More stories

  • in

    Jason Biggs Dreading the Day His Kids Finally Get to See His Racy Movie 'American Pie'

    Universal Pictures

    The ‘Orange Is the New Black’ actor is really not looking forward to the day when his young children are finally old enough to watch his raunchy comedy movie.

    Feb 12, 2021
    AceShowbiz – Jason Biggs is dreading the day his young kids finally get to see dad making love to a pie in the raunchy film that helped make him famous.
    The “American Pie” actor became a household name when the comedy became a huge hit in 1999, but his kids Sid, six, and three-year-old Lazlo, are too young to see daddy’s most famous credit – and he’s glad he has a few years to prepare for that family film night.
    “Me watching American Pie with my kids is probably going to take on its own little weird thing,” the star told “Live with Kelly and Ryan”.

      See also…

    “Sid has heard of American Pie because he’s been with me when people have come up to me and he’s heard about it. He’s asked if he can see it and we’ve told him, ‘No, it’s rated R and you know, I have sex with a pie’… No, I didn’t tell him that… He knows it’s rated R for bad words. That’s his take. He said, ‘R for bad words, not violence’, which is very cute.”
    “The pie might say it’s little violent,” Biggs added with a laugh. “The pie might have a different (view).”
    Jason Biggs shared screen with the likes of Chris Klein, Natasha Lyonne, Thomas Ian Nicholas, Tara Reid, Mena Suvari, and Eugene Levy in the Paul Weitz-directed movie. He returned for the three sequels “American Pie 2” (2001), “American Wedding” (2003), and “American Reunion” (2012).
    The franchise also spawned a series of direct-to-DVD spin-offs which starred a whole new cast.

    You can share this post!

    Next article
    Meghan Markle Wins Legal Battle Against British Tabloid Over Invasion of Privacy More

  • in

    Amy Schumer Teasing 'Trainwreck' Sequel, J.K. Simmons Circling 'Being the Ricardos'

    WENN

    The ‘Snatched’ actress is keen to reunite with LeBron James for ‘Trainwreck 2’ while the ‘Whiplash’ star is close to joining Nicole Kidman and Javier Bardem in Aaron Sorkin’s new movie.

    Feb 12, 2021
    AceShowbiz – Amy Schumer and Lebron James are toying with fans’ dreams of a “Trainwreck” sequel.
    The comic teamed up with the basketball superstar for the 2015 film, which marked LeBron’s movie debut, and now both are starting to talk about a follow-up.
    Reposting a fan’s note on Instagram, which read, “We need another film with both of you together. Trainwreck is too darn funny,” Amy asked James, “Is this time next year good for you?”
    He replied, “I think we can make that happen! Trainwreck 2???” along with a shrugging emoji.
    Thrilled Schumer then gave fans of the film a big boost, writing, “Legoooooooo (sic).”

      See also…

    In the film, Amy played an unlucky in love magazine writer, who falls for Bill Hader’s sports doctor. His best friend is played by LeBron.
    In another news, Oscar winner J.K. Simmons and “Billions” star Nina Arianda are close to signing on to portray William Frawley and Vivian Vance in Aaron Sorkin’s new film, “Being the Ricardos”.
    Actors Frawley and Vance played neighbours Fred and Ethel Mertz in “I Love Lucy”.
    Nicole Kidman and Javier Bardem will tackle the roles of Lucille Ball and Desi Arnaz in the film.
    The movie will follow the couple and their associates over the course of a week, as Lucy and Desi face a crisis that could end their careers and another that could end their marriage, according to Deadline.
    Lucie Arnaz and Desi Arnaz Jr., Lucille and Desi’s kids, are among the film’s producers.

    You can share this post!

    Next article
    Jason Biggs Dreading the Day His Kids Finally Get to See His Racy Movie ‘American Pie’

    Related Posts More

  • in

    ‘To All the Boys: Always and Forever’ Review: Love Sweet Love

    #masthead-section-label, #masthead-bar-one { display: none }What to WatchBest Movies on NetflixBest of Disney PlusBest of Amazon PrimeBest Netflix DocumentariesNew on NetflixAdvertisementContinue reading the main storySupported byContinue reading the main story‘To All the Boys: Always and Forever’ Review: Love Sweet LoveThis final installment of the Netflix rom-com trilogy is earnest, bright-eyed and without a hint of cynicism.Noah Centineo and Lana Condor in “To All the Boys: Always and Forever.”Credit…Katie Yu/NetflixFeb. 11, 2021To All the Boys: Always and ForeverDirected by Michael FimognariComedy, Drama, Romance1h 49mFind TicketsWhen you purchase a ticket for an independently reviewed film through our site, we earn an affiliate commission.Levain’s double-chocolate cookies, Magnolia’s chocolate cupcakes: Among friends and family, I’m known as a notorious sugar fiend, a connoisseur of New York’s most seductive cavity-causers. And yet even my mighty sweet tooth has met its match in the form of a cinematic sweetmeat: “To All the Boys: Always and Forever.”The final installment of the Netflix rom-com (adapted from the book by Jenny Han) about a high school romantic’s secret love letters and her faux-fling-turned-real-thing with a popular jock finds our star couple in their senior year. It’s a seminal time in the life of these teens, Lara Jean Covey (Lana Condor) and Peter Kavinsky (Noah Centineo); there’s a journey to Korea, promposals, college acceptances, a cross-country trip to a beautifully mask-less New York City (where Levain and Magnolia make cameos) and a wedding. Lara Jean and Peter are still going strong and have a plan for college: They’ll both go to Stanford, natch. But when Lara Jean is rejected from Stanford and starts considering the other shapes her future could take, happily ever after gets a bit more complicated.[embedded content]“This is a little dramatic, even for you,” says Kitty (Anna Cathcart), Lara Jean’s little sister and professional heckler, observing the conflict. But that’s also this trilogy’s modus operandi: Its drama consists of adolescent trifles that never have real stakes, especially in the eyes of those who have left high school far behind. It doesn’t matter if you can see the tiny heartbreaks and grand gestures of love from a thousand miles away. “Always and Forever,” directed by Michael Fimognari with candy-cute sets, distressingly stylish costumes and vivacious cinematography, doesn’t have a hint of cynicism. Like Lara Jean herself, this bright-eyed pubescent lovefest is an earnest romantic, admiring every rote route to “I love you.” (The references to “Say Anything” and “Pride and Prejudice” are almost too much.)Condor and Centineo are as endearing as ever, like a teenage dream come to life, and both carry their characters’ rocky moments with ease. The main conflict, which is approached with a slow simmer (“Always and Forever” takes its time parading its lovers), sets up our heroine at a crossroads that, if this were another film, might have led to something more profound and surprising. Independence and personal growth vs. prioritizing a relationship at the cost of one’s self: This is the choice when a couple graduates past the little love notes and locker gifts of early infatuation.“To All the Boys” ultimately gets to have its cake (or, rather, cookies, in Lara Jean’s case) and eat it too, and even at its most saccharine I can’t fault it for committing fully to what it is. I’m no fan of Valentine’s Day unless it’s a heart-shaped confection, but for those who are, “To All the Boys” is a light but satisfying dessert.To All the Boys: Always and ForeverNot rated. Running time: 1 hour 49 minutes. Watch on Netflix.AdvertisementContinue reading the main story More

  • in

    The Golden Globes Celebrated Sia’s ‘Music.’ Autistic Activists Wish They Hadn’t.

    #masthead-section-label, #masthead-bar-one { display: none }What to WatchBest Movies on NetflixBest of Disney PlusBest of Amazon PrimeBest Netflix DocumentariesNew on NetflixAdvertisementContinue reading the main storySupported byContinue reading the main storyThe Golden Globes Celebrated Sia’s ‘Music.’ Autistic Activists Wish They Hadn’t.Three decades after “Rain Man,” detractors say this new film about an autistic character is regressive and potentially harmful.Maddie Ziegler, left, and Kate Hudson in “Music.” Ziegler plays the title character, which the director, Sia, has said is based on an autistic boy she knew.Credit…Merrick Morton/Vertical EntertainmentFeb. 11, 2021Updated 5:45 p.m. ETWhen Charlie Hancock first heard about a new musical movie centered on a girl on the spectrum, she was thrilled. “I thought, ‘Great. I love musicals,’” said Hancock, a first-year student at Oxford University who is autistic and wrote an essay on the film. “‘This could be an opportunity for more representation and perhaps a type that we haven’t seen before.’”Her excitement quickly turned to distress.As details emerged in the last few months about that film, “Music,” which is directed and co-written by the pop star Sia, disability rights advocates grew increasingly concerned about potential bias in the plot as well as the decision to cast a performer who wasn’t autistic. Those worries escalated into a backlash in November, when the trailer’s release set off a fight between the musician-turned-filmmaker and her online critics, and again in January, when leaked scenes seemingly endorsed a controversial physical restraint technique. Then, to the surprise of industry insiders and the autism world alike, the film garnered two Golden Globe nominations last week. Though Sia has since offered an olive branch to detractors, the anger remains.“Nominating ‘Emily in Paris’ is one thing. It’s a harmless bit of mediocre fluff,” Ashley Wool, an autistic actress in upstate New York, said, referring to the Netflix series that also received surprise Globe nominations. “‘Music’ is something that’s doing active harm to people. This gives it a veneer of legitimacy that it doesn’t deserve.”The film will be available on demand Feb. 12 in the United States but has already opened in Sia’s native Australia to dismal reviews and a weak box office. It follows a girl named Music and her newly sober half sister, Zu (Kate Hudson), who becomes Music’s guardian. Music, played by Maddie Ziegler, can’t speak, and viewers are simply told that she is a “magical little girl” who sees the world differently. Song-and-dance interludes illustrate what’s going on inside Music’s head. Sia, who has said Music was based on an autistic boy she knew, has described the film as “‘Rain Man’ the musical, but with girls.”Dustin Hoffman and Tom Cruise in “Rain Man.” Disability rights advocates say Hoffman’s character played into stereotypes about autism. Credit…United ArtistsYet that 1988 film represents exactly the kind of stereotypical portrayal that disability rights advocates say they don’t want to see in 2021: a neurotypical star (Dustin Hoffman) playing an autistic savant stereotype. Research shows that disabled characters are overwhelmingly played by nondisabled actors on film and TV. A recent rare exception was Pixar’s 2020 animated short film “Loop” that won praise for featuring a nonspeaking autistic actress of color in the lead voice role.Like Music, the “Loop” actress and character had difficulty forming words but still frequently vocalized. More common is the casting of a nonautistic performer like Ziegler. The actress, a recurring Sia collaborator, ultimately replaced “a beautiful young girl nonverbal on the spectrum” who found the experience “unpleasant and stressful,” Sia said in a tweet.Because there are so few autistic characters onscreen, choices about depictions matter greatly, critics contend. “Some people might say any representation is better than nothing. I’ve heard that argument as a Black person. I’ve heard it as queer person. I’ve heard it as a woman. I’ve heard it as an autistic,” said Morenike Giwa Onaiwu, a visiting scholar in humanities at Rice University. “I’m tired of the scraps and the crumbs. I’d rather not see us on the screen than see us in a way that fuels stigma.”Publicists for “Music” did not reply to requests to speak to Sia or to clarify details surrounding the film for this article. Publicists for Hudson and Ziegler, who was 14 when the film was shot in 2017, did not respond to requests for comment.Many detractors say problems with the film are, as Hancock put it, “baked into its very DNA” because Music isn’t really at the center of “Music.” Instead, they say, it’s Zu who is given a complex narrative of growth and depth; Music merely serves as a catalyst to help Zu on her journey to become a better person. It’s “the idea that we’re not characters or people in our own right,” Hancock added, “but we exist in order to inspire the nondisabled people in our lives and, by extension, the audience.”After the first trailer dropped in November and activists on Twitter criticized the film’s approach, Sia reacted angrily, arguing that she had spent three years on research and that her intentions were “awesome.” When one autistic performer said she felt that “zero effort” had been made to cast an autistic lead, Sia replied, “Maybe you’re just a bad actor.”Musical interludes in Sia’s film, with Hudson, left, and Ziegler, serve to illustrate what’s going on in Music’s  mind.Credit…Merrick Morton/Vertical EntertainmentFor autistic artists, the fact that Sia said a neurotypical actress was recast as the lead sends the troubling message that autistic people are bad hires.“First, it’s undermining autistic people’s capabilities and making us out to be infants,” Chloé Hayden, an autistic actress in Australia, said. “Second, if your film is about inclusion, but you’re not making the actual film set inclusive, it completely belittles the entire point.”Critics have also taken issue with two scenes showing Music having a meltdown and being subjected to prone restraint, a practice in which people, often disabled, are put in a facedown position while force is used to subdue them. Versions of the method have been linked to serious injuries and death. But when a saintly neighbor, played by Leslie Odom Jr., restrains Music, it’s portrayed as an act of kindness: He lies on top of her and says he’s “crushing her” with his love. Later, in a public park, he instructs Zu on how to use the restraint on Music.“It really shows that a project about autism will be hollow and not serve our needs — and can even be harmful to us — if we’re not helping tell the story,” Zoe Gross, director of advocacy at the Autistic Self Advocacy Network, said. “This is something that could kill people.”In an emailed statement, Odom said, “When we make something or when we sign up to help someone we respect make something, our hope is always that the work is the beginning of a conversation. The filmmakers make the art, but we don’t get to dictate or decide the contents or parameters of the ensuing conversation. The other half of the conversation regarding this work is just beginning. I am listening.”Following the news earlier this month that “Music” had been nominated for two Golden Globes (best musical or comedy, and best actress for Hudson), three advocacy organizations — Gross’s network, CommunicationFIRST and the Alliance Against Seclusion and Restraint — joined to issue an open letter expressing “grave concerns” about the restraint scenes and calling for the film to be pulled from release.The letter noted that “a committee of nonspeaking and autistic people” had been invited to screen the film and provide feedback in late January, and the filmmakers “failed to respond and address” their recommendations, including cutting the prone restraint scenes entirely.Hours after the nominations, Sia tweeted an apology and said that her “research was clearly not thorough enough” and that she had “listened to the wrong people.” The star, who soon after deactivated her Twitter account, also announced that a warning would be added to the film stating that it “in no way condones or recommends the use of restraint on autistic people,” and that those scenes would be removed from “all future printings.” Those scenes remained in a screener provided to a New York Times critic reviewing the film.A change.org petition calling for the film to be “canceled” has nearly 19,000 signatures. But Onaiwu of Rice University said she was not looking to destroy anyone’s career, even if she condemned the film.“It’s not about demonizing Sia. You’re not canceled. We need allies and powerful voices,” Onaiwu said. “Use your platform to try to help dismantle ableism and promote neurodiversity and make opportunities for autistic people. You can use your experience to do that.”AdvertisementContinue reading the main story More

  • in

    Tina Turner Documentary Scheduled for April Release

    WENN

    Coming from Oscar-winning directors, the upcoming movie that chronicles the life and career of the Queen of Rock and Roll has been set to debut in April this year.

    Feb 12, 2021
    AceShowbiz – A new documentary about Tina Turner will be released in the UK in April.
    The project, simply titled “Tina”, has been described as “the ultimate celebration of a global superstar” and has been directed by Oscar-winning filmmakers Dan Lindsay and T.J Martin. A synopsis for “Tina” – which tells the story of the chart-topping music star – reads, “From her early career as the queen of R&B to her record-breaking sell-out arena tours of the 80s, Tina Turner draws back the curtain to invite us into her private world in a way she has never done before.”
    “Revealing her inner-most struggles, and sharing some of her most personal moments, Tina is the defining and inspirational record of one of the greatest survivors in modern music.”
    Producers at Lightbox, the same company behind the 2012 Rodriguez documentary, “Searching for Sugar Man”, have been granted exclusive access to the retired rock icon for a new project, which will delve into “The Best” hitmaker’s life and career.

      See also…

    The film is part of a new block of content booked to air on U.K. network Sky.
    The release date was revealed as Tina Turner was announced as a nominee for the upcoming Rock and Roll Hall of Fame induction.
    Other candidates for Class of 2021 include Mary J. Blige, Jay-Z, LL Cool J, Foo Fighters, Dionne Warwick, the late Nigerian musicial icon Fela Kuti, Carole King, Kate Bush, Devo, Chaka Khan, Todd Rundgren, the New York Dolls, and Rage Against the Machine.
    Music fans can cast their votes for their favourite stars beginning Wednesday through 30 April on the Rock Halls website.

    You can share this post!

    Next article
    Robin Thicke Lost Confidence in His Own Music as He ‘Chased’ Fame During Early Career

    Related Posts More

  • in

    'Framing Britney Spears' Filmmakers Talk About Their Process

    #masthead-section-label, #masthead-bar-one { display: none }Britney Spears’s Legal BattleControl of Spears’s EstateThe ‘Free Britney’ MovementWatch ‘Framing Britney Spears’ in the U.S.Making the DocumentaryAdvertisementContinue reading the main storySupported byContinue reading the main storyTimes InsiderBehind the Making of ‘Framing Britney Spears’The director and a senior editor of the Times documentary answered viewer questions about the media response, the star’s mother and searching for clues on Instagram.A new documentary from The New York Times examines the so-called Free Britney movement made up of fans of the pop star Britney Spears.CreditCredit…G. Paul Burnett/The New York TimesFeb. 11, 2021Updated 2:22 p.m. ETTimes Insider explains who we are and what we do, and delivers behind-the-scenes insights into how our journalism comes together.The premiere last week of the film “Framing Britney Spears,” part of the TV documentary series “The New York Times Presents,” looked closely at Ms. Spears’s legal battle with her father, Jamie Spears, over control of her finances. For more than a decade, that control has been held largely by Mr. Spears in a conservatorship, a complex legal arrangement typically used for the sick or elderly.Since the film’s release on FX and Hulu, celebrities and fans have expressed their support for Ms. Spears on social media. The latest court hearing in the fight was scheduled for Thursday in Los Angeles. On Wednesday, Samantha Stark, the director, and Liz Day, a senior editor on the film, answered questions from readers in an “Ask Me Anything” session on the website Reddit. The following are edited excerpts.Were there any legal hurdles you faced in making the film?LIZ DAY We did not receive any direct legal threats while making the documentary. Reporting any investigative story requires extreme attention to factual accuracy and fairness, and this project was no different, though it was made even more difficult by an ongoing court case, attorney-client privilege, medical privacy, celebrity nondisclosure agreements, distrust of the press and other factors.What is the involvement of Lynne Spears, Britney’s mother, in all of this?SAMANTHA STARK So what we know about Lynne Spears is that she is not legally a part of Britney’s conservatorship team. We know she recently petitioned to be included to have access to more information and to be able to have her lawyer speak during the hearings, and that she filed as an “interested party” to do that.It’s unclear what involvement Lynne had related to the conservatorship up until recently. In a Nov. 10 hearing, Lynne said, through her lawyer (and I’m paraphrasing) that she thanked Jamie for the work he had been doing but that she wanted Britney to wake up to see brighter days. It’s very hard to understand what role Jamie, Lynne or a number of other people have played throughout the conservatorship because so many of the court records are sealed.What’s your view on the media response to the documentary? It feels as if many of the outlets that disparaged Britney years ago are now doing thinkpieces about how the media destroyed her.STARK There’s one thing I noticed in the past week doing interviews with media outlets that I never even thought of before the film came out. When Britney was being shamed for her sexuality as a teenager and stalked as a young adult, the gatekeepers to all these media outlets — the ones doing the shaming — were in their 30s, 40s, 50s. We as teenagers watched that happen. Now that my/our generation are a lot of the gatekeepers, we’re saying “no more.”How should those media outlets respond after playing a part in all the derision that Britney endured?STARK I think they should respond by not ever doing anything like it ever again. I think they should take a note from Britney’s book and be kindhearted, open and nonjudgmental.Did you contact any of Britney’s ex-husbands or boyfriends, like Jason Alexander, Kevin Federline, Jason Trawick or Charlie Ebersol, or some of her photographers/videographers, like David LaChappelle and Nigel Dick?DAY Yes, at the end of the doc we listed the members of Ms. Spears’s family who we requested on-camera interviews with but who did not respond or declined. But we reached out to a lot more people than just that list, including the ex-husbands/boyfriends mentioned. We spoke with Nigel Dick and reached out to David LaChappelle too. There were many people we spoke with on background who did not appear on camera. There were also a few people whose on-camera interviews we did not include because of time.Britney Spears hasn’t been able to fully control her career for 13 years under a court-sanctioned conservatorship. A New York Times documentary, now streaming on FX and Hulu, examines the pop star’s court battle with her father for control of her estate.CreditCredit…Ting-Li Wang/The New York TimesWhat are your thoughts on the obsessive Britney fans who question and dissect her social media posts?STARK There’s such a tight circle around Ms. Spears, seemingly enabled by the conservatorship, that it’s really hard to ask her how she is or what she thinks. We know that she hasn’t done interviews in a long time and that when she did for many years she was likely under very careful watch. So I honestly think it makes sense for people to look to her Instagram to try and parse how she might be doing. It’s the only place we’ve been able to see or hear from her for quite some time.Did you look at the financial records? Forbes has estimated her wealth at $60 million. Shouldn’t it be higher?DAY Excellent question. Britney’s true net worth is a mystery, and there’s speculation that there may be a lot more money beyond $60 million outside of her estate, in trusts or elsewhere as royalties, intellectual property and more. There are lots of companies set up as private LLCs, of which records are scant. One thing I would add is that often when you hear big Hollywood paychecks, you have to consider everyone who is taking a cut — managers, lawyers and government taxes, for example.Did you expect this film would result in a big resurgence of the #FreeBritney movement?STARK When making a film, I never know what parts of the piece will hit people in the emotional gut. I really had no idea this would happen.AdvertisementContinue reading the main story More

  • in

    Tom Holland Refuses to Hide 'Much Cooler' Haircut Under Wig for 'Spider-Man: Far From Home' Sequel

    WENN

    The Peter Parker depicter insists on keeping his new haircut from upcoming video game adaptation ‘Uncharted’ as the actor begins to film the upcoming third Spidey film.

    Feb 12, 2021
    AceShowbiz – Actor Tom Holland left Marvel bosses with little choice but to accept his change of hairstyle for the next Spider-Man movie after refusing to wear a wig.
    The Brit had to start work on the follow-up to 2019’s “Spider-Man: Far From Home” in October (20), just days after completing another action blockbuster, “Uncharted”, for which he adopted a “much cooler” haircut, with shaved sides, to play adventure-seeking protagonist Nathan Drake.
    However, when he arrived on the superhero set in Atlanta, Georgia, hair and wardrobe officials tried to convince him he really should don a hairpiece to resemble the nerdy Peter Parker/Spider-Man character fans had come to love him for.
    “I have cool shaved sides and it’s slick at the back, and that’s not very Peter Parker,” Holland told Esquire of his “Uncharted” look.

      See also…

    “He (Parker)’s a bit of a loser. So they put this wig on me that was just around the sides.”
    But Holland was not impressed and fought against the suggestion – and won. “For the first time in my life, I put my foot down as the leading actor and was like, ‘I’m not f**king wearing that wig,'” he shared.
    “‘I’m going to have shorter hair and you’re going to have to deal with it!'”
    The as-yet-untitled sequel, part of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, is expected to be released in December (21).
    Tom Holland’s other new movies include hard-hitting crime drama “Cherry”, where he plays a struggling drug addict, and Doug Liman’s sci-fi action adventure “Chaos Walking”, where he shares screen with Daisy Ridley.

    You can share this post!

    Next article
    Spike Lee Pleads With African-Americans to Get Covid-19 Vaccination

    Related Posts More

  • in

    ‘French Exit’ Review: A Not-So-Merry Widow

    #masthead-section-label, #masthead-bar-one { display: none }What to WatchBest Movies on NetflixBest of Disney PlusBest of Amazon PrimeBest Netflix DocumentariesNew on NetflixAdvertisementContinue reading the main storySupported byContinue reading the main story‘French Exit’ Review: A Not-So-Merry WidowMichelle Pfeiffer is sensational as a newly insolvent socialite in this strange, sad comedy.Michelle Pfeiffer in “French Exit.”Credit…Lou Scamble/Sony Pictures ClassicsFeb. 11, 2021, 1:24 p.m. ETFrench ExitDirected by Azazel JacobsComedy, DramaR1h 50mFind TicketsWhen you purchase a ticket for an independently reviewed film through our site, we earn an affiliate commission.As if rebounding as far as possible from her hard-luck character in the 2018 drama “Where Is Kyra?,” Michelle Pfeiffer glams it up as an imperious New York dowager in “French Exit.” Floating through scenes in fur-trimmed coats and slinky peignoirs, nose in the air and martini glass in a death grip, Pfeiffer is Frances Price, a diva of disdain.The role is far juicier than the movie around it, a melancholy farce of disappearing privilege and insouciant parenting.“It’s all gone,” Frances’s accountant says, referring to her money. Yet the line encapsulates the essence of a movie that trembles with loss: Looks, home, love and life itself are on the fade. After years of ignoring her dwindling fortune, Frances, along with her depressive adult son, Malcolm (Lucas Hedges), must sell up and accept the loan of a friend’s vacation apartment in Paris. The length of stay is undefined, but, this time, Francis doesn’t intend to outlast the dribble of cash that remains.Too listless to fizz and too peculiar to win us over, “French Exit,” directed by Azazel Jacobs, is hampered by clockwork quirkiness and disaffected dialogue. What little there is of a plot — which includes multiple séances and a talking cat — doesn’t so much progress as coagulate around a coterie of eccentrics: A pathetically lonely expat (Valerie Mahaffey), a mirthless fortuneteller (Danielle Macdonald) and a smooth private investigator (Isaach De Bankolé), all of whom will eventually congregate in the Paris apartment. Not-so-high jinks ensue.Adapting his 2018 novel of the same name, Patrick DeWitt holds fast to his amoral heroine, a woman whose sometimes appalling behavior is neither apologized for nor regretted. Its reverberations, though, have shaped Malcolm into a passive companion, so devoted he’s willing to dump his fiancée (Imogen Poots) to accompany his mother to Paris. The character is a drip, and Hedges, despite a commendable refusal to steer into the skid for comic gain, never makes him remotely interesting.Pfeiffer is flat-out fabulous here, at once chilly and poignant. As Frances dispenses the last of her money to homeless men in the park, her largess seems more to do with weariness than compassion, her beneficiaries simply useful receptacles for something she no longer needs. A strange mixture of highbrow looniness and quiet rue, “French Exit” is finally less about one woman’s desire to die than about her inability to summon the energy to live.French ExitRated R for a disgusting death and a great deal of drinking. Running time: 1 hour 50 minutes. In select theaters. Please consult the guidelines outlined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention before watching movies inside theaters.AdvertisementContinue reading the main story More