More stories

  • in

    ‘Rising High’ Review: From Rags to Riches, Without a Conscience

    “Rising High” is a white collar crime movie with little pizazz and even less substance. Now on Netflix, the fast-paced German drama aspires to the wily satire of “The Wolf of Wall Street,” but the spectacle of greed that it showcases is neither as engrossing nor as demoralizing. It’s just plain old trashy.The movie opens on a rowdy mansion party hosted by our millionaire hero, Viktor (David Kross). A baby-faced real estate mogul with a chip on his shoulder, he awakens, hung over, to a team of policemen arresting him for tax evasion, money laundering and fraud. He’s soon in prison, recounting the story of his rise to a visiting journalist. With this framework, the writer-director Cüneyt Kaya launches a wholly familiar rags-to-Corvettes tale in which Viktor cons, cheats and bribes his way from eager entrepreneurialism to the drugged-out, festive top.“Rising High” slots cleanly into a genre of rich-dude movies that encourage us to revel in their characters’ grandeur. Cocaine and sparkly gems are abundant, and Kaya animates party scenes with quick cuts and pulsating dance beats to signal that Viktor’s lifestyle is super sexy. But the abundance gets repetitive, and Viktor’s glory is rendered with too much cliché to sustain a sense of allure. Simultaneously, Kaya tries to play the goofy antics of Viktor and his lowlife buddy Gerry (Frederick Lau) for genial laughs. Most of the time instead — as when Gerry threatens to fire a roomful of employees lest they break out into song — they inspire a weak grimace.Such swaggering portraits of wealth often come with a question: Does it fetishize greed or condemn it? “Rising High” doesn’t achieve either. There is a startling amorality to its treatment of women, particularly the sex workers that Viktor, Gerry and Kaya’s camera frequently degrade. But other than its misogyny, the movie, stacked with try-hard hedonism, fails to provoke more than mild annoyance.Rising HighNot rated. In German, with subtitles. Running time: 1 hour 34 minutes. More

  • in

    Comfort Viewing: Three Reasons I Love the Movie ‘Tangled’

    Rapunzel is stuck at home. And she’s bored as hell.She’s baking. She’s doing jigsaw puzzles. She’s sweeping the floor and doing laundry and knitting an endless scarf she’ll probably never wear. (She’s also combing through 70 feet of hair, and playing hide and seek with a spunky animated chameleon. Otherwise, it’s all fairly banal.)The whole scene, from the opening number of Disney’s “Tangled,” may feel a tad too familiar right now to qualify as escapism. Rapunzel, though, is trapped in her tower by an evil maternal figure, not a pandemic; she hasn’t gone outdoors in 18 years — far longer, hopefully, than any period of self-isolation we will have to endure this year.But despite the parallels, I find myself returning to this film again and again, even during — especially during — a global crisis. It’s part classic, heartwarming princess tale, part princess fighting her way through the kingdom with nothing but a frying pan, some magic hair and a partner in crime who stumbled on her abode by mistake.“Tangled,” one of Disney’s early forays into computer animation, came at a pivotal time for the studio. Its early 2000s lineup (remember “Chicken Little”?) was a far cry from the princess blockbusters of the ’90s (like “The Little Mermaid” or “Beauty and the Beast”). Disney needed another hit, and it was this 2010 action-filled take on Rapunzel’s story that finally delivered.Nearly a decade later, “Tangled” still holds up. There’s witty dialogue, Zachary Levi, characters who blur the line between heroes and villains, Zachary Levi, delightfully emotive animal sidekicks and a swashbuckling rogue — Zachary Levi — with a smorgasbord of Hot Guy Features handpicked by the women of Walt Disney Animation Studios. (Ladies, we are forever in your debt.) More

  • in

    'Spider-Man' Director Sam Raimi Confirmed for 'Doctor Strange' Sequel

    WENN

    The filmmaker who helmed the original ‘Spider-Man’ trilogy fronted by Tobey Maguire has been signed up to sit behind the lens for the upcoming ‘Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness’.
    Apr 17, 2020
    AceShowbiz – Filmmaker Sam Raimi has finally confirmed he’s onboard to direct the upcoming sequel, “Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness”.
    Raimi, who helmed Tobey Maguire’s original “Spider-Man” trilogy, has long been rumoured to be involved with the project, and told website ComingSoon.net he finds it “very funny” how he’s ended up working on the movie following a particularly prophetic line in 2004’s “Spider-Man 2”.
    In the film, J.K. Simmons’ character J. Jonah Jameson is trying to come up with a catchy name for Dr. Otto Octavius, and one of the suggestions is Doctor Strange.
    “That’s pretty good,” Jameson says. “But it’s taken!”
    “When we had that moment in Spider-Man 2, I had no idea that we would ever be making a Doctor Strange movie,” Raimi told the publication. “It was really funny to me that coincidentally that line was in the movie.”
    “I wish we had the foresight to know that I was going to be involved in the project.”
    Explaining his attraction to the Marvel franchise, he added, “I loved Doctor Strange as a kid, but he was always after Spider-Man and Batman for me… He was probably at number five for me of great comic book characters. He was so original.”
    It was previously revealed that Benedict Cumberbatch’s titular sorcerer will be joined by Elizabeth Olsen’s Wanda Maximoff/Scarlet Witch for the follow-up to the hit 2016 movie, “Doctor Strange”.
    “Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness” hits theatres on November 5, 2021

    You can share this post!

    Next article
    Dolly Parton Warns That Men Will Only Hold Back Women’s Career

    Related Posts More

  • in

    John Krasinski In Talks to Join Marvel

    WENN

    The former star of ‘The Office’ who once lost Captain America role to Chris Evans has reportedly met Marvel boss Kevin Feige for a possible future project.
    Apr 17, 2020
    AceShowbiz – Actor John Krasinski could be set to join the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) if reported talks with boss Kevin Feige go according to plan.
    Website Geeks WorldWide reported the 40-year-old “The Office” star has allegedly taken a virtual meeting with Feige, and the pair are keen to work with one another in the future.
    “The studio has been taking virtual meetings with various actors, writers, and directors over the past weeks, and one of those people is none other than John Krasinski,” a source said. “Krasinski and Marvel Studios President Kevin Feige have both said they’d love to work together, and it seems that’s now closer to happening than ever before.”
    They added, “While I’m not sure of the role he’d take in the MCU, whether it be that of a director, writer, or actor, I do know they discussed a multitude of projects during their meeting.”
    Although the insider claimed there’s no offer for a particular role on the table as yet, Krasinski previously told Esquire magazine he’d love to take on the role of Mister Fantastic, also known as Richard Reed, in the Fantastic Four franchise, previously played by Ioan Gruffudd and Miles Teller.
    The star previously lost the role of Captain America to Chris Evans.
    Meanwhile, the “A Quiet Place” writer/director is spending the coronavirus lockdown hosting his new web series Some Good News, which is available to view on his YouTube channel.

    You can share this post!

    Next article
    Prince William Opens Coronavirus Hospital in U.K.

    Related Posts More

  • in

    ‘Beyond the Visible: Hilma af Klint’ Review: What Did She See, and When?

    The career-spanning exhibition of the work of Hilma af Klint that toured the world a few years ago — including a sojourn at the Guggenheim Museum in Manhattan — upended the conventional narrative of modern art history. This is hardly an academic matter. As Roberta Smith wrote in her review of the Guggenheim show, af Klint’s “paintings definitively explode the notion of modernist abstraction as a male project” — a revolution thought to have started with Vasily Kandinsky and Piet Mondrian in the years just before World War I and carried to heroic fruition by the likes of Mark Rothko and Jackson Pollock after World War II.But af Klint, as Smith put it, “got there first.” Born in 1862 to an aristocratic Swedish family and raised partly on the grounds of the military academy where her father was an instructor, she trained at the Royal Academy of Fine Arts in Stockholm, mastering the traditional genres of portrait, still life and landscape. By the late 1880s, her notebooks and paintings began incorporating forms that, while they sometimes evoked natural phenomena (like snail shells, flower petals and insect wings), did not resemble anything in the visible world. Her work, which continued to evolve until her death in 1944, uses geometric patterns and curving, gestural lines to suggest esoteric meanings. Sometimes the images look like maps of a world that exists just past the horizon of rational consciousness.“Beyond the Visible: Hilma af Klint,” a documentary by Halina Dyrschka, provides a thoughtful survey of its subject. It’s enriched by the dazzling charisma of her art and limited by the scarcity of biographical material. The timeline of her life is set forth, and her voice is conjured by passages from her voluminous notebooks, but the fact that she lived and worked so far from the centers of the art world means that some of the usual supporting material in a film like this is lacking. Nobody who remembers her well is still around. There are a handful of photographs of af Klint at various stages of her life, but no moving images, an absence Dyrschka addresses with discreet re-enactments that show af Klint in her studio.The thin background information is a result of the neglect of this prolific and inventive artist for more than a century. “Beyond the Visible” is a chapter in the wholesale revision of the critical and historical record that began only recently, and it enlists a passionate and knowledgeable cadre of curators, scholars, scientists and artists to press the argument for af Klint’s importance. The paintings themselves are the best evidence — even through the mediation of a home screen, their vibrancy, wit and formal command is thrilling — but the intellectual and cultural context is fascinating too.The experts link af Klint’s explorations with contemporary scientific discoveries, like radio waves and the X-ray, that pointed toward the unseen dimensions of reality, and also with the mystical movements of her time. She was drawn to the Theosophy of Helena Blavatsky and to the teachings of the Austrian spiritualist Rudolf Steiner, with whom she corresponded. Her visionary interests, far from suggesting eccentricity, place her squarely in the mainstream of modernism, many of whose exponents in various arts (including Kandinsky) found inspiration in the esoteric.“Beyond the Visible” bristles with the excitement of discovery and also with the impatience that recognition has taken so long. It refreshes the eyes and the mind.Beyond the Visible: Hilma af KlintNot rated. In Swedish, English and German, with subtitles. Running time: 1 hour 34 minutes. Watch on Kino Marquee. More

  • in

    ‘Bad Therapy’ Review: A Twisted Therapist Sinks In Her Hooks

    This is a movie that can shake at least one of your fundamental beliefs to the core. If you consider “God Only Knows” by the Beach Boys a song you could never get tired of, its use over the opening credits — prefaced by that Frank Lloyd Wright quote about how if you tip the world over, everything loose would land in Los Angeles — might refute that. The song’s dulcet tones float over drone shots and other well-composed ground-level establishing views of middle-class L.A. There’s an instant “oh, this again?” feel to it.“Bad Therapy,” directed by William Teitler from a script by Nancy Doyne, who also wrote the novel on which it’s based, then moves ahead into a tepid domestic comedy-drama and winds up as a tepid thriller.[embedded content]Rob Corddry and Alicia Silverstone play Bob and Susan, a couple suffering from the anomie that afflicts adults whose income level used to afford them a lot more affluence and status. Bob, an arguably underpaid cable television executive, is first seen slouched before the dining room table possibly ogling his 12-year-old stepdaughter, while Susan, a dissatisfied real-estate agent, darts about the kitchen, stressed about her day’s appointments.Both elated and deflated by the news that a friend’s expecting triplets, Susan initiates a marriage-counseling session with a therapist, Judy Small (Michaela Watkins). Couples therapy becomes family therapy, then Judy starts seeing Bob and Susan separately — and giving them dangerously contradictory advice.Judy, as it happens, is a rogue doctor. A former colleague (David Paymer) seeks her out to try to stop her narcissism-fueled manipulations, but Judy’s got her hooks in. Judy baits Susan with questions like, “Are you not aware that your husband is an exceedingly attractive man?” Bob, emboldened by Judy, engages in productive flirtation with a very game colleague, played by the former Dallas Cowboy cheerleader Sarah Shahi. Corddry has never had it so good in a movie as he does here.As the picture winds down into an extremely (not to put too fine a point on it) plain variation on “Fatal Attraction,” one’s inclination to question its implausibility diminishes as well. The movie’s technical competence — very few low-to-mid-budget indie productions boast so many immaculately lit shots — is commendable. But it also has the probably unwanted effect of preparing the viewer for the inevitable tidiness of the narrative’s conclusion. “Bad Therapy” is the cinematic equivalent of lukewarm water.Bad TherapyNot rated. Running time: 1 hour 37 minutes. Rent or buy on Amazon, Google Play, iTunes, and other streaming platforms and pay TV operators. More

  • in

    ‘Endings, Beginnings’ Review: Choose Me

    Watching Shailene Woodley dither between two preposterously hot men — and steamily sample both — in “Endings, Beginnings” might not be the best choice for viewers whose libidos are on mandatory lockdown.If, however, you’re into self-torture, then meet Daphne (Woodley), in her 30s and on an emotional and physical time out. Having abruptly left her job and her longtime partner for ill-defined reasons, Daphne washes up in the pool house of her married half sister, Billie (Lindsay Sloane). When not lackadaisically searching for a job, preferably at an arts-related nonprofit, Daphne wafts around in boho wear, looking gorgeously pensive and smoking like a fiend. She has temporarily quit drinking: Apparently, as flashbacks suggest, her previously profligate lifestyle was something less than fun.[embedded content]Not to worry, though, because all of her self-imposed sabbaticals will end as soon as her gold lamé frock catches the eye of Frank (Sebastian Stan) at a party. A stubbly brooder and walking red flag, Frank specializes in lustful glances and angsty conversations. Add some flirty text messages and a playlist coyly titled “Music To Suffer To” and Daphne is happily leaping off the celibacy wagon. In more than one direction, as it happens: There’s also Opposite Frank, otherwise known as his best friend, Jack, a successful Irish writer played by Jamie Dornan. Anyone still in doubt about where Daphne’s heart should land needs to carefully reread the final clause of the previous sentence.While Daphne teeters listlessly between security and passion, earnest lovemaking versus rip-them-off boinking, “Endings, Beginnings” grows marginally more substantive. Emotional and familial blanks are vaguely filled in (the script — by Jardine Libaire and the director, Drake Doremus — is partly improvised by the actors), but the movie delivers mood more successfully than information. The soundtrack is soothing, the photography (by the gifted Marianne Bakke) is soft and hazy, and the tone is pleasingly contemplative. The writing might be a tangle of limp clichés, but the actors — especially Woodley and the terrific Wendie Malick as Daphne’s mother — sweat to sell every line.Similar to Doremus’s 2011 romance, “Like Crazy,” “Endings, Beginnings” noodles around with characters whose personalities and motivations remain frustratingly indistinct. By the end, Daphne’s journey of self-discovery may have pulled you in, but, if you’re anything like me, you’ll still hate her.Endings, BeginningsNot rated. Running time: 1 hour 50 minutes. Rent or buy on Amazon, iTunes, Google Play and other streaming platforms and pay TV operators. More

  • in

    ‘The Quarry’ Review: Traveling With a Guilty Conscience

    In “The Quarry,” Shea Whigham stars as a fugitive wanted for murder and arson who, in a moment of anger, kills the preacher (Bruno Bichir) who picked him up on a West Texas roadside, trying to help. He then buries the body in a quarry and assumes the dead man’s identity, traveling to a tiny town where the reverend was to take charge of a sleepy church.But the movie, directed by Scott Teems and based on a novel by the South African writerDamon Galgut, proceeds to squelch any suspense surrounding the main character’s unmasking with an atmosphere of relentless solemnity. The film plays as if it’s been smothered under a pile of rocks. In a miscalculated performance, Whigham, credited only as The Man, is so reserved, even when responding to simple questions, that it is amazing the townspeople buy him as someone whose job involves speaking publicly.[embedded content]Upon arriving, The Man — who adopts the name of the preacher, David Martin — is put up in a house by Celia (Catalina Sandino Moreno), whose main role in the drama is to sit in dark rooms and ponder her regrets. (A somber, repetitive score by Heather McIntosh adds another layer of gloom.)After his possessions are stolen from a van, The Man files a report with the police chief, John (Michael Shannon), who is in a relationship with Celia and harbors certain racist and reactionary tendencies. These lead him to Celia’s cousins (Bobby Soto and Alvaro Martinez), who did in fact steal his belongings. But the items, unfortunately for them, include some bloody clothes.Posing as a preacher evidently rubs off on the protagonist, who finds that he is capable of captivating his flock and even performing a baptism. He hints that Celia’s cousins ought to be let off the hook.“Forgiveness only works in a world where people learn their lessons,” John says in response. “But they don’t. Not here, anyway.” Chewing on a line like that, Shannon is the only the actor who seems to recognize that this material is more suited to a potboiler than a limp, contrived spiritual parable.The QuarryRated R. Murder and guilt. Running time: 1 hour 38 minutes. Rent or buy on Amazon, FandangoNOW, Google Play, and other streaming platforms and pay TV operators. More