More stories

  • in

    Kate Winslet Acknowledges Her Lesbian Scenes Got More Attention Than Her Other Love Scenes

    Neon

    When asked if conversation about her sex scenes with Saoirse Ronan felt distracting, the ‘Ammonite’ star stresses on the need to support the LGBTQ community and make them more visible.

    Mar 24, 2021

    AceShowbiz –
    Kate Winslet has been asked more about the lesbian scenes in her new film “Ammonite” than any heterosexual sex romps.

    The Oscar winner portrays real-life English paleontologist Mary Anning in the film, which chronicles her secret relationship with Charlotte Murchison, played by Saoirse Ronan. And the project is definitely getting attention – mainly because of the love scenes.

    “I definitely feel a sort of a duty to serve Mary Anning… and the story,” Kate told Digital Spy. “The story is so much about her, and her remarkable achievements that were unsung, unknown, re-appropriated by men, taken from her wrongfully.”

      See also…

    “I didn’t feel, ‘Oh, God, let me get away from the talking about the sex scenes and come back to that!’ but what I definitely found really striking is that people seem to talk about the love scenes in the film in ways that are much more focused, because it’s two women,” she continued.

    Kate further shared the reason why she did not mind the sex scenes talks. “I’m telling you, with my hand on my heart, I have never been asked the same volume of questions about love scenes of a heterosexual nature, of which I have shot many in my life. And so that to me… that’s a conversation,” she explained.

    The 45-year-old went on to express what she hope the movie could bring to the LGBTQ community. “You know, there’s no shame around this, it’s just two women who love each other. And for me, I really hope that that contributes to the evolution and progression of how audiences view LGBTQ people and their relationships just by normalizing it completely.”

    You can share this post!

    Next article

    Taylor Swift Quietly Joins Forces With Mother to Donate $50,000 to Family Hit by COVID-19 Death

    Related Posts More

  • in

    'John Wick' Creator Gets Sidelined for Fourth and Fifth Films

    Netflix/Niko Tavernise

    Though saying that he was not invited back by studio officials for the follow-ups, Derek Kolstad claims he is still close to Chad Stahelski and David Leitch, and is excited to see what the franchise will offer.

    Mar 24, 2021

    AceShowbiz –
    The creator and writer behind Keanu Reeves’ hit “John Wick” film series has reportedly been sidelined for the planned fourth and fifth movies in the action franchise.

    Derek Kolstad penned the 2014 original and its sequel, 2017’s “John Wick: Chapter 2”, while he also had a writing credit on 2019’s “John Wick: Chapter 3 – Parabellum”. However, he won’t be involved in the next two follow-ups, because Kolstad claims he simply wasn’t invited back by studio officials.

    He tells Collider, “It wasn’t my decision. When you think of the, contractually, of these things, the third one I shared the credit with any number of people, they didn’t have to come back to me, and so they didn’t.”

    Kolstad insists he has accepted the news and just wants the franchise to continue doing well.

    “At a certain stage the studio will tell you, your creation is graduated, and you wish it well. I’m still close with [filmmaker] Chad [Stahelski], still close with [John Wick co-director] David [Leitch], and I don’t know what’s going to happen. But I’m excited to see.”

      See also…

    Reeves is set to return as the titular hitman, with Chad Stahelski back in the director’s chair for “John Wick: Chapter 4”, which was solely written by Shay Hatten, who worked with Kolstad and two others on “Chapter 3”.

    Production is expected to begin soon ahead of a May, 2022 release date.

    Although Kolstad is no longer involved in the big screen projects, he is still working on “The Continental”, a TV spin-off series set in the John Wick universe, which has been optioned by U.S. network bosses at Starz.

    “Well, they’re about to make some pretty large announcements in the next couple of weeks in regards to what’s going to happen there. Can’t say much, but it’s happening,” Kolstad said of the upcoming show.

    You can share this post!

    Next article

    Kate Hudson’s 2-Year-Old Daughter Impresses Many With Her Cute Morning Yoga Pose

    Related Posts More

  • in

    'Black Widow' and 'Cruella' Will Hit Theaters and Disney+ at the Same Time Following Date Shifts

    Marvel Studios/Disney

    The Marvel movie isn’t the only movie which experience a new change as Emma Watson’s ‘Cruella’ has been set to premiere on Disney Plus and open in theaters at the same time this May.

    Mar 24, 2021

    AceShowbiz –
    Fans seemingly will be happy with a new announcement by Disney. In a tweet on Tuesday, March 24, Disney revealed that “Black Widow” arrive on both theaters and its streaming service Disney+ at the same time.

    ” ‘Black Widow,’ in theaters July 9 and on @DisneyPlus with Premier Access. Additional fees required,” so Disney’s official Twitter account tweeted. Fans must have a premium subscription to watch the Scarlett Johansson-led Marvel movie. In addition to the premium subscription, fans need to pay additional $30 charge for Premiere Access.

    “Black Widow” isn’t the only movie which experience a new change. Emma Watson’s “Cruella” has been set to premiere on Disney Plus and open in theaters at the same time.

      See also…

    The live-action flick based on the character Cruella de Vil will arrive as scheduled on May 28. Fans, however, have to wait a little bit as “Black Widow” has been pushed back two months and will debut on July 9 from its original premiere date on May 7.

    With the move, Marvel’s “Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings” is pushed back to September 3. The film was initially scheduled for a July premiere date. Meanwhile, Pixar’s animated coming-of-age flick “Luca” will no have traditional theatrical release. Fans can watch the movie with no additional cost on Disney Plus on June 18.

    Disney previously revealed that it would not opt out theatrical release entirely for its movies despite the massive refocus on streaming. Some titles, including “Free Guy” (August 13), “The King’s Man” (December 22), “Deep Water” (January 14, 2022) and “Death on the Nile” (February 11, 2022), can only be enjoyed on the big screen.

    “By leveraging a flexible distribution strategy in a dynamic marketplace that is beginning to recover from the global pandemic, we will continue to employ the best options to deliver The Walt Disney Company’s unparalleled storytelling to fans and families around the world,” Kareem Daniel, the chairman of Disney Media and Entertainment distribution, said.

    You can share this post!

    Next article

    Mike Tyson Brags About Evander Holyfield Match: The Fight Is On

    Related Posts More

  • in

    George Segal, Durable Veteran of Drama and TV Comedy, Is Dead at 87

    Best remembered for his role in “Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf?” but later memorable for his comedic work.George Segal, whose long career began in serious drama but who became one of America’s most reliable and familiar comic actors, first in the movies and later on television, died on Tuesday in Santa Rosa, Calif. He was 87. The cause was complications following bypass surgery, according to his wife, Sonia Segal, who announced his death.Sandy-haired, conventionally if imperfectly handsome, with a grin that could be charming or smug and a brow that could knit with sincerity or a lack of it, Mr. Segal walked a line between leading man and supporting actor.To younger people, he was best known for his work in comedy ensembles on prime-time network shows, playing the publisher of a fashion magazine on a titillation-fest,“Just Shoot Me!” and a frolicsome grandfather on a raucous family show set in the 1980s, “The Goldbergs.”But decades earlier, when he was a rising young actor, a handful of dramatic roles placed him on the verge of being an A-list star.In 1965 he starred as a conniving American corporal in a Japanese prisoner-of-war camp in “King Rat,” a grim survival drama based on a novel by James Clavell, leading a cast that included James Fox, Patrick O’Neal, Denholm Elliott and Tom Courtenay. The same year he played an idealistic painter whose agonizing and probably doomed love affair with a beautiful bourgeois young woman (Elizabeth Ashley) was one of several plotlines in Stanley Kramer’s adaptation of Katherine Anne Porter’s novel “Ship of Fools,” which places a buffet of class and ethnic conflicts aboard a German passenger ship on a trans-Atlantic crossing in the 1930s.“He looks real,” Mr. Kramer told Life magazine about Mr. Segal in 1965, “and he has what John Garfield had. He can draw appeal from an unsympathetic role.”From 1966 to 1968, Mr. Segal starred in three dramas adapted for television. In “The Desperate Hours,” he played Glenn Griffin, an escaped convict who holds a family hostage, a role made famous by Paul Newman on Broadway and Humphrey Bogart in the movies. In John Steinbeck’s “Of Mice and Men,” he was George, the itinerant farmworker who looks out for his friend Lenny (Nicol Williamson), a childlike behemoth. And he was Biff Loman, the elder son of Willy Loman (Lee J. Cobb, repeating his Broadway role), in Arthur Miller’s masterpiece of a warped and failed American dream, “Death of a Salesman.”George Segal in a portrait from 1965. The writer and director Mike Nichols found Mr. Segal’s  “conflicting quality — half rough and half gentle and the mind to control it — gives an element of surprise to whatever he does.”Associated Press“In the part of Biff, the son who rebels against the hollow dreams of his father,” The New York Times television critic Jack Gould wrote, “George Segal gave a performance of superbly controlled intensity, always modulating the outbursts of rage so that they did not overshadow the young man’s touching anguish.”In his best-remembered and best-rewarded dramatic role, Mr. Segal played Nick, the young husband in “Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf?” (1966), adapted from Edward Albee’s grueling depiction of marital combat.The film, directed by Mike Nichols, famously starred Richard Burton and Elizabeth Taylor as an embittered, longtime campus couple harboring a mutual delusion and, over the course of a long, boozy night in which they entertain a newly arrived biology professor (Mr. Segal) and his wife (Sandy Dennis), engaged in a scabrous war of words. All four actors were nominated for Oscars, Mr. Segal for the only time. (The women won.)Beginning in the late 1960s, however, Mr. Segal’s gift for comedy, especially social satire, redirected the path of his career. He spent most of the decade as a leading man in contemporary roles, generally in films aiming at both humor and poignancy in their observations of romance, marriage, friendship, class and the meaningful life.In “Bye Bye Braverman” (1968), directed by Sidney Lumet, he played a public relations man in the throes of contemplating mortality, one of four Jewish intellectuals, attending a funeral after the unexpected death of their mutual friend. In “No Way to Treat a Lady” (1968), an arch thriller, he played a detective being pestered by his mother (Eileen Heckart) to get married as he tracks a mother-obsessed serial killer (Rod Steiger). And in “Loving” (1970), one of his many films in which adultery was a theme, he played a freelance illustrator in career and marital crisis.In the 1970s, Mr. Segal was among Hollywood’s busiest and most recognizable actors, appearing in films whose comedy and outlook, sometimes strikingly out of whack with today’s sensibility, were characteristic of the decade.He starred with Ruth Gordon in “Where’s Poppa?” (1970), Carl Reiner’s outlandish and farcical comedy about a man determined to rid himself of his mother; opposite Barbra Streisand as a nebbishy writer involved with a prostitute in “The Owl and the Pussycat” (1970); and with Robert Redford in a manic crime caper, “The Hot Rock” (1972).In Paul Mazursky’s “Blume In Love” (1973), Mr. Segal played the title character, a divorce lawyer whose wife (Susan Anspach) catches him in bed with his secretary, divorces him and takes up with a renegade musician (Kris Kristofferson). The film rather sympathetically traces Blume’s desperate effort to win his wife back, which he manages to do only after getting drunk, raping her and getting her pregnant. (The film treats this as a transgression suitably redressed by a punch in the nose.)The same year he appeared in “A Touch of Class” as a married American businessman in London who blithely takes up with a willing divorcée (Glenda Jackson) — the character is way too willing, by today’s lights, to earn the sympathy and admiration the film intends — an affair that begins in high comedy and ends in sadness after the two fall in love and discover that infidelity is terrifically hard to schedule.And in “Fun With Dick and Jane” (1979), he and Jane Fonda starred as a pair of odd antiheroes, an affluent married couple whose debt-dependent life together is threatened when he loses his job as an aerospace engineer and they turn to crime to support the budget to which they had grown accustomed. The film, which received generally good reviews, is anachronistic in its good cheer regarding characters within what we now call the 1 percent, though some reviewers recognized the problem at the time.In “Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf?” with Elizabeth Taylor and Richard Burton. The film earned Mr. Segal his only Oscar nomination. Associated Press“Buried not very deeply within the film there is a small flaw,” Vincent Canby wrote in The New York Times. “We are asked to like and to sympathize with Dick and Jane, played by Mr. Segal and Miss Fonda with a fine, earnest kind of intensity I associate with good screwball comedy of the past, and we do like them enormously, even though the characters are completely dedicated to maintain all-wrong values.”“Dick and Jane” nonetheless underscored Mr. Segal’s strength as a comic actor; he was at his best in give-and-take roles, as a co-star, creating a dynamic partnership with another performer.To wit, perhaps Mr. Segal’s most enduring role from that time was in “California Split” (1974), Robert Altman’s wry, sometimes uproarious and yet naggingly melancholic portrait of a pair of compulsive, and essentially low-rent, gamblers (Elliott Gould was Mr. Segal’s compatriot and co-star) trolling for the big score at racetracks, casinos and poker parlors.“Their names are Bill and Charlie, and they’re played by George Segal and Elliott Gould with a combination of unaffected naturalism and sheer raw nervous exhaustion,” the critic Roger Ebert wrote in his review. “We don’t need to know anything about gambling to understand the odyssey they undertake to the tracks, to the private poker parties, to the bars, to Vegas, to the edge of defeat, and to the scene of victory. Their compulsion is so strong that it carries us along.”George Segal Jr. was born in New York City on Feb. 13, 1934, and grew up in Great Neck, on Long Island. His father was a malt and hops dealer; his mother was the former Fanny Bodkin. Young George was a musician — he played trombone as a boy and was proficient enough on the banjo to play in jazz bands in college and afterward — and he performed magic tricks at children’s parties.“I was a hopeless magician, so I jazzed up the act,” he told Life. “I’d open up with a few fast tricks, then two friends would come on and we’d start throwing shaving-cream pies at each other. The kids would always end up throwing cake at each other and everybody would have a wild time. Of course it was always a one-shot deal and we were never invited back.”He attended boarding school in Pennsylvania, moved on to Haverford College and eventually graduated from Columbia.George Segal, center, with Ben Gazzara, left, and Robert Vaughn, at a press event for “The Bridge at Remagen” in 1968.Associated PressHe worked in various unpaid jobs (ticket-taker, usher, orange soda vendor) at Circle in the Square, an Off Broadway theater. He eventually appeared there, in 1956, in Eugene O’Neill’s “The Iceman Cometh,” and married his first wife, Marion Sobel onstage on a Monday night when the theater was dark. Shortly thereafter he was drafted into the Army.After being discharged he followed the aspiring actor’s path, earning roles Off Broadway and gradually prying open the door to the movies and television. He was working with an improvisational troupe called the Premise when he was cast in his first film role, as a young doctor in a 1961 film called “The Young Doctors,” which starred Ben Gazzara and Fredric March.He had a small role in the World War II film “The Longest Day,” and in 1964 he appeared as a swaggery ladies’ man with Brian Bedford in an Off Broadway production of “The Knack,” a comedy by Ann Jellicoe, directed by Mike Nichols, who had once turned Mr. Segal down for a part but would subsequently cast him in “Virginia Woolf.”“When he came in to try out for me a few years ago,” Nichols said in 1965, “I saw a kind of arrogance I didn’t want. But I learned he’s not the tough guy he seems to be. What you get with George is masculinity and sensitivity, plus a brain. His conflicting quality — half rough and half gentle and the mind to control it — gives an element of surprise to whatever he does.”Mr. Segal, whose imperfect nose and Jewish surname made him an unlikely movie star in the 1960s, resisted suggestions that he fix both.“Listen, I don’t think there’s anything better than Cary Grant, the Cary Grant of ‘Bringing Up Baby’ and ‘The Philadelphia Story,’” he said in a New York Times interview in 1971. “And I think one of the best actors today is Robert Redford, and you don’t get much handsomer than that. But I guess I do like the fact that there isn’t so much artifice today.At the 40th Anniversary Chaplin Award Gala at Avery Fisher Hall in New York in 2013. “I’m like a cork in the water, aren’t I?” he mused in a 1998 interview.Andrew Kelly/Reuters“I was happy that Cary Grant was Cary Grant rather than Archie Leach” — Grant’s birth name — “but I didn’t change my name because I don’t think George Segal is an unwieldy name. It’s a Jewish name, but not unwieldy. Nor do I think my nose is unwieldy. I think a nose job is unwieldy. I can always spot ‘em. Having a nose job says more about a person than not having one. You always wonder what that person would be like without a nose job.”Mr. Segal’s first marriage ended in divorce. His second marriage, to Linda Rogoff, ended with her death in 1996. He is survived by his wife, Sonia. Details on other survivors were not immediately available. Mr. Segal’s stature as a star diminished in the 1980s, and his career flagged. He appeared in several television movies and returned to Broadway in 1985 for the first time in 22 years, appearing in a role played by Jackie Gleason in the movies — the manager of an aging boxer in Rod Serling’s drama, “Requiem for a Heavyweight” — but that production closed after just a few performances.Since then, in addition to his successful television series, Mr. Segal has appeared in small character roles in several films, including “The Cable Guy” (1996), a dark comedy with Jim Carrey and Matthew Broderick; “The Mirror Has Two Faces” (1996), a romantic melodrama directed by and starring Barbra Streisand; “Flirting With Disaster,” a comedy about a young man searching for his birth parents, with Ben Stiller, Téa Leoni, Patricia Arquette, Lily Tomlin, Alan Alda and Mary Tyler Moore; and “Love and Other Drugs” (2010), about a volatile love affair between a drug company representative (Jake Gyllenhaal) and a woman with Parkinson’s disease (Anne Hathaway).He has also appeared in recurring roles on television series including “Entourage” and “Tracey Takes On …,” with Tracey Ullman. “I’m like a cork in the water, aren’t I?” Mr. Segal observed about himself in a 1998 New York Times interview. “I keep bobbing up in all sorts of places, although I never know in advance where or when.”Neil Vigdor contributed reporting. More

  • in

    ‘Donny’s Bar Mitzvah’ Review: A Rude and Raunchy Coming-of-Age

    A boy becomes a man, and the writer-director Jonathan Kaufman is there, like a faux-VHS cameraman, to capture the juvenile festivities that ensue.The year is 1998. Donny Drucker (Steele Stebbins) is 13 years old and his family has thrown him a glitzy, red-carpet-worthy bar mitzvah, inviting classmates and relatives to toast his newfound adulthood. Shot entirely like camcorder footage from the point of view of a hired videographer, Jonathan Kaufman’s debut film, which he wrote and directed, has all the potential to be endearing and nostalgic, even if it’s slim on plot. Instead, “Donny’s Bar Mitzvah” — which is littered with chaotic party scenes of horny, dysfunctional attendees — oscillates between offensive and offensively unamusing.There’s little effort made to make the film actually look and feel like the ’90s. While it’s in 4:3 aspect ratio, the staticky old-school filter fails to lose its Instagram-era veneer. Beyond that, its tone-deaf comedy suggests an era when crude jokes about sensitive issues like race and addiction were commonplace and therefore acceptable.The only semblance of narrative cohesion here is the ridiculous undercover investigation of a literal “party pooper” (a side-plot that involves the cast’s biggest name, Danny Trejo), but otherwise “Donny’s Bar Mitzvah” is so scattered with half-baked skits that it’s not hard to imagine a better, funnier version of this movie made by an actual 13-year-old. It’s only 79 minutes long, but this critic spent the entire time sitting through gross-out gags hoping to laugh just once.Donny’s Bar MitzvahNot rated. Running time: 1 hour 19 minutes. Rent or buy on Amazon and Apple TV. More

  • in

    Katie Holmes to Take Double Duty in Film Adaptation of Jill Wine-Banks' 'The Watergate Girl'

    WENN/Instar

    Having snapped up the film rights to the Watergate prosecutor’s autobiography, the former ‘Dawson’s Creek’ star claims she was drawn to the story because of its relevance.

    Mar 23, 2021

    AceShowbiz –
    Katie Holmes has snapped up the film rights to Watergate prosecutor Jill Wine-Banks’ autobiography as her next project. The actress will star in and produce the adaptation of “The Watergate Girl: My Fight For Truth and Justice Against A Criminal President”, which was released just over a year ago in February 2020.

    Wine-Banks became a victim of intruders, who burgled her home, tapped her phones, and rifled through her trash after she was named one of three assistant Watergate special prosecutors – and the only woman – in the obstruction of justice trial against President Nixon’s top aides. She also had to deal with daily sexism and other issues, while trying to save her marriage.

      See also…

    “I’m excited to be working with Katie Holmes and am both honored and humbled to have my experience as the only woman on the Watergate trial team shared on the big screen,” Wine-Banks tells Deadline. “Though it was almost 50 years ago, the story of our investigation and trial remain compelling and relevant to current events and the sexism reflected in my story reverberates today. I hope this film opens up more dialogue around the challenges still facing professional women.”

    The actress adds, “I was drawn to this story because it is as relevant today as it was then. Women are constantly trying to break through the glass ceiling in the male workplace and this woman singlehandedly helped reshape the Watergate trial. I am constantly inspired by these strong female protagonists, and it is a world I will always want to explore.”

    You can share this post!

    Next article

    Claudia Jordan ‘Aggravated’ by Gary Owen’s Wife’s Claim of Her Involvement in Their Divorce More

  • in

    Michael Keaton Blames COVID-19 for Uncertainty of His Return as Batman in 'The Flash'

    WENN/Sheri Determan

    Insisting that he was not ‘being cute or coy,’ the actor who has played the Caped Crusader in two Tim Burton films claims he was too occupied with the pandemic that he has yet to take a look at the script.

    Mar 23, 2021

    AceShowbiz –
    Michael Keaton is refusing to confirm he’ll be putting the Batman suit on again for “The Flash”, because he’s too concerned about COVID-19 to take a look at the script.

    It has been reported that both he and Ben Affleck will portray Bruce Wayne and his alter ego in the upcoming DC Comics blockbuster, but Keaton, who played the Caped Crusader in two Tim Burton films in 1989 and 1992, insists he has yet to officially sign on.

    “I am needing a minute to think about it because I’m so fortunate and blessed,” he tells Deadline in a new interview. “I got so much going on now. I’m really into work right now… To tell you the truth, somewhere on my iPad is an iteration of the whole Flash thing that I haven’t had time yet [to check]…”

      See also…

    “I called them and said, ‘I have to be honest with you, I can’t look at anything right now. I’m so deep into this thing I’m doing. Also, I’m prepping a thing I’m producing and getting ready to do down the road in the fall that I’ll be in, and I feel responsible to that’.”

    “I’m not being cute or coy, but if I talked about it, I’ll be just bulls**tting you. I don’t really know. I have to look at the last draft. To be honest with you, you know what worries me more than anything about all this stuff…? It’s COVID.”

    “I’m more concerned. I keep my eye more on the COVID situation in the U.K. than anything. That will determine everything… I’m staying away from everybody, because the COVID thing has got me really concerned. So, that’s my first thing about all projects. I look at it and go, ‘Is this thing going to kill me, literally?’ And you know, if it doesn’t, then we talk.”

    Keaton adds, “I’m going to see what happens here… You want to say, like Joe Pesci from ‘My Cousin Vinny’…, ‘It’s a thing, but it’s not a thing’.”

    You can share this post!

    Next article

    Orlando Bloom’s Best Kiss Is Not His Fiancee Katy Perry

    Related Posts More