More stories

  • in

    Interview: Matt Steinberg tells us about Outside Edge, a theatre company working with addictions

    Outside Edge has spent the last 20 years as the UK’s only theatre company and participatory arts charity focused on improving the lives of people affected by any form of addiction; both those with addictions and those around them. When we saw an appeal via Crowdfunding, we wanted to find out more and offer our support. And what better way than an interview with Artistic Director, Matt Steinberg.

    What initially brought you to Outside Edge?
    Like many Artistic Directors, I spent the first part of my career as an actor turned freelance director. I’m originally from Canada and when I moved to the UK in 2011 I figured I’d be very fortunate if I managed to eke out a freelance career in a new country. It really never occurred to me that within seven years I’d be an Artistic Director. And Outside Edge isn’t just a theatre company, it’s also a participatory arts charity, so to my great surprise I’m now the CEO of a small social welfare charity with health and wellbeing outcomes; I definitely never expected to find myself doing that sort of job in a totally different sector!
    A few years ago I was at a tricky point in my career. I had directed a couple of successful fringe productions, assisted a bunch of great directors at great theatres and I had a strong professional network, but I couldn’t make the leap from producing on a project-to-project basis to being hired by a theatre company. I was too old or experienced for early-career development schemes and not experienced enough for Associate Director schemes. Basically, I was experiencing what another director referred to as the early-mid-career bottleneck effect where there are too many equally qualified candidates trying to land a very small number of jobs. 
    After a while I became pretty disheartened and wasn’t sure how I fit into the industry. So I applied to the Clore Leadership programme with a pitch that I wanted to drive change in the sector and help artists to develop sustainable careers in the theatre. In my application I said that to do this I MIGHT eventually one day CONSIDER being an Artistic Director. To my surprise the Clore offered me a place on the course. Then shortly after someone suggested that I start to apply for leadership roles, since that’s what I was planning to focus on during my Clore residential. 
    At first I resisted the suggestion, but since it was just meant to be an exercise to help me re-articulate my skills and experience, I thought I’d give it a try. The first Artistic Director job that came up on ArtsJobs was for a small theatre company and participatory arts charity that was focused on addiction, so the rest (as they say) is history.
    All of this occurred within three months of being accepted on the Clore course, which finished the Friday before I was meant to start at Outside Edge. So when I turned up for the two week residential my question was no longer, “Should I possibly consider thinking about becoming an Artistic Director?”, it was now urgently, ‘How the hell do I actually be an Artistic Director?”
    How do the two parts, theatre company and social welfare charity, work together?
    Outside Edge was founded 20 years ago by an actor, playwright and director named Phil Fox, who was also a recovering heroin addict and alcoholic. When Phil was in the midst of active addiction he struggled to maintain his creative practice, but through reengaging with his craft he found that he could support his recovery. He was driven to make work about his lived experience, but he also wanted to share with other people how creativity and drama could help them to remain sober. So from it’s earliest days Outside Edge has been both a producing theatre company and a recovery support service. 
    We still work from this model, whereby we produce new pieces of theatre about issues related to addiction, which may or may not be created by people with lived experience, and we deliver a series of free weekly drama activities for people affected by addiction. For example, last year we co-produced a play about chemsex at the Soho Theatre using a cast and crew of trained professionals, but we also presented a play at the VAULT Festival that was devised and performed by a mixed group of trained professionals and community participants about their lived experience of moving from addiction to recovery. We really don’t hold a distinction between community and professional artists. At the end of the day the audience judges the quality of the work onstage and not a performer or writer’s background or training.
    Now we’re starting to see theatres reopening, what plans have you got for the coming months?
    We’re in the final stages of assessing scripts for the Phil Fox Award for Playwriting, which is our inaugural competition for plays about issues related to addiction. It’s a really thrilling moment for us because we’re meeting so many new playwrights and building relationships that will help us generate new work over the coming years. 

    In the short-term, we’re focusing more on growing our participatory arts offer. We’ve had a 40% increase in need since the start of lockdown for our arts-based recovery maintenance activities and we don’t anticipate this will decrease any time soon. We’ve gone from delivering 5 weekly groups (and a Drama Taster Session project in treatment facilities) before lockdown to 9 weekly groups over the course of this year. We’ve just expanded our activity offer from West London into South London and we’re about to partner on a dance/creative movement group with the incredible Fallen Angels Dance Theatre who also work with people affected by addiction. So we are busier than ever before, but any work we present on stage over the coming months will be created by people with lived experience of addiction while we build our pipeline of new work as a producing theatre company.
    How have you coped with an increase in people approaching you for help?
    The average number of people attending each of our sessions has increased by almost half since the start of lockdown. Considering that we’ve practically doubled the number of weekly sessions we offer shows just how much people need a stable, consistent recovery maintenance activity during this challenging period of time. One of our participants told us after one of our drama sessions that he was, “grateful for this safe space. It’s keeping me sane. It’s keeping me alive.” So we knew almost immediately that for some of our most socially isolated participants we would become an important lifeline for the foreseeable future.
    We’ve always offered pastoral care in addition to our creative activities, but we never expected this part of our work to become as central as it has been during the Covid-19 crisis. Many of the people we support are incredibly vulnerable and have a range of very complex needs. From the start of the pandemic we had to refocus a lot of our resources on making sure people were safe, had enough food to eat and were able to connect with services in the local community, including their recovery support network. We discovered very quickly that a lot of our beneficiaries were digitally excluded or had poor digital skills, so a significant amount of work over the past six months has been around getting people online and fundraising to keep people connected. This was urgently necessary because, like most other organisations, we moved all of our activities on to Zoom in the space of two weeks.
    Because of this increase in demand for one-to-one support, we’ve had to hire another staff member to help us continue to operate smoothly. We’ve also become much more sophisticated with how we use volunteers. In many respects Covid-19 accelerated plans we had for expanding our participatory arts and pastoral care offer, we just didn’t expect it to happen quite so quickly!
    You’re currently crowdfunding, with a target of £2,500, is this funding for a specific project?
    Our current campaign is to help us cover some of the unexpected costs associated with this increase in need we’ve seen due to Covid-19. As social distancing measures continue, and with the possibility of stricter lockdown rules on the horizon, we’re especially focused on continuing to make sure our activities remain accessible for as many people as possible. This means that we need to be ready to supply more digitally excluded people with technology, mobile data plans and other types of support to make sure that they can remain connected to our activities and their wider support networks.

    There has been plenty of talk recently about how the arts need to rethink how they work in and with the local community, what could they learn from Outside Edge?
    Everything we do at Outside Edge is done WITH our beneficiaries. This means that the people accessing our activities play an active role in designing our offer. For example, we undertook a consultation process at the very start of lockdown with our participants about what they wanted from us and what they needed to feel safe. The feedback and suggestions we received allowed us to work in partnership with them to meet the needs of the community and to design new activities that were actually effective in addressing their needs. This produced a weekly Theatre Club that allows participants the chance to socialise online to discuss a streamed production (with amazing Q&A guests such as Michelle Terry, Roger Allam and Rupert Goold!), a Peer-led Check-in every week where they can support each other in their recoveries and a group that will get people physically moving through dance/creative movement. We would never have come up with these ideas without an in-depth consultation process and by creating space for the beneficiaries to speak with each other and with our staff. The result is that together we were able to come up with some wonderfully creative and very innovative solutions!
    I should say that one of the challenges we face is that it’s very difficult to co-produce arts activities with our community because many of them don’t come from a background where they were exposed to different forms of art, let alone different types of theatre. When we recruit people from drug and alcohol treatment facilities we usually find that about 50% will tell us that our Drama Taster Sessions are their first time participating or engaging in drama or theatre. Over the past couple of years we’ve started to arrange lots of free Theatre Trips for our participants to attend a broad range of productions so that they have a wider vocabulary to use when we ask them what they would like us to offer. This has led to some really unexpected projects, such as a module in Acting Through Song that we designed with them following a Theatre Trip to see a musical at LAMDA. 
    And is there anything you’d like to see Outside Edge do that right now just isn’t possible, maybe because of time/ resources? 
    Outside Edge is experiencing a really thrilling period of growth and, as a very small organisation, we’re all enjoying the challenges associated with punching above our weight. With the Phil Fox Award for Playwriting it feels like the first time we’ll be in a position to identify a pool of plays that we want to develop and build seasons around. As an Artistic Director this opportunity to discover new stories, build interesting creative teams and develop new audiences is a dream come true. 
    In terms of our participatory arts offer, we really want to continue to build on the incredible ideas that have come out of lockdown and maintain all of our new groups. Thanks to our online offer we’ve enjoyed meeting more participants from outside of London (and even outside of the UK) and we’d love to do more work across the country so that access to our activities isn’t based on a postcode lottery.
    There must be so many great success stories, is there any in particular that you think epitomises just what Outside Edge is all about?
    One example of Outside Edge’s ability to nurture new talent is a vivid story from eight years ago when we toured a production to a drug and alcohol treatment centre. The play presented was about a mother whose children were being taken away from her due to her addiction. In the final moments of the production, a client named Sonya Hale who had been in and out of the criminal justice system her entire adult life stood up and said, “That’s me! That’s my life!!” Sonya had not encountered theatre before, but once she left treatment she started attending our drama workshops, performed in our productions and eventually began to write plays for us.  Eight years later Sonya is sober, her son has been returned to her and she is now an acclaimed playwright whose plays have been performed at The Southbank Centre, The Big House, Latitude Festival and East15 University. Rehearsed readings of her first play Glory Whispers were performed at Theatre503 after winning Synergy Theatre Project’s national prison scriptwriting competition. Her monologue play Dean McBride was a finalist in the inaugural Heretic Voices competition, and was performed at the Arcola Theatre. Sonya’s story has been featured in the Evening Standard and she received a Jerwood Arts commission from Clean Break Theatre Company and HighTide Theatre Festival. Sonya is also an Outside Edge Theatre Company Associate Theatre Facilitator and leads our writers group. She said of her time as a participant, “Outside Edge, more than anything, has given me the greatest gift ever. Belief. Belief in myself and in the wonder of life itself.”
    Finally, what would you say with someone with an addiction, or those close to them, who think theatre just isn’t for them?
    They should just listen to one of our participants who is in recovery themselves: “Definitely go for it! It can be daunting to let your guard down and be silly, I found it difficult too, but as a result of stepping out of my comfort zone I’ve gained so much.”

    Our thanks and appreciate to Matt for taking time out of what is clearly a busy time for Outside Edge to talk to us. An organsation that we believe deserves as much attention as possible. More

  • in

    ‘Faith Healer’ Review: Michael Sheen Stirs the Embers in the Ashes

    The first time I ever saw Michael Sheen, he was blazing like the sun. He was 30 then, making his Broadway debut as a divinely inspired, impishly behaved Mozart in the 1999 revival of Peter Shaffer’s “Amadeus.” He gave such undiluted radiance to a young composer’s brilliance that he eclipsed everyone else onstage, and it felt almost dangerous to stare at him for too long.Two decades later — on Saturday, in fact — I watched a 51-year-old Sheen portraying another artist, an older man raking through the ashes of a career that had burned only fitfully. As Frank Hardy, the title character of Brian Friel’s “Faith Healer,” which was streamed live from the Old Vic Theater in London, Sheen became a walking shadow, a figure whose doubts had long ago overwhelmed his gift, the dubious but occasionally transcendent art of healing the sick and the maimed by faith alone. (And make no mistake: Friel is discussing the role of the artist here.)But as the camera stared at Sheen, strutting and slinking across an empty stage before an audience of no one, you could sense the sparks in the embers. Frank is an Irish-born traveling seller of hope and a man whose talents are, to put it kindly, capricious.Sheen drew Frank in lines of darkness that never entirely hid the light that still flickered disturbingly within. And an actor I had first valued for his incandescence was now working in subtle, murky shades that paradoxically illuminated one of the greatest plays ever written about the benediction and curse of the artist’s gift.One of the great rewards of having been a theater critic for as long as I have is the privilege of seeing actors and plays change colors, shape and substance over the years. Sometimes, there is shrinkage. If “Faith Healer” — four monologues for three actors first staged in 1979 (with James Mason!) — tells us anything, it’s that greatness is never fixed.Then there are those wondrous occasions when a performance startlingly shifts your perspective on a work you thought you knew well. A new, beckoning landscape opens up, there to tell you what you hadn’t figured out before and suggesting, with audacious hope, that this old and familiar play still teems with unexplored and mysterious life.That’s what happened to me watching Sheen in Matthew Warchus’s enthralling production of “Faith Healer,” which ended its brief run on Saturday as part of the Old Vic: In Camera series of live performances, staged (to an empty house). I first saw “Faith Healer” in 1994, during my first year as a New York Times daily reviewer, a job I am leaving next month.In that version, directed by Joe Dowling at the Long Wharf Theater in New Haven, Conn., Frank was played by the great Irish actor Donal McCann. McCann embodied Frank as a living dead man, trapped in an eternal fugue of reflection and regret. It’s a performance that still haunts my dreams, and it gave an otherworldly, fablelike shimmer to this account of a man who, on rare occasion, genuinely seemed to work miracles as he traveled rural Scotland and Wales in the company of his wife, Grace, and manager, Teddy.The next time Frank showed up in my life, in 2006, he looked much more glamorous. That’s because he was being incarnated by Ralph Fiennes on Broadway, in a performance that homed in on the character’s contemptuous narcissism. It was a stinging, brooding performance that captured the destructiveness of an artist’s self-absorption, and it too has lingered in my recollection.Now my memory must also make room for Sheen’s Frank, an interpretation that grounds the character in a grimy reality in ways I hadn’t thought possible. First seen weaving through a row of empty chairs, booming out the names of Welsh towns he visited on his healing tours, he exudes the stale aroma of an old-time vaudevillian’s greasepaint.A barrel-shaped figure in a much-worn black suit, overcoat and fedora, his face half-covered by a grizzled beard, he would appear to be a posturing mediocrity, a mountebank with a smooth line in Irish gab. Then the camera moves in on his face, and you see something unspeakable in the eyes — fathomless pain and self-loathing and, yes, a glint of the ineffable, of genius, perhaps, that this shabby, middle-aged man can’t begin to make sense of.Frank has the first and last monologues of “Faith Healer.” And the presence established by Sheen in the opening scene justifies the accounts of the two other characters in the play. That’s Grace (a superb Indira Varma, as a woman turned into an unstanched wound by a lacerating love) and Teddy (a cozily louche David Threlfall).Not that the details match up in these characters’ anguished, faltering recollections of the bleak life they shared on the road, and its horrible and somehow inevitable conclusion. On the contrary, facts both trivial (who chose the music for Frank’s performances) and monumental (births, deaths) tend to change according to who’s telling the story.But still, the sometimes sadistic but irresistible man Grace could never leave was palpably there in Sheen’s initial portrait. So was the none-too-bright, rather ordinary fellow described by Teddy, the Frank who turned into a figure of magnificence on those rare, outrageous occasions when he became what his advertisements said he was. And you understood why these three people, who were destined to wreck one another’s lives (and knew it), nonetheless had to stay together.As is the custom of Old Vic: In Camera (whose earlier, starry offering have included Duncan Macmillan’s “Lungs,” with Claire Foy and Matt Smith and Stephen Beresford’s “Three Kings,” with Andrew Scott), there is very little scenery, but then there has never been with “Faith Healer.”It takes place in the endless and open darkness of recollection, where the events and faces and words of another time keep changing shape. (The lighting, by Tim Lutkin and Sarah Brown, summons that dark realm beautifully.) In a way, it’s about how every one of us is an artist by default, reinventing the world each time we remember something.If I saw a recording of this production at some point in the future, I think I’d discover it wasn’t quite the way I’ve described it here, after all. The singular blessing of live theater, which I have so cherished during my 27 years at The Times, is that it insists you learn to live with the memories of it, which are as mutable, perplexing and endlessly revealing as life itself.Faith HealerPerformed Sept. 16-19; oldvictheatre.com More

  • in

    ‘Zero Cost House’ Review: Could Thoreau Save Us Now?

    For an enduring figure in the American canon, Henry David Thoreau is needier than you might think. When this relic of the 1800s shows up in Toshiki Okada’s probing, funny, hugely resonant play “Zero Cost House,” he is insecure about his 21st-century status. It’s pretty clear he’s been keeping close tabs.“Do you Google yourself, Mr. Thoreau?” the playwright asks — because this is the kind of show where the author is a character (well, two characters; more on that in a moment), communing with the past.“Sure, every day,” Thoreau answers. So he knows that his readership is down.Okada himself, as a young writer in Tokyo, was a fervent “Walden” devotee, and convinced that he always would be. By his late 30s, though, he has become an internationally lauded experimental playwright, but also a guy who considers Thoreau’s treatise on simple living naïve.In “Zero Cost House” — written for the Philadelphia-based Pig Iron Theater Company, which first staged it in 2012 and has reconfigured it superbly for Zoom — those two versions of Okada (played by an assortment of actors) butt up against each other, albeit gently. Plush rabbit puppets and a charismatic architect-philosopher are along for the ride, with Björk on the soundtrack and cast members trading off characters almost relay-style.To step into an Okada play is to enter a dreamscape, and that’s true of this fractured stage memoir, too. Then dream morphs into nightmare. The earthquake that struck Japan in March 2011, setting off a tsunami and a nuclear disaster at a power station in Fukushima, becomes the catalyst for Okada’s reconnection with “Walden” and a more radical way of life.What gives this live-streamed “Zero Cost House” particular potency right now is the wide variety of lenses we have through which to view it — the assorted calamities jolting people into working for social change or into altering their comfortable lives in drastic, once unthinkable ways.Yet this play is not a dour exercise. Translated into comfortably colloquial American English by the Okada veteran Aya Ogawa, it has a friendliness that makes it approachable.Directed and adapted by Pig Iron’s co-artistic director Dan Rothenberg — whose previous Okada productions include the achingly atmospheric post-earthquake meditation “Time’s Journey Through a Room” and the more comically contemplative “The Sonic Life of a Giant Tortoise” — “Zero Cost House” encourages us to seize the opportunity of disaster: to be brave enough to live more meaningfully, to construct a better world.By re-engaging this deeply with the text, making it work so beautifully online, the artists behind this production — including a uniformly excellent cast and a pair of designers, Maiko Matsushima (visual) and Rucyl Frison (sound) — are themselves responding to a crisis.In the play, Thoreau mentions a moment in “Walden” when he meets a couple who “seemed to be in dire straits, and what was worse, they had no awareness of how their circumstances had gotten that way in the first place.”Amid our own dire straits, Okada prods us to consider how we got here — and what we urgently need to change to save ourselves.Zero Cost HouseFinal performance Sept. 25 via Zoom; pigiron.org More

  • in

    ‘Static Apnea’ Review: Breathing Together, Remaining Apart

    In the early days of the pandemic, when someone passed too close to me on the street or in the grocery store, I held my breath.I thought of that first.Just a few weeks earlier, on a night of wine-drinking and chatting, one of my semiregular panic attacks seized me; I doubled over in the bathroom, heaving and clutching my chest while a friend coached me through inhales and exhales.I thought of that second: the fear that confronts me in those moments I seem to forget the most basic function of my body.These are the scenes that played in my mind at “Static Apnea” a short but frightening performance installation that immerses you in the sensation of suffocating underwater — but could just as easily go a few toes further into the deep.Conceived and directed by Christopher McElroen, who wrote the script with Julia Watt, “Static Apnea” is fascinating to behold even before you set foot in the space: A 40-foot-long storage container in Carroll Gardens, in a narrow lot next to an Eileen Fisher, is home to the piece, which is presented by the American Vicarious and the Invisible Dog Art Center.The pitch-black interior feels like a perverse fun house: You navigate through a narrow, winding path with mirrors on each side until a walkway appears. (Troy Hourie did the daunting design.) The walls to your left and right glow a rich cobalt (the vivid lighting is by Zach Weeks), and, later, other piercing shades, that give the unnerving sense of being surrounded — trapped, even — by water.And of course that’s the point. At the end of the walkway, behind a pane of glass, an actress appears (in my performance, Isabella Pinheiro; in others, Jenny Tibbels) to speak, in a series of lyrical fragments, about static apnea, the practice of holding one’s breath underwater for as long as possible.The record for a woman: 9 minutes and 2 seconds.Fittingly, the performance is short enough to fit in that very same pocket of breath. Pinheiro urges you to breathe with her and hold your breath with her. She cascades through a number of questions: “What does blue feel like? Can you breathe it in?” Then later, “Do you know what failure depth means?” Her voice seems to echo in the space (Andy Evan Cohen did the stellar sound design), and though her questions prod, her voice is affectless and gently mesmerizing.First presented in 2017, “Static Apnea” stands on its own, but is now saddled with implications that it doesn’t directly engage: an illness that ravages the respiratory system; a Black man who, while pinned under a police officer, declared that he couldn’t breathe.In a production that emphasizes the intimacy of one-on-one interaction between viewer and actor, it adheres too stringently to its stylistic austerity. Though this was the closest I’ve been to a performer in months, with just a pane of glass between us, Pinheiro felt more distant than ever.The script, full of elegant queries, is over so soon, offering just a taste of what a more penetrating version would look like: What actually happens during the process of drowning? What does that feel like?In her stunning poem “The Five Stages of Drowning,” Patricia Smith slowly details each of those steps, taken from the true story of a child tossed into the water. “The startled river opens, then closes over her, the way a new mother would,” she writes.“Static Apnea” had me holding my breath, but was just shy of breathtaking.Static ApneaThrough Oct. 17 at the Invisible Dog Art Center, Brooklyn; theinvisibledog.org More

  • in

    New York City Center to Revive a Pair of Musicals About Black Lives

    Broadway shows may be off the table until at least January, but when shows do resume, New York City Center is giving two musicals that focus on people of color, but were never revived on the city’s biggest stages, another shot.The new Encores! season, announced Friday, includes “The Life,” a gritty musical about the hustlers and prostitutes who inhabited Times Square in the early 1980s, and “The Tap Dance Kid,” about an aspiring 10-year-old dancer whose dreams are scorned by his hard-driving lawyer father.No dates have yet been set, but the theater says it plans to stage the shows in person once it determines it is safe to do so. While Encores! began in 1994 with concert-style presentations, its shows have gotten more elaborate over time, and it has moved from Golden Age musicals to more recent shows that have never gotten full-fledged New York revivals.“The Life” (1997) — with a book by David Newman, Ira Gasman and Cy Coleman — will be directed by the Tony Award-winning actor Billy Porter and offers an updated take on the story of a young Black prostitute, Queen, and those who walk the streets with her as they work toward a better life in crime-ridden New York City. Both Chuck Cooper and Lillias White won Tonys for their roles in the original production.“The Tap Dance Kid” (1983) — with a book by Charles Blackwell and lyrics by Robert Lorick — will be directed by another Tony winner, Kenny Leon. It follows a Black boy from an upper-middle-class family as he nurses a dream of becoming a tap dancer, against his father’s wishes. The musical is based on the 1974 novel “Nobody’s Family is Going to Change” by Louise Fitzhugh.The third musical, to be announced at a later date, will begin a tradition of including a classic title in a series that typically revives hidden gems.This season will be the first under Lear deBessonet, the new Encores! artistic director. Clint Ramos, the first person of color to win a Tony Award for costume design of a play for his work on “Eclipsed,” in 2016, will also take on the newly created role of Encores! producing creative director.The center also announced a five-part documentary series, “Encores! Inside the Revival,” which will debut Oct. 14. The 10-minute episodes, which will be available for free on City Center’s YouTube channel and website, will offer a behind-the-scenes look at the three productions in development.Two episodes will also focus on shows that were canceled this spring because of the coronavirus pandemic: “Love Life” (1948), which had been set to star Kate Baldwin and Brian Stokes Mitchell in March, and “Thoroughly Modern Millie” (2002), which would have put Ashley Park in the flapper dress in May. An Encores! spokesman said those productions were still possible for future seasons. More

  • in

    Interview: How Keeley Lane zoomed to the top of the beanstalk.

    With many families stuck at home with children during this summer’s lockdown, Zoom has offered some incredible ways for them to come together in a creative environment. Always keen to learn about new ways to present a show, we turned to Buglight Theatre’s Keeley Lane, whose Zoom production of Jack in the Beanstalk has been a big hit with families.
    Was Zoom always your preference for producing an online show?
    Zoom was the perfect platform as it truly allows for interactivity. If there wasn’t the capability for the audience to impact the piece then I wasn’t interested in making it at all. I personally would rather watch a good series or film than streamed theatre, so this needed to offer something different. And panto fitted well as it’s the perfect genre for interactivity.
    Did you find the Zoom features liberating?
    I’d never done a panto or family theatre before so it was all brand new. I’m not sure without the constraints of lockdown I would have ever developed and directed a panto, but it was a really fun, creative challenge.  It was liberating in some ways to be theatrical, and not to create a ‘shit’ film. We needed to remember constantly that this is theatre and play with its conventions, e.g. having the beanstalk as a real vegetable growing in front of Ms Pinch’s imaginary window.  
    Was it difficult to avoid compromising visual quality when working remotely? 
    We had to embrace the constraints of the visual quality: we had fab costume etc but not the budget to have our backgrounds all designed. But for the future, with a bigger budget I’d love to have a visual designer on board to create our virtual videos and backgrounds. I think with this though you forgive that it’s not perfect – it’s live theatre on Zoom and everything could go wrong, so that’s really exciting to be part of.  
    Tell us a bit about the audience interaction, and what considerations you have to make regarding that? 
    The interaction was crucial to the piece for me. I wanted the audience to feel active, not passive, so the interactions needed to feel imperative; for example, giving us magic words to help the beanstalk grow or helping Ms Pinch tell Jack & Dazey they had to get jobs.
    The fact we could spotlight people at any time I think meant the audience wanted to be more active and dance away at home so that we might select them. We had a system for letting people in to the show and were careful who we spotlit on Zoom. The host can hide anyone’s video at any time or throw them out, so it’s relatively manageable. 
    Is it difficult for actors to adapt to the small screen rather than a live stage? 
    Yes, a lot of what you have to play with is eye line and perspective to try and make it look like the actors are in the same room or place. If we had had longer I would have developed this further. We found that the further away from screen the characters were we lost connection with them, hence a lot of big faces in the screen. We pushed this a lot, playing with them really close up to camera as it’s the only thing we had much leeway with really: we didn’t have the luxury of space and depth as you would on stage. Interacting with the backgrounds and having something in front of you, such as Ms Pinch’s iron and window, allowed us to place them in the space. This is something that with more time and money I’d want to explore further. 
    [embedded content]
    The performances still needed the same energy as the big stage and so it meant the actors were occasionally projecting where we didn’t need to. It’s a hard line between having a lack of energy and too much on these little screens. We kept re-iterating we wanted big panto performances to get those expressive faces but maybe didn’t bring the vocal down as much as we could have at certain moments.
    What has the audience response been regarding paying for online content? 
    The reaction was brilliant – we even had a few viewers saying they were happy to donate a little more because there were five in their party. I think people appreciated the fact we were valuing our artists and paying them, so were happy to pay the price for that. There is a lot of free online content available, which is fantastic, but I worry it will devalue what we are all doing. 
    Do you feel online productions can offer a successful alternative revenue stream, or is it just a necessity in the current climate? 
    I don’t think these shows offer a great alternative financially. I do however think that regardless of whether lockdown continues or not they should be available to people. Lockdown has really highlighted how isolated a lot of people already were.
    When I did the Big Telly show on Zoom, in the Q&A afterwards there was a lady from NYC who is severely disabled and can’t leave her house easily. She said it was the first live show and audience she had been a part of in a long time. Seeing and participating in the audience was so special to her. She urged this work should continue.
    Another lady with autistic children expressed that while relaxed performances are good in venues this was a revelation, as her kids could scream and shout at home without bothering anyone and there wasn’t the usual bother of getting to the theatre. So I do think this sort of work offers an alternative accessibility package to venues and audiences.   
    Having created an entire family show in Zoom what’s next for you?   
    If panto can’t happen this Christmas we hope that a venue will pick up Jack & The Beanstalk for us to offer it to audiences far and wide with a bit more of a budget behind it.    
    We’re also developing a family show called Glow – hopefully in venues, but we will have a Zoom alternative as well. It’s about Gwen the Glow worm who has lost her glow, and the audience will help her to find it. It’s an introduction to mental health and resilience for young children. We just need the funding to make this happen.
    Glow was actually set to be our first family show before lockdown happened so we’d love to progress this. With Glow I think there will be puppetry classes, but we are developing it for both online and in person. 
    We’re also working on how to grow as a company and maybe go for NPO status next time round, so lots of work to do as an organisation. 
    The company I worked with on my first zoom show, Big Telly, are fantastic and are really pushing the boundaries with all of this. They are working with a gaming company to bring us Alice in Wonderland on Zoom. It’s set in a theme park: I cannot wait to see what magic they have for us. The danger with these Zoom shows is they get a bit samey, but I know with them they will really push forward to realise the next new thing!  

    As always, our thanks to Keeley for taking time out to chat with us. With panto season looking less likely as we approach the end of the year, we do hope Jack and the Beanstalk will available again for families to enjoy. More

  • in

    Review: ‘In Love and Warcraft’ Serves Romance for Noobs

    Thirty-seven years ago, a wise woman with teased hair and a leopard-print skirt told us that love is a battlefield. Pat Benatar wasn’t talking about the battlefields of Azeroth, the world of the popular online role-playing game “World of Warcraft,” but surely warring mages and paladins, too, may fall victim to the affairs of the heart?The answer is yes — at least according to the dated clichés and gender politics in “In Love and Warcraft,” presented via Zoom by the American Conservatory Theater and Perseverance Theater. The play, written by Madhuri Shekar and directed by Peter J. Kuo, follows a young woman who is an avid player of the fantasy game and struggles with intimacy in our age of ubiquitous screens. Though it premiered onstage in 2014, the play could have been a timely comedy for our isolated times, and yet the antiquated writing and stumbling execution never measure up.“In Love and Warcraft” covers familiar rom-com territory: Take “The Big Bang Theory,” with its nerdy socially awkward protagonists and the problematic pro-incel depictions of relationships, and you already have the spirit. College senior Evie (Cassandra Hunter), a gamer with an online boyfriend she’s never met in real life, is inexperienced when it comes to sex and dating, yet she has a Cyrano de Bergerac-esque side hustle ghostwriting love letters for sweethearts unable to put words to their affections. But when she falls for a client, Raul (Hernán Angulo), she’s forced to confront her own hangups about dating IRL.Let me make a proposition here and now: Death to the virginal nerd trope. Or, at the very least, let’s make it a little more interesting.Evie has a unique philosophy of love. She approaches relationships like she approaches gaming — a series of strategies and maneuvers to get the intended result. But the character is little more than a 2-D rendering. Even when the play graduates her naïveté and first-time sex jitters into a psychological inhibition, it spends too long spinning its wheels about the source of her romantic discomfort (Is she asexual? Is she gay? Has she been a victim of assault? Has she had some other traumatic experience?) before ultimately shrugging it off.But Evie is not the only issue. Her oversexed roommate, Kitty (Evangeline Edwards), spends all her time pursing her lips, primping her hair and adjusting her breasts: She is the whore to Evie’s Madonna, because this play falls into the trap of reductive gender binaries. And the men, of course, are mostly horny teenage sex beasts, except for Evie’s game-addicted online boyfriend, Ryan (James Mercer), who kicks her out of their online guild after they break up.The rest of the cast (Wesley Guimarães and Madeline Isabel Yagle) struggle to draw substance from the other characters, too — largely pointless fluff figures, like a sassy gay hairdresser with bloody sex tales and a fake Hispanic accent. The actors — all members of ACT’s MFA class — are earnest, but their performances lack chemistry and depth. And Kuo’s sluggish direction, alongside the superfluities of Shekar’s script and the cast’s aerobic attempts to breathe life into inconsequential characters and static scenes, makes the two-hour show feel interminable.There’s also the matter of the technology: The production often tries to present the illusion of characters being in the same room, but the screens are often misaligned, so the characters aren’t always on the same plane or even facing the right direction. And for a show that draws on the world of gaming, there’s little incorporation of gameplay until a final scene, when an extended sequence throws us into Azeroth but then leaves us there for too long.There’s more than enough material here for an innovative production — one about alternative ways people choose to connect outside of traditional, heteronormative models; one that has more fun with the theme of online gaming and draws more affectionately from the unique relationships and communities people build through them; or one that takes into account more generally the way so many of our social interactions are built around technology.For all the magic and adventure promised by the game central to its premise, “In Love and Warcraft” fails to take things to the next level.In Love and WarcraftAvailable on demand through Sept. 25; act-sf.org More

  • in

    Review: Tales of Brutality From ‘Twelve Angry Men … and Women’

    The instant the string quartet finished, the police car was there: red and blue lights flashing, siren screaming as it approached.On Saturday evening in Bedford-Stuyvesant, Brooklyn, a masked crowd had gathered to watch a live performance being filmed on the Black Lives Matter mural that stretches down the center of Fulton Street — the Billie Holiday Theater’s powerful reading of “12 Angry Men … and Women: The Weight of the Wait,” a documentary collage of monologues about harassment, intimidation and violence by police against Black people who are simply going about their business.The music, played by members of the New York Philharmonic, had been the overture, but now came this, a sudden shattering of the peace, intrusive and unnerving. When the car stopped, we could see it at close range through the set, a row of five booths lined up like solo stages for the cast, each with three plexiglass sides and an upstage scrim.The vehicle’s strobes stayed on, and so did its headlights, silhouetting the four actors and one violinist (the excellent Daniel Bernard Roumain) as they took their places. OK, then — it was definitely part of the show, the first Actors’ Equity-approved production to take place in pandemic New York City. Its extraordinary, socially distanced design (particularly notable: Devin Cameron Jewett’s lighting and projections) took full visual and emotional advantage of the location.That’s palpable in the sleek, five-camera YouTube video of the one-night-only show, directed by Indira Etwaroo, the Billie Holiday’s artistic director, and available to watch through Election Day. Right in front of the actors, bold letters on the asphalt spell out TAMIR RICE. The 12-year-old killed by Cleveland police is one of 159 people memorialized by the mural. This is the ground on which the show stands, the platform for what are, in essence, testimonies.“I set out with my two sons,” a 19th-century man named Stephen Pembroke (Wendell Pierce) says in what becomes the play’s refrain, an affirmation of how bone-deep in our nation this ugliness goes. “We walked all night and got as far as New York City, where we were violently arrested and secured.”They were trying to escape slavery. In this script, arranged by Arthur Yorinks, the other voices are contemporary, and most are adapted from “12 Angry Men: True Stories of Being a Black Man in America Today,” a 2011 book by Gregory S. Parks and Matthew W. Hughey. An exception is the final story, a duologue about Breonna Taylor, the emergency room technician shot to death by Louisville, Ky., police six months ago.In the other stories, no one dies; they suffer physical and psychic violence and live to tell the tale.There is Solomon Moore (Billy Eugene Jones), a New York Times journalist who is arrested as he reports on antigang law enforcement. (“Police,” he says wryly, “have great difficulty determining who is, and who is not, a gangster — especially Black gangsters.”)There is Devon Carbado (Lisa Arrindell), the immigrant whose American rite of passage is being “spread-eagled” and searched without cause.There is Alex Landau (Marsha Stephanie Blake), pulled over for an illegal turn, who hears an officer say, ​“If he doesn’t calm down, we’re going to have to shoot him.”These are stories of needless aggression, of traumatic indignities that didn’t have to be. And in watching Pierce play Breonna Taylor’s fiancé, nearly 30 years his junior, there is a reminder that the horror of that night and her loss will be with that young man forever.The Billie Holiday first staged this “12 Angry Men” five years ago, with an all-male cast. Its updated revival now is a bold and vital response to an emergency in progress — and to the infuriating question: Who do you call for help when the people meant to help are the ones who are hurting you?12 Angry Men … and Women: The Weight of the WaitThrough Nov. 3; youtu.be/lM6rMoSUJYQ. Running time: 1 hour 46 minutes. More