More stories

  • in

    ‘Shoplifters of the World’ Review: Breaking Up Is Hard to Do

    Four friends process the breakup of their musical idols, The Smiths, in this gentle tale of teenage self-discovery.“Shoplifters of the World,” a loving gift to superfans of the English band The Smiths, is, we are told at the beginning, “based on true intentions.” I can’t argue with that: Written and directed by Stephen Kijak (who made the fantastic 2008 documentary “Scott Walker: 30 Century Man”), this sweetly nostalgic look at lost boys and lonely girls feels like it comes straight from the heart.It’s the summer of 1987 and four friends in Denver, Colo., have just learned that their favorite band, The Smiths, has broken up. Like their idols, the teens are romantic and earnest, confused and occasionally pretentious. Cleo (Helena Howard), weary of her supermarket checkout job, dreams of escaping to France; Sheila (Elena Kampouris) desperately wants to consummate her relationship with the adamantly celibate Patrick (James Bloor); and Billy (Nick Krause) might be using his imminent Army training as more escape than destination.As the four embark on a night of mournful partying and mild self-discovery, the nonstop Smiths soundtrack is provided by a local radio D.J. (an amusing Joe Manganiello) whose metal marathon has been hijacked at gunpoint by another grieving fan (Ellar Coltrane).“This music is salvation,” he tells the D.J., who will, of course, be grudgingly converted.Shot in 2018 and inspired by a mischievous urban legend, “Shoplifters” is a Smithstopia of song titles, lyric fragments and scraps of band interviews that infest the movie’s dialogue and production design. But even if you can’t tell Morrissey from Macklemore, don’t be put off: This is a tender story of teen ennui that almost anyone can enjoy. Though probably not metalheads.Shoplifters of the WorldNot rated. Running time: 1 hour 30 minutes. In theaters and available to rent or buy on Google Play, Vudu and other streaming platforms and pay TV operators. Please consult the guidelines outlined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention before watching movies inside theaters. More

  • in

    ‘Senior Moment’ Review: A Romance That Wouldn’t Hurt a Flea

    This Giorgio Serafini movie takes us to a retirement center, a drag race and the DMV, not to mention a dizzying encounter on public transportation.There are many here among us for whom the prospect of spending 90 minutes in the presence of William Shatner would be unalloyed bliss. The world is a funny place. In any event, for them, “Senior Moment,” a romantic comedy, will be, well, unalloyed bliss.Shatner plays, in the consistently bemused fashion that’s become a hallmark of his performances, a character compelled to go where no man he has played has gone before: the DMV.The “Star Trek” legend here incarnates Victor Martin, a former test pilot living his retirement dream in Palm Springs, tooling around in a silver Porsche. In this vehicle he gives his best friend, Sal (Christopher Lloyd), rides to and from a retirement center. He poses for a photo shoot with the car and a young bikini model (Katrina Bowden) whom he imprudently tries to romance. And he scares the devil out of a cafe owner Caroline (Jean Smart) with the car one night, while drag racing against Pablo (Carlos Miranda), a cheerful low rider.That race gets Victor’s license suspended, and his car impounded. While taking the bus, he meets cute with Caroline, and a more age-appropriate affair begins. In reality, Jean Smart is only 20 years younger than Shatner, while Katrina Bowden is well over 50 years younger. Such is Hollywood.Bowden was a regular on the sitcom “30 Rock.” Lloyd created a beloved character on “Taxi.” Smart, among other things, was a fixture on “Designing Women.” So “Senior Moment” presents actors from four significant and still-well-regarded TV shows in a picture that’s significantly less-well-written than any random episode of any of those shows you could name. Giorgio Serafini’s direction is also uninspired. This is the kind of movie that is usually defended with one word: “harmless.”Senior MomentNot rated. Running time: 1 hour 32 minutes. In theaters and on Apple TV, FandangoNow and other streaming platforms and pay TV operators. Please consult the guidelines outlined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention before watching movies inside theaters. More

  • in

    ‘Violation’ Review: The Trauma of Vengeance

    In this thriller, a woman exacts revenge against those who betrayed her and soon discovers the cost of answering violence with more violence.Vengeful women have long been the backbone of the thriller genre. Though Miriam (Madeleine Sims-Fewer), the protagonist of “Violation,” may wish to follow in those coldblooded footsteps, she can’t stomach her own revenge plot — literally. In one moment, when blood is shed, Miriam vomits for an uninterrupted, 78-second shot, heaving on all fours like a cat. Sims-Fewer, who wrote, directed and produced the film with Dusty Mancinelli, drank a pint of salt water so that she could actually throw up for the scene. Such merciless dedication to realism pervades the film, resulting in a revenge story that is ultimately more unsettling — and more successful — than many of its predecessors.This debut feature from Sims-Fewer and Mancinelli centers on Miriam, a woman on the edge of divorce, as she endures a betrayal by her brother-in-law, Dylan (Jesse LaVercombe). Unable to confide in her estranged husband (Obi Abili) and scorned by her sister (Anna Maguire), Miriam takes catharsis into her own hands. To say exactly what happens between Miriam and her loved ones, or how she seeks justice, would topple this delicate construction, which uses a naturalistic approach to depict unnatural violence.At once dreamy and punishingly real, “Violation” seeks to bring viewers into the world of its unraveling protagonist. The story unfurls in non-chronological order, throwing the viewer into Miriam’s trauma-addled memory. Extreme close-ups both intensify and obscure horrific acts, and the sparse script stretches out dialogue-free scenes, the action only punctuated by breaths or sobs.Exemplary performances further ground the film. The actors share incredible chemistry, lending each relationship history and importance while also making it difficult to love or despise anyone completely. Sims-Fewer is the standout, a quadruple threat whose fearlessness renders a protagonist devolving from a doe-eyed wisecrack to a woman on the verge. She is at her best opposite Maguire, their sisterly dynamic constantly wavering between devotion and competition.Nearly all of the action takes place in the woods of Quebec, adding a primal layer to the naturalism. As predators and prey — spiders and flies, wolves and rabbits — cross these humans’ paths, Miriam struggles up the food chain. Though a lifelong “white knight” to her sister, she is also a bleeding heart, outspoken against hunting. In an early scene, she traps a spider under a glass, despite her husband’s insistence that she kill it. Later, when she ensnares a human predator, that mercy is not a mistake she intends to repeat.Though “Violation” throws one outlandish task into Miriam’s otherwise methodical quest for vengeance, the film marks a commendable achievement for its first-time feature directors. Sims-Fewer and Mancinelli have given their subject matter the focus it deserves, distinguishing themselves as thoughtful, artistic and uncompromising in their shared vision. This female-centered story manages to be gutsy while resisting exploitation — a welcome and nuanced addition to a genre often hobbled by didacticism.ViolationNot rated. Running time: 1 hour 47 minutes. Watch on Shudder. More

  • in

    ‘Nina Wu’ Review: Destruction of Body and Soul

    An actress loses her mind in this haunting portrait of exploitation in the film industry from the Taiwanese director Midi Z.It’s easy enough to slap the #MeToo label on “Nina Wu” and call it a day. Yes, its titular heroine (a remarkable Wu Ke-Xi, also a co-writer) is an actress brutalized and exploited by a misogynist film industry, and the Taiwanese director, Midi Z, never pulls his punches. Yet this startlingly evocative, complex and confrontational new film is not interested in justice or didacticism.An internet-famous livestreamer living alone in Taipei, Nina lands the lead role in a racy period thriller that will ultimately catapult her career. She warily consents to full-frontal nudity (she is constantly reminded that a true professional wouldn’t mind), and on set she is violently abused by a “mad genius” director hoping to draw out the most realistic performance by any means.“They’re not only destroying my body, but my soul,” repeats our wobbly-eyed ingénue as the story jumps back and forth to her many auditions and takes. It’s a line from the movie-within-the-movie’s script, yet as the tight frame of the camera grips her face and relishes in her tortured emotions like a sadistic voyeur, her performance eventually becomes her truth.Like “Mulholland Drive,” a clear touchstone, “Nina Wu” grows increasingly disjunctive as beguiling, eerily sensual incursions from a jealous rival rattle the actress. At the same time, cinematic illusion is rendered indistinguishable from reality with rug-pulling that feels genuinely shocking.Traumatic experiences, after all, are no less intense because they’re caught on camera.Crucially, Nina is never merely a symbol for the oppression of women, though she is a victim. In her red dress — the one she wears to her final, fateful audition — she’s just another actress, a number, a body. Yet she emerges as fully herself, scars and all, daring you to look away.Nina WuNot rated. In Mandarin, with subtitles. Running time: 1 hour 42 minutes. Watch through the Museum of the Moving Image’s virtual cinema. More

  • in

    ‘Nobody’ Review: A Wolf in Wimp’s Clothing

    Bob Odenkirk plays a family man with a secret past in this slick, shallow thriller.As slick as a blood spill and as single-minded as a meat grinder, “Nobody” hustles us along with a swiftness that blurs the foolishness of its plot and the depravity of its message. A series of cartoonishly rapid cuts introduces Hutch (Bob Odenkirk), a mild-mannered suburban schmuck whose identical days flip past in a haze of chores and a vague desk job. His sighing wife (Connie Nielsen) and teenage son (Gage Munroe) regard him with something close to pity — especially when he balks at attacking two luckless home invaders. His son is fearless; Hutch is frozen.A journey from emasculation to invigoration, “Nobody” harks back to the vigilante dramas of the 1970s and early 80s. Unlike the would-be heroes of those movies, though, Hutch has no real excuse for the savage spree he instigates and perpetuates. (His family is unharmed; what’s wounded is his ego.) Moreover, Hutch is not who he seems, his secret past seemingly known only to his wily father (Christopher Lloyd) and adoptive brother (RZA). So when he boards a bus, splashing its interior in the blood, teeth and tissue of a passel of Russian gangsters, his lethal skills are as unsurprising as his ultimate satiety. He might emerge bruised and battered, but — after seeing him calmly empty the bullets from his gun before the brawl — we know that’s how he likes it: He wants to feel the damage he’s doing.Flashy and cocksure, “Nobody,” written by Derek Kolstad (the narrative engine of the “John Wick” franchise), sprints from one dust up to the next with winking efficiency. However disreputable its hoary thesis — that real masculinity resides in the fists — its director, Ilya Naishuller, knows how to make a film move. And this one races by: The stunts are ultrasmooth, the dialogue glibly economical and Pawel Pogorzelski’s camera is agile and ruthlessly focused. As the bodies mount and Hutch becomes the target of a karaoke-singing Russian mobster (a charismatic Alexey Serebryakov), the movie feebly tries to pardon Hutch’s implacable brutality.“I’m a good man, a family man,” he informs an adversary. But he’s a counterfeit regular guy in a movie that’s openly contemptuous of such men, a sleeping assassin who’s finally free to scratch a long-suppressed itch. (Steve Lawrence and Eydie Gorme singing “I’ve Gotta Be Me” during his transition is not exactly subtle.) Now, at last, Hutch is alive; more important, now he’s a man.NobodyRated R for guns, knives, explosives and terrible karaoke. Running time: 1 hour 32 minutes. In theaters. Please consult the guidelines outlined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention before watching movies inside theaters. More

  • in

    ‘Bad Trip’ Review: On the Road, Leaking Fluid

    Two pranksters, and a brace of hidden cameras, travel across country in this jauntily gross comedy.Strictly for devotees of degrading pranks and public humiliation, Kitao Sakurai’s “Bad Trip” — a “Jackass”-style road movie belching clouds of poor taste — follows two hapless dreamers from Florida to New York City.Strapping squalid stunts on the back of a dopey narrative, this hidden-camera Netflix comedy sends Chris (Eric Andre, of the supremely weird “The Eric Andre Show”) and his friend Bud (Lil Rel Howery) on a cross-country quest for romance. Chris has learned that his onetime high-school crush (Michaela Conlin) is working in a Manhattan art gallery, and he plans to declare his still-fervent devotion.Contrasting the starry-eyed innocence of this goal with the pair’s repellent misadventures en route, the screenplay (by Andre, Sakurai and Dan Curry) concentrates on bathing its leads in as many noxious emissions as possible. Fake vomit, urine and gorilla ejaculate squirt across the screen as our heroes horrify the unsuspecting patrons of a cowboy bar and a zoo, exemplifying pranks queasily fixated on orificial and genital abuse. Bud’s wrathful sister (Tiffany Haddish), whose beloved car the two have pinched, might be murderously in pursuit, but she can take her time: Her prey won’t get very far with their penises stuck in a Chinese finger trap.However effortful, the movie’s tricks are more likely to activate your gorge than your funny bone. An end-credits reveal of the hidden cameras to the film’s good-natured dupes has a humorous purity that’s unexpected and appealing — if far too late to mitigate the dreck that has gone before.Bad TripRated R. Did I mention the gorilla ejaculate? Running time: 1 hour 24 minutes. Watch on Netflix. More

  • in

    Bob Odenkirk Is Out for Revenge in ‘Nobody’

    The influential comedian and “Better Call Saul” star isn’t kidding about his bid for action-movie stardom, training rigorously for his new thriller.On “Better Call Saul,” Bob Odenkirk has walked a careful line between wry comedy and soul-baring drama. Over five seasons, he has played the unscrupulous lawyer Jimmy McGill on his downward path to becoming the venal Saul Goodman, the character he introduced on “Breaking Bad.”The role is a professional plot twist that continues to delight Odenkirk as well as his longtime fans who first got to know him as a writer and performer of absurdist comedy sketches on “Saturday Night Live,” “The Ben Stiller Show” and “Mr. Show With Bob and David.”Now the 58-year-old actor is looking to make another change in his trajectory, one that’s equally, if not more, surprising: starring in the action thriller “Nobody.”The film, which Universal will release on Friday in theaters and April 16 on-demand, casts Odenkirk as Hutch Mansell, a seemingly nondescript suburban husband and father who is shaken by a break-in at his home, an incident that drives him to violent revenge and a reckoning with his own past.Amid flying fists, broken bones, car chases and explosions, “Nobody” has the requisite level of humor you’d expect to find in an action movie. But the film, which is directed by Ilya Naishuller (“Hardcore Henry”) and written by Derek Kolstad (“John Wick”), is not a comedy or a parody.As Odenkirk explained in a video interview in February: “It was intended as a genre movie — pure, unapologetic, unironic. Hopefully we take it to such an extreme that it becomes nothing but a cinematic explosion of fury and elemental rage.”Beyond his sincere efforts to see if audiences will embrace him in this role — one that required months of fitness training and fight choreography — Odenkirk is also using “Nobody” as a constructive outlet to work through his own real-life experiences as a break-in victim.Speaking from his home in Los Angeles, Odenkirk talked about the making of “Nobody” and how his comedic chops come in handy when it’s time to plan a fight scene. These are edited excerpts from that conversation.Odenkirk opposite Alain Moussi in a fight scene that takes place almost entirely in a bus.Universal PicturesWas it as enjoyable to play an action hero as we all imagine it to be?I wasn’t sure if it would be satisfying or just a weird challenge that made no sense to me when I was finally allowed to execute it. I wasn’t sure if I’d be there on set thinking, “This is way off-base — this is not satisfying in any way.” It was really satisfying and really fun.Was it the next logical step for you after “Breaking Bad” and “Better Call Saul”?It’s not easy to figure out what connects this to everything else in my career, and I’m not sure I can make it easy for you. When I first approached it, my brain said, “Maybe I could do an action movie.” I’m in good shape; I could maybe learn if I had time. And I think I have the components for an action lead in this “Better Call Saul” character that I play. He’s earnest. He’s indefatigable. He finds a way around everything. He’s always shifting his approach to try to get over the latest wrinkle or issue in front of him. The only thing he doesn’t do is fight.You were inspired to make this movie, in part, by some very frightening personal experiences. Are you comfortable discussing this?[His voice softens.] I can only talk about it a little. My family has had two break-ins here in L.A., and the first one was particularly traumatic. The residual feelings of frustration and anger are real and stayed with me. They were something I thought I could build this character out of. I know that violence doesn’t solve anything. But believe me, you have a desire to hurt someone who hurts your family.In the movie, your character is shamed for not trying to subdue his home invaders. Did a police officer actually say something like that to you?“That’s not what I would have done.” Yes — implying that they would have done something violent or confrontational. My immediate thought was, “Everybody be cool, get this person out of the house, we’re all OK.”It’s not really true; we weren’t all OK. And the violation that happened, the damage from that — honestly, there’s parts of it I can’t talk about. I would just say it resonates through our lives. That sense of being victimized by something you can do nothing about and in no way push back against. It really stayed with me, and it still does. But I did enjoy acting out my rage in this movie. It’s all phony baloney but super fun.Odenkirk said of his turn to action hero: “I wasn’t sure if I’d be there on set, thinking, ‘This is way off-base — this is not satisfying in any way.’ It was really satisfying and really fun.”Ryan Lowry for The New York TimesWhen did you start taking concrete steps to get this made as a movie?It was after the second season of “Better Call Saul” [which aired in 2016]. My brother-in-law sent me a screengrab of a “Better Call Saul” ad on a TV in China. I had already been to Europe twice and met a lot of fans of “Better Call Saul” there. I thought, “I wonder if I could do a movie that could play around the world.”Did you expect you might meet some resistance to the idea?Oh, I thought people would say no, right away. I went to one of my managers and I told him my logic, and he said, “I think you might be right.” He started asking around, and he got the same response. People were like, that makes sense.Was your comedy career in any way a roadblock to this goal?If you know “Mr. Show,” it’s really hard to make that leap. But the fact is, most people don’t know it at all. They only know Saul Goodman and Jimmy McGill.You played some memorably explosive characters in your “Mr. Show” tenure, if that helps.I can go from zero to 80 on the rage scale, and I did it a lot for comedy’s sake. And it’s something my father did, only it wasn’t funny when he did it. I would say I inherited it. But you’ve got to watch out when you have that skill. Too often it’s misinterpreted.Before this, were you an action-movie fan?I actually liked Charles Bronson movies and all the “Dirty Harry” movies. My favorite is “Police Story” with Jackie Chan. If this movie works, which is to say people like it and it engenders good will, I would love to do a movie that’s more on that tonal scale of comic action. As much as I hope my friends and fans from the comedy world will enjoy what I did here, if I don’t please people who like action films, then I didn’t really do what I set out to do. I felt like I had to go all the way in that direction.The star in what has become his signature role, Jimmy McGill, a.k.a. Saul Goodman, in “Better Call Saul.”Greg Lewis/AMC and Sony Pictures TelevisionWhen did you have to start your physical training for the role?February 2017. I do cardio; that’s all I did before this. And I had never hurt my back, my knees. Everything’s good enough, it works. It stressed me to drive to the training facility — an hour and 10 minutes, some days more — in L.A. traffic, and think, “You’re training for a movie that’s never going to happen, what is wrong with you? What kind of midlife crisis are you going through?” But I also thought, “If the movie doesn’t happen, well, I’ll be in shape. And I’ll have learned something about my body.”Were your comedy skills helpful as you and your colleagues planned the action set pieces?Let me tell you what I contributed to the bus fight [a scene in which Odenkirk’s character faces off against a gang of roughnecks on a public bus]. We always wanted it to be big and brutal — to shake the audience up and make them go, yeah, we’re doing it. I said, “He has to hurt himself.” The first thing he does is miss and hit his head. I also said, “I want to get thrown out of the bus and come back in.” By the way, there’s so many moments in this that you could transpose to normal dad life by dialing down the intensity level.What happens if “Nobody” is successful enough that these kinds of action movies become the next chapter of your career?I shouldn’t worry about that. Because I’m in show business. If they come to me with 10 more action movies, I could say, “No, thank you,” to all of them. That’s up to me. Tomorrow I’m pitching an animated comedy show with my friend [and “Mr. Show” collaborator] Dino Stamatopoulos. I have a lot of say in that. I’m older, I’ve done a lot. I know that I’m never happy staying in one place anyway. I’m not too worried about getting cornered.Is it fair to say you’re taking some delight in the bafflement of all this?Part of me wants there to be two Bob Odenkirks. Just so I can have a gravestone with two opposite sides. “He brought the pain,” on one side. “My God, he was funny,” on the other. Has anyone ever done that? A grave with two different things? One side says, “Beloved husband, cherished father.” The other side says, “Despised ex-husband, resented father.”As we’re speaking, you’re about to start work on the last season of “Better Call Saul.” Is the finality of it all starting to dawn on you?Not yet. I have so much to do, I can’t think like that. I have to save that for somewhere down the line. There’s just too much work ahead of me.We don’t know how it all ends for Saul Goodman, but we know the road thus far has taken him to a low-profile gig at Cinnabon. Have you made any unannounced stops to Cinnabon lately, just to see what happens?I have not, but I know what goes into a Cinnabon. My trainer for the action movies would not be OK with me enjoying a Cinnabon. But they are good. Enjoy your Cinnabons, folks, while you can. Someday they’re going to want you to do an action movie and have you eat avocados and eggs for the rest of your life. More

  • in

    Her Film on Sex Assault Depicts Her Own and Fuels a #MeToo Moment

    Danijela Stajnfeld included her account of being assaulted in a film that has led to contentious debate in Serbia and prompted other women to come forward to say they were sexually abused.Her face graced billboards in Belgrade. She appeared regularly in Serbian movies, magazines and television shows. Trained at the prestigious Faculty of Dramatic Arts in Belgrade, Danijela Stajnfeld had, by the age of 26 in 2011, won two major theater prizes and was a permanent member with the esteemed Belgrade Drama Theater.The following year, she abruptly and mysteriously dropped from public view. It wasn’t until last summer that she publicly revealed why.In her documentary, “Hold Me Right,” about victims and perpetrators of sexual assault, Stajnfeld said that she too had been sexually assaulted eight years earlier by a powerful Serbian man, which had prompted her move to the United States.When the film premiered last year at the Sarajevo Film Festival, Stajnfeld said she was nervous but could not imagine its causing waves. “I thought no one remembered me, I didn’t keep in touch with anyone in Serbia,” she said in an interview.The media firestorm that erupted within days of the premiere proved her wrong.The film “Hold Me Right” presents possible reactions, some constructive, some not, to sexual assault.   Hold Me RightStajnfeld’s face was suddenly all over the Serbian press again. Television and online commentators praised her for speaking out or savaged her for not disclosing the man’s name.She said she did not identify the man because she wanted the film to focus on survivors and healing, rather than singling out a perpetrator. But the country’s tabloids speculated wildly about his identity. Reporters approached Stajnfeld’s unsuspecting parents in their small village. Critics questioned her motives. “Sick!” read one headline. “Actress made up the rape to advertise her film.”Even for someone who had grown up in Serbia, where sexism and male chauvinism are deeply entrenched, the blowback was stunning, Stajnfeld said. While the country has taken steps to advance the cause of women’s rights in recent years — in 2013 it ratified a human rights convention addressing gender-based violence — in Serbia, as in the surrounding region, sexual harassment and assaults are still only rarely reported, and victim shaming abounds.“After opening up, it was so liberating; I thought the narrative was in my hands,” Stajnfeld said. “But it caused even more unsafety and ridiculous dehumanization.”But in recent months, spurred partly by the film, the mood in some quarters has changed. In January, several other Serbian actresses came out publicly with allegations that they had been raped, and a MeToo-like movement roared to life in this region where the culture of calling out abusers had yet to gain a foothold.Using the hashtag #NisiSama, which means “You are not alone,” and on the Facebook page Nisam Trazila, or “I didn’t ask for it,” which has 40,000 followers, supporters urged that victims of sexual harassment be believed and perpetrators be held to account.“We have followed what was happening around the globe with the #MeToo movement, but I think we needed authentic voices of women from this region in order to have this kind of reaction,” Sanja Pavlovic, of the Autonomous Women’s Center in Belgrade, said in an email.Last week Stajnfeld, who lives in New York, flew to Serbia, met with the police and prosecutors and identified the man who she said assaulted her as Branislav Lecic.Branislav Lecic, a celebrated Serbian actor, has denied that he ever had a sexual encounter with Stajnfeld. Darko Vojinovic/Associated PressHer disclosure refueled the media blitz, in part because Lecic, 65, is a famed figure in Serbia, not only a prominent actor but also a professor and former minister of culture. Only weeks ago, he had spoken out against sexual assault.“When a woman says no, that’s the end of it. I don’t understand that someone can’t control their urges,” he told one Serbian newspaper.Stajnfeld says that statement, in part, was what compelled her to publicly name him.Lecic has denied any sexual contact with Stajnfeld, with whom he acted in a play, “Daily Command,” at the time in 2012 when she says the assault occurred.“I have never had sexual contact with her. Everything else would be a lie!” Lecic wrote in a WhatsApp message.But Stajnfeld provided prosecutors and members of the media with an audio recording of her confronting him in a Belgrade restaurant in December 2016, in which he acknowledges that she said no to his advances. Excerpts of the audio, distilled from a longer tape, with the man’s voice disguised, are included in the film.In the recording, she says several times that she wishes he had respected the fact that she had objected to his actions, but she does not go into detail about what then transpired.“Back then I felt jeopardized. Can you understand that?” Stajnfeld says on the tape.“I can understand that, but it’s a big mistake, because my expression of tenderness indeed means my respect,” Lecic replied, saying it was an achievement “that you triggered my attention and feeling.”Stajnfeld and Lecic in a scene from the play “Daily Command.”Belgrade Drama TheaterLecic said what happened ought to “feel like an honor, not to put you in jeopardy.” “Who do you think I am?” he continued. “As if I don’t respect who I am.”In the recording, Lecic also pushed back on Stajnfeld’s assertion that if she says no, she means no. “It doesn’t work like that,” he said, later adding, “Life is unpredictable, like a game.”In recent days, Lecic, communicating over WhatsApp, said that he and Stajnfeld met at the restaurant to discuss a potential collaboration, and that the audio provided by Stajnfeld was incomplete: A longer version, he said, would reveal the broader context, that they were merely improvising dialogue, and that she was possibly claiming he assaulted her to gain publicity for her film.“Maybe she was expecting something more, maybe it’s because nothing happened that she wants revenge, and maybe she wants to build her story through me,” he wrote. “Bad marketing is also marketing.”But Stajnfeld provided a 77-minute audio file that she says represents nearly all of their roughly 90-minute conversation: The tape cut off, she said, when her phone battery died. Parts of their conversation are inaudible, and drowned out by background noise. Still, there is no indication they were rehearsing dialogue. Though the voices are muffled at times and the banter often seems friendly, Stajnfeld’s voice gets sterner as she describes how hurt she was by his actions. Lecic responds in a way that suggests he believed that what happened was consensual.When they began rehearsing the play, Stajnfeld said she viewed Lecic as a mentor and a friend, until he began propositioning her to have sex. Then, one day, in his dressing room, she said he abruptly shoved his hand up her dress. Stajnfeld said she pulled away and fled, stunned, but opted not to tell the director because she was worried she wouldn’t be believed, and that it could hurt her career. Lecic denied any sexual encounter took place.At the time, she said in an interview, she had already approached Lecic, who she viewed as an influential political figure, for a reference letter to apply for an American work visa. She said she was looking for opportunities in the United States, but never intended to abandon her Serbian career.She said Lecic first insisted they walk in a park nearby. Then, she said, on what she assumed was a lift home, he drove in the wrong direction, frightening her, and telling her he was taking her to see a beautiful view of Belgrade.An image from the film “Hold Me Right” that depicts how sharing stories of sexual assault and receiving support are vital to healing. Hold Me RightWhen they arrived at a house on a hill in the city’s outskirts, she said Lecic undressed her and sexually assaulted her, despite the fact that she was crying and repeatedly said no.“In that moment, I was so tortured,” she continued. “He was asking me to do stuff for him. I wanted to do anything for this torture to stop. I couldn’t move my arms, my mouth, I couldn’t stop crying,” she said.Franz Stefan Gady, who used to date Stajnfeld and was living in Stockholm at the time, said within days she had provided him with an account of having been sexually assaulted by the “older guy” in the play.Stajnfeld said she told police and prosecutors last week the same details of her encounters with Lecic in the dressing room and at the house. But she had not gone to the authorities at the time, she said, because she feared her story would be leaked to the press and her career ruined. Instead, she booked a ticket to the United States where, in New York, she began to unravel. She had panic attacks and later considered suicide, but with the help of therapy and victim support groups, she became determined to overcome the trauma. She began interviewing and filming survivors, and what started as a 10-minute short ended up growing, over the course of three-and-a-half years, into her first feature-length film as a director.Stajnfeld said she never intended to insert her own story into her film, but after seeing the rough cut, she knew she had to include her experience too.“For the sake of justice, for the sake of my healing, for the sake of other victims in the region, I’m speaking out now,” she said in the interview with The Times.The film is scheduled to screen at the Martovski film festival in Belgrade later this spring, she said, followed by a U.S. release.After the premiere of Stajnfeld’s film last summer, media commentators said she should be ashamed, that she had slept with a man to get a role, that she should name him or else be prosecuted, that she dishonored women who had really been raped, and that she looked too happy in a recent televised interview to have been a victim.“The public opinion took a tabloid approach, hungry for blood, public humiliation, shame and guilt,” said Snezana Dakic, a Serbian television presenter. “And that is exactly opposite from how this problem should be treated.”Whatever personal catharsis the film represents, more people are seeing Stajnfeld’s film as a spark for the groundswell of support for sexual assault victims underway in Serbia and the surrounding Balkan region.“Danijela’s case gave wings to other women, actresses, to talk about what happened to them,” said Dragana Grncarski, a former model and public figure. “Coming out in the open, they prevent things like that from happening to other women.”Indira K. Skoric provided translations. More