More stories

  • in

    Paul Bettany Dubs Daughter 'Incredibly Cruel Child' for Preferring Other Superheroes to His

    Instagram

    During an appearance on ‘The Kelly Clarkson Show’, the ‘WandaVision’ star also spills on what happened when he got Robert Downey Jr. on the phone to talk to his 9-year-old.

    Jan 22, 2021
    AceShowbiz – Actor Paul Bettany’s kids aren’t remotely interested in dad’s Marvel movie stardom.
    The Brit, who’s winning rave reviews for his role as robot Vision on new Disney+ TV series “WandaVision”, shares two kids with his wife Jennifer Connelly – 17-year-old Stellan and Agnes Lark, nine – but they seem non-plussed that their father, who also voiced Iron Man Tony Stark’s virtual assistant JARVIS, has become a Marvel favorite.
    “If my kids are impressed by me, they’re doing an incredible job hiding it from me,” he tells superfan Kelly Clarkson on her daytime talk show. “So no, they don’t seem to be.”

      See also…

    “My daughter has just always tortured me with preferring other superheroes to me and now what she’s done is just moved on entirely from Marvel and said she’s only interested in ‘Star Wars’. I mean, she’s an incredibly cruel child, you know.”
    [embedded content]
    But dad’s not the only big star she has turned down. “She told me she prefers Iron Man (character) to me…,” he adds. “I told Robert Downey (Jr.) and then Downey got on the phone with her. At that point she’d already moved onto (Marvel ‘Avengers’ co-star) Mark Ruffalo, you know. She wasn’t going to actually give that to Downey. It was very funny.”
    Bettany made his debut as Vision in 2015’s “Avengers: Age of Ultron”. Following his character’s demise in “Avengers: Endgame”, the character’s story transitions to small screen with the the Disney+ series.

    You can share this post!

    Next article
    DaniLeigh Defends Her Mixed Heritage After Accused of Colorism in New Song ‘Yellow Bone’

    Related Posts More

  • in

    'No Time to Die' Release Date Bumped Again to Fall

    Universal Pictures

    The newest installment of the spy film franchise is among the latest movies which releases are postponed amid the continuously rising number of coronavirus cases.

    Jan 22, 2021
    AceShowbiz – “No Time to Die” is facing yet another delay. After pushed back several times to April 2 of this year, the upcoming installment of the British spy film series has been postponed again for a fall release. MGM announced on Thursday, January 21 that the movie is going to hit theaters on October 8.
    Billed as the last James Bond film featuring Daniel Craig as the 007 agent, the Cary Joji Fukunaga-directed flick was originally slated to arrive in April 2020 before the coronavirus outbreak hit the U.S. It was then postponed until November 12, 2020. However, in October 2020, the movie was pushed back again to April 2021 as it became apparent that theatrical markets, especially in the United States, would not see full demand.
    “Those who have their eye on the long game understand that for a film like Bond, and many others, the prestige, exclusivity, and revenue generating potential of the movie theater is still undeniable and indeed still worth waiting for,” Paul Dergarabedian, senior media analyst at Comscore, said of the several delays.

      See also…

    The latest delay was unforeseen though, as the number of coronavirus cases in the country continues to spike. On the same day MGM announced the new date for “No Time to Die”, other movies have also been postponed due to the circumstances.
    They are “Peter Rabbit 2: The Runaway”, which is pushed back from January 15, 2021 to June 11, 2021, “Cinderella (2021)” which moves from February 5, 2021 to July 16, 2021, “Ghostbusters: Afterlife” due out on November 11, 2021 after previously slated to arrive on June 11, 2021, and “Uncharted” which is postponed from October 8, 2021 to February 11, 2022.
    While MGM and Sony, which hold the distribution rights for these above mentioned films, are still pushing for theatrical releases for their films, Warner Bros. has decided to bring all its 2021 slate to its streaming service.

    You can share this post!

    Next article
    Dakota Johnson Claims She’s Not a ‘Tattoo Fiend’ Despite Having ’11 or 12′ Tattoos

    Related Posts More

  • in

    Looking for a Great Courtroom Drama? Start Here

    #masthead-section-label, #masthead-bar-one { display: none }What to WatchBest Movies on NetflixBest of Disney PlusBest of Amazon PrimeBest Netflix DocumentariesNew on NetflixAdvertisementContinue reading the main storySupported byContinue reading the main storyGateway MoviesLooking for a Great Courtroom Drama? Start Here“Anatomy of a Murder,” starring Jimmy Stewart, is a legal drama that trusts audiences to dwell in gray areas.At the defense table, Lee Remick, left, Jimmy Stewart and Ben Gazzara, with Arthur O’Connell and Eve Arden behind them.Credit…Columbia PicturesJan. 21, 2021Updated 6:27 p.m. ETGateway Movies offers ways to begin exploring directors, genres and topics in film by examining a few streaming movies.Ready-made pressure-cookers that force audiences to question their own values, American courtroom movies are practically a genre of their own. Yet even the greatest ones give in to some pretty hokey dramatic impulses. Think of Jack Nicholson’s huffing, “You can’t handle the truth!” at the end of “A Few Good Men.” Paul Newman’s closing argument to the jury in “The Verdict” mentions faith, power and the symbols of justice — and not a single fact from the case.Otto Preminger’s “Anatomy of a Murder” (1959), one of the greatest trial movies, isn’t immune to that sort of grandstanding, but here the witness whose last-minute testimony wraps up the proceedings doesn’t neatly settle matters of guilt or innocence. By convention, courtroom films tend to tilt viewers’ sympathy toward an underdog or the wrongfully accused. But in “Anatomy of a Murder,” the defendant has indisputably committed the killing he’s accused of, and his defense lawyer is played by Jimmy Stewart — no one’s idea of an underdog, at least by the late ’50s. (He may have played one in “Mr. Smith Goes to Washington” in 1939, but was now well into the darker, postwar phase of his career.)Even the jazz score by Duke Ellington (who has a cameo) expresses a kind of brassy ambivalence; this is not a film inclined to easily hummable melodies or triumphal orchestral swells. It’s a legal drama that trusts audiences to dwell in gray areas — what one character calls the “natural impurities of the law.”“Anatomy of a Murder”: Rent it on Amazon, FandangoNow, Google Play or Vudu.“As a lawyer I’ve had to learn that people aren’t just good or just bad, but people are many things,” Paul Biegler (Stewart) says late in “Anatomy of a Murder,” in a line that is as close as the movie comes to stating its animating principle. It speaks to Preminger’s audacity that the film takes an hour before the camera enters a courtroom. The first section is devoted to establishing the characters, teasing out the facts of the case and devising a legal theory that might lead a jury to believe a killing was somehow excusable.Biegler is a small-time lawyer on Michigan’s Upper Peninsula, earning a comfortable living while the many fish he has time to catch pile up in his fridge. “I run a few abstracts and divorce Jane Doe from John Doe every once in a while,” he explains. He’s being modest: Although he doesn’t have much experience as a defense lawyer, he did used to be the district attorney. His knowledge of that office serves him well when he goes on a different kind of fishing expedition, tricking the current D.A. (Brooks West) into revealing crucial information about a polygraph test.The case involves a Korean War veteran, Lt. Frederick Manion (Ben Gazzara), who has shot and killed a bar owner named Barney Quill. The lieutenant’s wife, Laura (Lee Remick), had told him that Barney had raped her. “I have the unwritten law on my side,” Manion tells Biegler, but Biegler explains that the “unwritten law is a myth.”The case for letting Manion off will instead rest on a string of written legal premises. Maybe he committed murder in a dissociative state. Maybe that state meets the legal definition of insanity or maybe not. Maybe an obscure precedent from the state Supreme Court will allow Biegler to thread the needle.George C. Scott, left, Joseph N. Welch and Kathryn Grant in a scene from the classic drama.Credit…Columbia PicturesIs anyone implicated in this trial not culpable in some way or other? Certainly not Frederick, who is established as an abusive, jealous husband with a violent temper. And maybe not Laura. While victim blaming is anathema today, this is a movie made in 1959, and an assistant attorney general (George C. Scott) whom the district attorney has brought in for help goes to some lengths to insinuate to the jury that the way Laura dressed and acted on the night of the crime meant that she invited what happened to her. (In his telling, she may even have been “making a play” for Quill.) Preminger has already established Laura as a firecracker who could ignite: When she first meets Biegler at his office, she really makes herself at home on the couch. And Remick, whose performance toggles between vulnerability and flirtatiousness on a dime, creates a multidimensional character who remains a marvel of ambiguity.“Anatomy of a Murder” hardly represented Preminger’s first challenge to the Production Code Administration or to local censorship boards, both of which tried to police the subject matter presented in movies. His 1953 film “The Moon Is Blue,” a comedy deemed to have taken a scandalously flippant attitude toward sex, opened without the administration’s signoff. Preminger’s “The Man With the Golden Arm” (1955), starring Frank Sinatra, focused on a heroin addict.Nevertheless, “Anatomy of a Murder” still packs a punch with characters frankly discussing rape, contraception and panties. The judge, Weaver, has to ask the courtroom audience not to laugh whenever the undergarments are mentioned.While some other Preminger films of the era (“Bonjour Tristesse” from 1958 or “Porgy and Bess,” released the same year as “Murder”) used wide-screen formats like CinemaScope or Todd-AO, “Anatomy of a Murder” instead favors claustrophobic compositions that ask viewers to judge several characters’ reactions at once. Pay close attention to the questioning scenes: Preminger frequently takes care to keep the lawyer, the witness and — just a bit further in the background — the judge in focus simultaneously.About that judge: To the extent that there is a clear crime in “Anatomy of a Murder,” it is the scene stealing of Joseph N. Welch in the role. Amazingly, he wasn’t an actor at all: Welch is better known as the special counsel for the Army in the Army-McCarthy hearings of 1954, in which he gave Joseph McCarthy a dressing-down that contemporaneous audiences might have freshly remembered from television: “At long last, have you left no sense of decency?”After meeting with the lawyers from both sides in his chambers, Judge Weaver delivers a line of the ages of his own: “Skirmish over. Shall we join now on the field of battle?”AdvertisementContinue reading the main story More

  • in

    ‘The Human Factor’ Review: In Peace Talks Trust Is Vital and Elusive

    #masthead-section-label, #masthead-bar-one { display: none }What to WatchBest Movies on NetflixBest of Disney PlusBest of Amazon PrimeBest Netflix DocumentariesNew on NetflixAdvertisementContinue reading the main storySupported byContinue reading the main story‘The Human Factor’ Review: In Peace Talks Trust Is Vital and ElusiveNegotiators recall their advances and missteps in a quest for an Israeli-Palestinian peace. More

  • in

    ‘You Will Die at Twenty’ Review: Death, and Life, on the Nile

    #masthead-section-label, #masthead-bar-one { display: none }What to WatchBest Movies on NetflixBest of Disney PlusBest of Amazon PrimeBest Netflix DocumentariesNew on NetflixAdvertisementContinue reading the main storySupported byContinue reading the main storyCritic’s Pick‘You Will Die at Twenty’ Review: Death, and Life, on the NileIn his debut feature, Amjad Abu Alala deepens a fable-like premise into a lyrical confrontation with the certitudes of faith and the life-giving powers of doubt.Islam Mubarak in “You Will Die at Twenty.”Credit…Film MovementJan. 21, 2021, 7:00 a.m. ETYou Will Die at TwentyNYT Critic’s PickDirected by Amjad Abu AlalaDrama1h 43mFind TicketsWhen you purchase a ticket for an independently reviewed film through our site, we earn an affiliate commission.A folk tale turns existential in “You Will Die at Twenty,” the rapturous debut feature by the Sudanese filmmaker Amjad Abu Alala. In a sun-dappled village by the Nile, a holy sheikh tells Sakina (Islam Mubarak) that her newborn son, Muzamil, will live only two decades.The prophecy becomes too heavy a cross for their family to bear: Muzamil’s father soon abandons them, admitting softly to Sakina that he isn’t as strong as her. She’s left to raise their son alone, condemned to misery by her unshakable belief. Dressed in all black even while Muzamil is alive, she counts down his days on the walls of their hut. “Has sadness become a habit?” a fellow villager asks her.[embedded content]Alala deepens this simple, fable-like premise into a lyrical confrontation with the certitudes of faith and the life-giving powers of doubt. Raised strictly religious, Muzamil (a wonderfully sensitive Mustafa Shehata) goes through his 20th year dourly awaiting his fate, ignoring even the romantic attentions of his beautiful friend Naima (Bunna Khalid). Until, one day, he meets Uncle Sulaiman (Mahmoud Elsaraj), a wealthy drunk who has returned to the village after many years abroad. An archetypal tough-loving father figure, Sulaiman introduces our unworldly hero to movies, art and women. To never sin is to never truly know piety, he suggests.As Muzamil’s convictions begin to unravel, the movie’s ravishing compositions imbue the setting with the shimmer of myth. Dust-flecked beams of sunlight slice through shadows; green-robed dervishes glide down the Nile in boats; the turrets of a mosque pierce a startling blue sky. Avoiding didactic conclusions or pat answers, Alala’s film questions blind belief but finds boundless enchantment in every frame.You Will Die at TwentyNot rated. In Arabic, with subtitles. Running time: 1 hour 43 minutes. Watch at virtual cinemas through Film Movement.AdvertisementContinue reading the main story More