More stories

  • in

    ‘7 Days’ Review: Mothers’ Matchmaking Goes Awry

    Two Indian American youngsters are set up on a date that takes an unexpected turn in this pandemic-themed comedy.There’s an endearing perversity to “7 Days,” Roshan Sethi’s bad-date-gone-wrong caper that updates rom-com clichés with cultural and topical details. For one, the date between the Indian American youngsters Rita (Geraldine Viswanathan) and Ravi (Karan Soni) is arranged by their mothers via a matrimonial website. “Her hobbies include caring for her future in-laws,” Rita’s profile reads in the film’s opening. If you think catfishing is bad, meet mom-fishing: The fibs are laced with parental disappointment.Then there’s the timing. It’s March 2020, at the cusp of the coronavirus pandemic. Ravi — who turns out to be just as nerdy, neurotic and rigidly traditional as his profile promised — arrives with masks and surgical gloves and cans of Hard Lemonade that he pours out in horror when he realizes they’re alcoholic. Rita’s homely good-girl avatar, on the other hand, belies a ring of falseness. Sure enough, when their phones explode with news of shutdowns, and they head back to Rita’s, Ravi receives a righteous shock: Beer bottles and chicken wings are strewn over a never-used kitchen stove, and when Rita takes a call from “Daddy” … it’s not what Ravi expected.The masks are off (so to speak), and the two are stuck together for a week until Ravi can get a car home. The bickering and bonding that ensue are predictable, but for the most part, “7 Days” resists easy rom-com wins. The eventual Bollywood-style happy ending notwithstanding, Ravi and Rita’s incompatibility is too real — and Soni and Viswanathan’s comic timing too sharp — to permit a mawkish tale of opposites who attract. Instead, “7 Days” takes a warm, witty look at the kinds of companionship that can emerge even — or especially — in the most unromantic, pragmatic of circumstances.7 DaysNot rated. Running time: 1 hour 26 minutes. In theaters. More

  • in

    ‘Outside Noise’ Review: Walking and Talking in Vienna and Berlin

    Three women laze around German-speaking cities in the languid third feature from the indie director Ted Fendt.“Outside Noise,” a sleepy excursion around Vienna and Berlin, is the third feature from the indie director Ted Fendt (“Classical Period”), and his first to take place mostly in Europe. Its focal characters are young women listlessly pursuing various, indeterminate creative callings. Fendt is more interested in tracing the architecture of their ennui than considering its cause or consequences, and the movie observes their leisure with a warm gaze.We spend most of our time with Daniela (Daniela Zahlner), a literary type partial to flowing linen clothing and messy buns. Natural light filters into her petite Vienna flat, where she suffers insomnia by night and aimlessness by day. The movie begins with Daniela as a New York City tourist. Upon her return to Europe, she stays with her friend Mia (Mia Sellmann) in Berlin, where Daniela reads perched on a windowsill, strolls the city and meets Mia’s graduate-school classmate, Natascha (Natascha Manthe), who asks Daniela, perhaps inappropriately, to lend her some money.This may sound like the beginnings of a plot, but “Outside Noise” hardly revisits the episode. While Fendt previously powered films with awkward humor, here the mood is ruminative. (Alongside Fendt, Zahlner, Sellmann and Manthe are credited as writers.) Fendt shoots on lovely 16-millimeter and 35-millimeter film, and the movie’s texture, along with the women’s musings, at times recall several female-led features from the late 1970s and early ’80s: “Girlfriends,” “Smithereens” and “Variety.” Although less vibrant than those predecessors, Fendt’s film is equally committed to capturing the aura of an independent city dweller finding her way.Outside NoiseNot rated. In English and German, with subtitles. Running time: 1 hour 1 minute. In theaters. More

  • in

    ‘Superior’ Review: Double Fantasy

    Two identical sisters reunite under mysterious circumstances in a compelling debut feature from Erin Vassilopoulos.Believe it or not, Alessandra Mesa and Ani Mesa may be one of the only identical-twin sister pairs to lead a theatrical feature since the Wilde twins, who romanced Andy Hardy in “Andy Hardy’s Blonde Trouble” in 1944. (Yes, Mary-Kate and Ashley Olsen are — gasp — fraternal twins.) “Superior,” a compelling debut feature from Erin Vassilopoulos, casts the Mesas as Marian and Vivian, estranged siblings who reunite when Marian, a cagey chain-smoker, abruptly returns to their hometown claiming she’s just flown in from headlining a rock concert in Paris. “Kind of suspicious,” notes Vivian’s husband, Michael (Jake Hoffman), who grouses that Marian finished off his carton of milk.Outside of their matching faces, the sisters look like opposites. Hewing to the thriller’s manicured visual and sonic palette — it’s so tidy, the room tone sounds threatening — Marian slinks around in leather miniskirts while Vivian grocery shops in a beige trench coat. Yet the script, written by Vassilopoulos (the director) and Alessandra Mesa (the younger of the twin actresses by 14 minutes), reveals that the twins share one thing besides DNA: a terrible taste in men, whether a drag of a spouse who seeks a stay-at-home brood mare or a reptilian abuser (Pico Alexander) who prefers his women drugged and bound.The Mesas prove to be nimble, engaging performers. But for a long stretch, it’s unclear whether the menace of the movie that they are in is building toward anything. (There’s a limit to how often an audience is willing to fall for a hallucination.) When Vassilopoulos finally puts her characters in a squeeze, the tension remains oddly vaporous, as though she has tried to trap a thundercloud in a vice. The violence is presented with a deliberate languor that makes it feel insubstantial. Instead, it is the film’s shaggier pleasures that leave an impression, particularly its soundtrack of ’80s electro disco and a physically shaggy ice-cream parlor manager (played by Stanley Simons) who is too stoned to notice that his new employee is two different people.SuperiorNot rated. Running time: 1 hour 39 minutes. In theaters. More

  • in

    ‘You Are Not My Mother’ Review: Parental Misguidance

    A lonely teenager is traumatized by her mother’s volatile behavior in this impressive horror debut.A baby in a stroller sits alone on a deserted nighttime street. A young mother sprawls on a bed, limbs bound and head shrouded. A teenage girl cowers before classmates who are threatening to set her on fire.These are only a few of the chilling images in Kate Dolan’s arresting debut feature, “You Are Not My Mother,” a skin-crawling merger of Irish folklore and family secrets. At once deeply metaphorical and genuinely distressing, the film hovers anxiously around Char (Hazel Doupe), a withdrawn and bullied teenager who’s becoming increasingly alarmed by the erratic behavior of her mother, Angela (Carolyn Bracken). When Angela disappears, only to reappear the following day without explanation, the mystery of her whereabouts is only deepened by the unfazed reaction of Char’s grandmother (Ingrid Craigie). In this household, the silences scream.Set just outside Dublin during the run-up to Halloween, “You Are Not My Mother” leaves much of its supernatural thrust to vagueness and allusion, focusing instead on Char’s responses to her mother’s terrifying transformation. Pale-faced and wide-eyed, Doupe is heartbreaking; but it’s Bracken who has the more challenging role, flitting from hostile to loving, severe to vulnerable, energized to near-catatonic. In one startling scene, performed to Joe Dolan’s toe-tapper “You’re Such a Good Looking Woman,” she slowly turns a simple dance into a petrifying act of predation.Imaginative and spooky, “You Are Not My Mother” shows just how frightening — and stigmatizing — a parent’s mental illness can be to a child. Trapped in her suffocating suburb, where steel-colored skies press down on crouching rooftops (the wonderfully moody cinematography is by Narayan Van Maele), Char is alone. If she should find a champion, it won’t be from inside her house.You Are Not My MotherNot rated. Running time: 1 hour 33 minutes. In theaters and available to rent or buy on Amazon, Google Play and other streaming platforms and pay TV operators. More

  • in

    ‘King Otto’ Review: For Greece, a Whole Different Ballgame.

    Christopher André Marks analyzes the Greek national soccer team’s championship season under the leadership of a German coach.“King Otto,” which opens with a quote from “The Odyssey,” treats its retelling of a soccer underdog story as the stuff of myth. In 2004, the German coach Otto Rehhagel led the Greek national team to victory in the European Championship. The team had never even won a match at a major competition before. According to the closing titles, Rehhagel became the first foreign-born coach to win a major international soccer tournament for another country’s national team.In this documentary directed by Christopher André Marks, the coach, the players and others recount Rehhagel’s arrival in Greece as someone who didn’t understand the culture or speak the language. (In its opening minutes, “King Otto” makes clear that the offscreen filmmaker and Rehhagel also had a linguistic barrier to overcome.) Ioannis Topalidis, who became Rehhagel’s assistant coach and the interpreter connecting him with the players, emerges as one of the liveliest subjects.Somewhat gratingly, “King Otto” treats its story as a tale of national stereotypes colliding head-to-head. Vassilis Gagatsis, the president of the Hellenic Football Federation at the time, says he hired Rehhagel because he thought that “being a German, he would be able to instill the discipline that we Greeks lack.” One player says that the team “became calmer and cold-blooded” under Rehhagel. According to Gagatsis, the German coach turned out to have “the heart of a Greek.”“King Otto” is less grandiose and more granular when it goes match by match through the 2004 tournament. The briskly edited recap probably holds more suspense for those who didn’t follow the events than those who did.King OttoNot rated. In Greek and German, with subtitles. Running time: 1 hour 22 minutes. In theaters and available to rent or buy on Apple TV, Google Play and other streaming platforms and pay TV operators. More

  • in

    ‘Bronco Bullfrog’: Hello Young Lovers

    Barney Platts-Mills’s 1969 feature about aimless East End teenagers in love comes to Film Forum after a cinematic rediscovery.An auspicious first feature, Barney Platts-Mills’s “Bronco Bullfrog” fell between the cracks — a belated example of British “kitchen sink” naturalism that arrived in 1969 before the wave of disaffected youth films by Mike Leigh and Alan Parker.Still, the writer-director Platts-Mills lived to see his movie restored and revived, if not to enjoy its American rediscovery, heralded by a weeklong run at Film Forum in New York.Platts-Mills intended “Bronco Bullfrog” as a British equivalent of Italian neo-realism: A cast of nonactors recruited from the streets of London’s depressed East End enact a story that might have been their own. Indeed, the movie grew out of a short documentary, “Everybody’s an Actor, Shakespeare Said,” that Platts-Mills made about an improvisatory workshop established by the radical theater artist Joan Littlewood in the neighborhood.The camera tilts down from smoky factories to a world of grimy alleys, dreary housing projects and aimless teenagers, who are introduced smashing into a cheap cafe to find nothing more than a few pence and some stale cakes — the first of many disappointments. A similarly barren establishment is where diffident Del (Del Walker), 17, an apprentice welder with a bad Beatles haircut, first courts discomfited Irene (Anne Gooding), a gawky 15-year-old schoolgirl in a micro mini.The couple’s awkwardness is compelling. According to Platts-Mills — who at 25 wasn’t much older than his actors — the movie was largely improvised because the cast hadn’t bothered to read the script. Del and Irene are frequently at a loss for words but, in the Littlewood tradition, Platts-Mills gives their relationship a Shakespearean framework. Irene’s mother loathes Del as instinctively as Del’s father hates Irene. What brings the couple closer is precisely their inability to find a place to be together.The fantasy of escape is underlined by the movie’s title. Bronco Bullfrog (Sam Shepherd) is the neighborhood hero — newly escaped from reform school to embark on a dead-end career of petty larceny. Del and Irene suggest lumpen mods; Bronco is a suedehead with wide suspenders and polished work boots. He has style but no sense, happily hiding out amid cartons of stolen consumer goods he is unable to fence.Movies are part of the daydream. In a rare liberating moment, Del pays for a movie ticket then opens a theater’s side door for a small crowd of crashers that includes a jolly grandmother. A corresponding scene has Del and Irene venture into London’s West End to discover they don’t have enough money to see “Oliver!,” a candy-color musical treatment of criminalized youth.Platts-Mills’s film is unpretentiously atmospheric: The thick Cockney accents require subtitles, and Audience, an East End prog band, supplies a credible score. Its understatement impressed the New York Times critic Roger Greenspun who, appreciative, wrote that, “It takes a while, with ‘Bronco Bullfrog’ to realize that you are witnessing a love story, so free is it from the rhetoric of love, or love stories.”“Bronco Bullfrog” is essentially a study in frustration — economic, sexual, even cosmic. (Del matures at the very moment that his life unravels.) But its bleak ending is mitigated by the energy of the cast and the spirit of the filmmaking.Bronco BullfrogPlays Friday, March 25 through Thursday, March 31 at Film Forum, Manhattan; filmforum.org. More

  • in

    Hollywood Crosses the Pond

    Hollywood Crosses the PondEshe Nelson�� Reporting from Liverpool, EnglandMr. Lunt recalls watching a Batman stunt double launch himself off the top of one of the Liver Building’s towers. “It was very, very exciting,” he said. Liverpool is used to being a stand-in for American cities. It is 1920s New York in “Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them” and the Brooklyn docks in “Captain America: The First Avenger.”More than 80 percent of the record amount spent in 2021 on film and high-end TV productions in Britain is from American and other overseas production companies. More

  • in

    Vivien Leigh and Laurence Olivier’s Turbulent Relationship, Retold With Compassion

    In “Truly, Madly,” Stephen Galloway writes about one of the 20th century’s most glamorous couples, training an eye on Leigh’s mental health struggles.TRULY, MADLYVivien Leigh, Laurence Olivier and the Romance of the CenturyBy Stephen Galloway406 pages. Grand Central Publishing. $30.God help anyone who flew the friendly skies with Vivien Leigh, her second husband, Laurence Olivier, or both.1936: A struggling seaplane on which Leigh was a passenger went “thudding like a skimmed stone over the waves” en route to Capri, writes Stephen Galloway in “Truly, Madly,” a new book about the couple’s relationship, causing Leigh, a Catholic, to repeatedly invoke Saint Thérèse.1940: The newlyweds were en route from Lisbon to Bristol. The cockpit of their plane burst into flames, eerily echoing a dream of Olivier’s.World War II: The debonair Olivier, enlisted in the Fleet Air Arm of the Royal Navy but a pilot “of notorious incompetence,” according to the writer and editor Michael Korda, crashed his own plane twice and was demoted to target-towing, parachute-packing and recruitment demonstrations.1946: On a trans-Atlantic flight from New York, the lovebirds glanced out the window and saw an engine on fire. The Pan Am Clipper turned back and hit the ground with a long, hard bounce in Connecticut.1948: Leigh got breathless at 11,000 feet over the Tasman Sea; the plane had to descend several thousand feet, and the actress was given an oxygen mask. Traveling by air in the ensuing years, she suffered flashbacks that required her to be restrained and sedated.Best remembered for her role as Scarlett O’Hara in “Gone With the Wind” (1939), Leigh had bipolar disorder, known in her lifetime as manic depression (she later contracted tuberculosis as well). She was brittle, winsome and sociable: “The only person in the world who could be charming while she was throwing up,” Korda’s uncle, the director and producer Alexander Korda, told him. But then she would toggle rapidly, and at first confoundingly, to fits of temper and nervous breakdowns. The medications and therapies that might have stabilized her weren’t common at the time.And thus her three-decade entanglement with Olivier, considered one of the greatest talents of his generation, was its own sort of doomed flight: It soared sharply into the heavens, then was rocked with turbulence before its inevitable tumble down to earth and straight through to hell.There have been many, many previous biographies of Leigh and several of Olivier (including one by his oldest son, Tarquin, from a first marriage to Jill Esmond); a memoir by Olivier, “Confessions of an Actor”; and a memoir by his third wife, Dame Joan Plowright. There has even been at least one book, “Love Scene” (1978), devoted specifically to the Olivier-Leigh romance.But Galloway, the former executive editor of The Hollywood Reporter, is perhaps the first author to interpolate this oft-told story with commentary from contemporary mental-health experts, like Kay Redfield Jamison, the psychologist who herself suffers from bipolar disorder and wrote “An Unquiet Mind.” He accomplishes this smoothly, in a contribution to the LarViv literature that is — if not strictly essential — coherent, well-rounded and entertaining. To the couple’s tale of passion he adds compassion, along with the requisite lashings of gossip.Stephen Galloway, the author of “Truly, Madly: Vivien Leigh, Laurence Olivier, and the Romance of the Century.”Austin HargraveSome couples “meet cute.” Olivier espied Leigh playing a prostitute in “The Mask of Virtue” and was left “drunk with desire.” (They went on to get drunk on many other substances as well.) Unfortunately, they had both already married other people.The startlingly beautiful Leigh was born Vivian Hartley, an only child raised first in India and then shipped off to convent school in England. She took her stage surname from the middle name of her first husband, Herbert Holman. They had a daughter, Suzanne, but Leigh found the marriage “just another role in an interminable play,” Galloway writes, and “motherhood a repeat performance without the benefit of good writing.” The youngest of three siblings, Olivier lost his beloved mother when he was 12, and though less attached to his father — a clergyman of some oratorical gifts who “meted out affection in tranches, just like the Sunday roast he would cut into wafer-thin slices” — he was influenced by him to settle down early with Esmond. “That’s a noble idea,” Esmond responded when Olivier proposed for the second time. Trying to spice up their home life, he bought her a lemur from Harrods. The Brits are different.Leigh, Olivier and their spouses all became friends at garden parties, lunches and holidays. Reading how it all went down, quite civilized and drawing-room (Leigh asked Esmond how Larry liked his eggs cooked) but with plenty of jealousy, despair and child neglect, I was reminded of John Updike’s lesser-known infidelity novel, “Marry Me,” and Harold Pinter’s play “Betrayal.” (Leigh, who excelled onstage as Blanche in “A Streetcar Named Desire” before bringing her to the silver screen, and Olivier, a Shakespearean virtuoso, both preferred the theater to mercenary moviedom.)That the scandal of their relationship had to be initially covered up for the morality clauses of Hollywood just as they were having their big breakthroughs there — Leigh in “Gone With the Wind”; Olivier as Heathcliff in “Wuthering Heights” — surely only added to the excitement.Galloway clearly spent significant time in the archives (though frustratingly, a chunk of Leigh’s side of her correspondence with Olivier remains on the loose). Galloway splices this material seamlessly with old interviews and enough new ones with those Of That Era, such as Korda and Hayley Mills, to inject some pep and freshness. Re-encountering Leigh and Olivier’s highly literate fans, like Noël Coward and J.D. Salinger, and their foils, like the flamboyant critic Kenneth Tynan, is a treat. As are the old-fashioned words — like “martinet,” “popinjay” and “annealed” — that Galloway sprinkles through the text, the way Leigh strewed the beloved posies from her various country estates.This celebrated pair, whose doomed, disease-troubled love lends them a sheen denied to steadier partnerships, won between them half a dozen Oscars. It’s an enjoyable, disorienting sensation — as the Oscars now hemorrhage viewers and relevance — to find a time capsule from when movies and their stars didn’t just stream into our living rooms along with all the other space junk, but seemed the very center of the universe. More