Huston, Anjelica

Subterms

    Latest story

    88 Shares36 Views

    In ‘Towards Zero,’ Agatha Christie Gets Steamy

    by

    A new three-part TV mini-series streaming on BritBox amps up the themes of forbidden desire and psychological distress in the detective novelist’s 1944 book.In the second episode of the BBC’s latest Agatha Christie adaptation, a bride walks into the hall of a large country house and finds her husband standing on the elegant curved staircase, with his head buried beneath the silk evening gown his ex-wife is wearing.This, it is clear, is not a stereotypically cozy Christie retelling.Instead, this three-part limited series, “Towards Zero” — which comes to BritBox on Wednesday — takes the forbidden desire, well-heeled nihilism and murderous emotion from Christie’s 1944 novel of the same name and gives those a distinctly contemporary feel.“It’s incredibly dark, interesting material,” said Sam Yates, the show’s director. Since Christie’s novels have already been adapted so many times, “the choice is do them exactly by the book every time, or let them live for the moment,” said Yates, who also directed “Vanya,” the inventive one-man Chekhov adaptation currently playing Off Broadway and starring Andrew Scott.The show features a love triangle between Audrey, played by Ella Lily Hyland, center; and Nevile and Mimi.James Pardon/Mammoth ScreenFor “Towards Zero,” Yates and the writer Rachel Bennette chose the moment, tweaking their source material for today’s audience, as shown by the steamy interaction on the staircase, which pushes the characters to violent extremes.Set in 1936 among the British upper class, “Towards Zero” opens with a love triangle playing out around a much-publicized divorce. Nevile Strange (Oliver Jackson-Cohen), a playboy tennis star, is ending his marriage to Audrey (Ella Lily Hyland), on whom he cheated with the younger and more assertive Kay (Mimi Keene), who would become his wife.We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More

    More stories

    • 125 Shares99 Views

      in Movies

      “The Royal Tenenbaums” Introduced Gene Hackman to a New Generation

      by

      His performance in Wes Anderson’s “The Royal Tenenbaums” introduced Hackman to a new generation, and his presence helped define the film.When the director Wes Anderson and the actors Anjelica Huston, Bill Murray and Gwyneth Paltrow took the stage in 2011 for a panel celebrating the 10th anniversary of Anderson’s “The Royal Tenenbaums,” there was no need for small talk before addressing the elephant in the room.“So, no Gene Hackman?” began the director Noah Baumbach, the panel’s co-moderator, introducing an apparently genuine nervousness into the discussion.Hackman, who was found dead on Wednesday afternoon with his wife at their home in Santa Fe, N.M., at the age of 95, loomed over “The Royal Tenenbaums” in every possible sense.Within the film, of course, he is the paterfamilias — he is Royal Tenenbaum, “the displaced patriarch,” as Hackman put it in an on-set interview — of the remarkable, scattered family at the center of Anderson’s third film, the one that took him from art houses to the mainstream.That 2011 panel dived into Hackman’s presence, particularly an off-camera gruffness, that distinguished him from the whimsy typical of Anderson’s work. Here was the avatar of 1970s grit and paranoia — who had won an Oscar playing the bad-boy narcotics detective Popeye Doyle in “The French Connection” — dropped into a very different type of cinematic vision, from a very different generation.The tone throughout the panel, particularly from Anderson, was respectful and appreciative. But it was clear that Hackman stood out on set. At the time of filming “The Royal Tenenbaums,” Hackman was already considering a retirement that just a few years later he announced and stuck to, Anderson said. None of the panelists had been in touch with Hackman during the intervening years, they said. And they all remembered him being terse with Anderson.We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More