-lyrical sequences of Los Angeles sunsets seen from car windows. “Being an adult sucks,” the building superintendent observes at one point. “My Dead Dad” doesn’t present any compelling counterarguments to that.My Dead DadNot rated. Running time: 1 hour 33 minutes. Watch on HBO Max. More

    • 175 Shares199 Views

      in Movies

      The verdict in the Johnny Depp-Amber Heard trial is in. Here’s what to know.

      by

      The jury deciding the outcome of the defamation trial between Johnny Depp and Amber Heard has reached a verdict, but when the court convened Wednesday afternoon, the judge returned the verdict forms to the jury to fill in the amount of damages they thought were warranted.Judge Penney S. Azcarate’s instruction seemed to indicate that the jury had found that someone had been defamed, but it was not clear whether it was Mr. Depp or Ms. Heard. The jury returned to the deliberation room.“It has to be at least a dollar for compensatory damages and up to whatever you feel the damages should be,” Judge Azcarate said.The six-week trial in Fairfax County Circuit Court turned into a contentious battle between the two Hollywood stars over the truth of what happened in their relationship and marriage, which fell apart in 2016. Both Ms. Heard and Mr. Depp accused each other of repeated physical abuse throughout their relationship.Mr. Depp, 58, sued Ms. Heard, 36, for her 2018 op-ed for The Washington Post in which she described herself as a “public figure representing domestic abuse.” After more than a year of legal sparring, Ms. Heard then filed a countersuit against Mr. Depp in 2020, alleging that he defamed her when a lawyer representing him released statements calling her allegations of abuse a hoax.Mr. Depp claimed that Ms. Heard’s op-ed “devastated” his career and reputation. Ms. Heard claimed that the statements by the lawyer harmed her ability to work and caused her emotional distress and humiliation.The seven-person jury, which started deliberating on Friday but took a break over the long holiday weekend, has been tasked with determining whether Ms. Heard defamed Mr. Depp and whether he defamed her. To deliver a victory to either of them, the jury must find that a greater weight of the evidence shows they were defamed, and that there was “clear and convincing evidence” that it was done with “actual malice.” More

    • 125 Shares99 Views

      in Movies

      Stream These 11 Titles Before They Leave Netflix This Month

      by

      A lot of great movies and TV shows are expiring for subscribers in the United States in June. Here are the ones worth finding time for.Big, beloved Oscar winners from the 1960s through the 2010s populate the slate of titles leaving Netflix in the United States at the end of the month, as well as a family favorite, a sci-fi smash and two coming-of-age classics (one for boys, one for girls). But the must-see for movie buffs is a hysterically funny puncturing of documentary conventions, so we’ll start there. (Dates reflect the final day a title is available.)‘Documentary Now!’: Seasons 1-3 (June 2)When the “Saturday Night Live” writer-stars Fred Armisen, Bill Hader and Seth Meyers created this series with their frequent “S.N.L.” director Rhys Thomas, it seemed safe to bet they would attempt to extend that show’s brand of wild satire. In fact, they created something far more niche (and funnier, perhaps because of it): a charmingly niche spoof of documentary styles and specific nonfiction movies, in the kind of hyper-specific detail that only film nerds can fully appreciate. It’s funny and surprisingly heartfelt as its creators both skewer and shine up their subjects. Standout episode: “Original Cast Album: Co-Op,” from Season 3, a parody of D.A. Pennebaker’s “Original Cast Album: Company” that was so on target it was included in the bonus features of the original film’s recent Criterion Collection release.Stream it here.‘Lady Bird’ (June 2)The actor-turned-filmmaker Greta Gerwig made her solo feature directorial debut with this poignant and funny 2017 coming-of-age movie, which was nominated for five Academy Awards. Two of those were for its stars: Saoirse Ronan is the title character, a Sacramento teenager desperate to find a way out of her suburban surroundings. Laurie Metcalf co-stars as her perpetually put-upon mother, trying her very best to ease her daughter’s bumpy transition into adulthood. Gerwig’s perceptive screenplay digs into the stickiness of this complex dynamic, and her energetic direction honors the characters’ emotional woes without getting bogged down in them.Stream it here.‘Silver Linings Playbook’ (June 17)Jennifer Lawrence won the Academy Award for best actress for this tricky exploration of love, loss and ballroom dancing from the writer-director David O. Russell. Adapting the novel by Matthew Quick, Russell tells the story of Pat (Bradley Cooper), recently released from a mental institution and trying to recalibrate his life after divorce from a tricky vantage point: his old room in the attic of his childhood home. His parents (Robert De Niro and Jacki Weaver) prove not quite the steadying influences one might hope; for that, he finds himself drawn to Tiffany (Lawrence), a young widow who implores him to join her in a dance competition. Their rehearsals form the heart of the movie, and in those scenes, the careful blend of pathos, tough talk and self-delusion casts a delicate spell.Stream it here.‘Desperado’ (June 30)The director Robert Rodriguez is best known these days for family entertainment like the “Spy Kids” franchise and sci-fi efforts like “Alita: Battle Angel.” But he broke through as a master of hyperkinetic action, first on the self-financed indie “El Mariachi,” and then with this follow-up, which injected that film’s Spaghetti Western style and filmmaking bravado with studio resources and the stars Antonio Banderas and Salma Hayek. Banderas is an enigmatic musician, strolling from one border town to the next with a guitar case full of guns, looking for the man who killed the woman he loved; Hayek is a bookstore owner who bandages his wounds and steals his heart. Their chemistry is off the charts, the action beats are rip-roaring and the cameos are delightful.Stream it here.‘The Exorcist’ (June 30)Very few films can be said to have “changed everything,” but William Friedkin’s 1973 adaptation of the novel by William Peter Blatty is certainly one of them — a box office smash, a critical success and a certified cultural phenomenon. A haunted Ellen Burstyn stars as a Georgetown actress whose daughter (a powerful Linda Blair) seems controlled by evil forces. Once a sensitive priest (Jason Miller) determines she has been possessed by the devil, a specialist (Max von Sydow) is brought in to rescue her soul. So many of the film’s big moments — the green vomit, the devil voice, the incantations of the exorcism — have been recycled and satirized that you’d think the film would lose its bite, but “The Exorcist” has lost none of its ability to scare and shock.Stream it here.‘Forgetting Sarah Marshall’ (June 30)The actor turned screenwriter Jason Segel and his “Muppets” and “Five Year Engagement” collaborator Nicholas Stoller first teamed up for this 2008 romantic comedy from the producer Judd Apatow. Segal is Peter, a sad-sack composer in a perpetual funk after his breakup with the title character (Kristen Bell), a famous TV actress. In an attempt to escape his depression, he takes a Hawaiian vacation — only to find Sarah at the same resort with her new beau (Russell Brand), a pretentious British pop star. Mila Kunis co-stars as the resort receptionist who presents a new opportunity for love; Bill Hader, Jonah Hill, Paul Rudd, and Jack McBrayer turn up in small but uproarious supporting roles.Stream it here.‘Her’ (June 30)The idea of falling in love with a virtual assistant might have seemed like pure science fiction when this comedy-drama from the writer and director Spike Jonze hit theaters in 2013; today, the growing ubiquity and sophistication of Siri and Alexa are perhaps making it inevitable. The assistant here is named Samantha and voiced by Scarlett Johansson; her “user” is Theodore (Joaquin Phoenix), who is particularly wounded because of a pending divorce. Jonze’s touching script bypasses the easy, cheap jokes for a penetrating exploration of loneliness and companionship, and Phoenix’s performance is an astonishing symphony of vulnerability and pain.Stream it here.‘How to Train Your Dragon’ (June 30)This 2010 adaptation of the book by Cressida Cowell was one of the family franchise success stories of the decade, spawning two sequels, a TV series, video games and even a live “arena spectacular.” But it is, at its heart, a simple story — something like the “boy and his dog” stories of old, in which the meek young Hiccup (voiced by Jay Baruchel), intimidated by his dragon-slaying dad (Gerald Butler) teaches himself how to tame the beasts instead. Kids will appreciate the gorgeous animation and the “be yourself” messaging; grown-ups will enjoy the comic supporting cast, which includes Jonah Hill, Christopher Mintz-Plasse and Kristen Wiig.Stream it here.‘Looper’ (June 30)When the family of Bruce Willis announced his retirement from acting in March, fans took to social media to share their favorite Willis performances: the gun-toting snark of “Die Hard” was oft-invoked, as was the sensitivity of “The Sixth Sense.” But this 2012 hit from Rian Johnson was one of the few films to successfully meld those personas, allowing Willis to emote and kick butt in equal measures. As Joe, a one-time hit man who (through a complicated combination of double-crosses and time travel) must face his 20-years-younger self (Joseph Gordon-Levitt), in a world where there’s only room for one of them. The sci-fi and action are tiptop, but “Looper” excels most in its quiet moments, which allow Willis to do some of his most finely-tuned acting since his ’90s heyday.Stream it here.‘My Fair Lady’ (June 30)George Cukor’s 1964 adaptation of the Broadway hit by Alan Jay Lerner (itself a reconfiguration of George Bernard Shaw’s “Pygmalion”) remains one of the most widely beloved movies of its era, though it’s not an obvious slam-dunk — after all, it’s a nearly-three-hour musical starring two people who can’t sing. (Audrey Hepburn’s vocals were dubbed; Rex Harrison does a kind of rhythmic lyric-reading.) But the story is timeless, the songs are memorable, and the production is handsomely mounted. It won an astonishing eight Oscars (including best picture, best actor and best director), and that sounds just about right.Stream it here.‘Stand by Me’ (June 30)Rob Reiner’s early directorial career is a mind-boggling display of adept genre-surfing, moving with ease from broad comedy (“This Is Spinal Tap”) to road movie (“The Sure Thing”) to fantasy (“The Princess Bride”) to rom-com (“When Harry Met Sally”) to suspense (“Misery”) to courtroom drama (“A Few Good Men”). In the middle of that astonishing run, he took a shot at coming-of-age dramas and proved he could do that too. This modest but memorable adaptation of the Stephen King novella “The Body” digs into its time and place (a small town in Oregon, circa 1959), shows a remarkable ear for the way boys communicate and boasts top-notch leading performances by Corey Feldman, Jerry O’Connell, Wil Wheaton and River Phoenix.Stream it here.ALSO LEAVING: “Girlfriends’ Guide to Divorce”: Seasons 1-5 (June 13), “Criminal Minds”: Seasons 1-12 (June 29), “Corpse Bride,” “Eagle Eye,”“Happy Gilmore,” “Into the Wild” and “Midnight in Paris” (all June 30). More